Performance of a handheld ultrasound device in detecting retinal detachments.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_230_24
Connor Nathe, Nicholas Max Scoville, Kenneth Matthew McKay, Kasra Rezaei, Shu Feng
{"title":"Performance of a handheld ultrasound device in detecting retinal detachments.","authors":"Connor Nathe, Nicholas Max Scoville, Kenneth Matthew McKay, Kasra Rezaei, Shu Feng","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_230_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the accuracy and performance of the Butterfly IQ+ handheld ultrasound (HHUS) in detecting retinal detachments (RDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study of eyes with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) RD imaged using a conventional B-scan ophthalmic ultrasound device Ellex Eye Cubed by Clarion Medical Technologies (Cambridge, ON, CA) and a portable HHUS (Butterfly IQ+). Images were compared between the modalities for qualitative differences. Agreement between the HHUS and standard ultrasonography equipment and with clinical examination was quantified using Cohen's kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty eyes of 33 patients were included in the study. Twenty eyes of 18 patients had RDs, and 20 eyes of 18 patients did not. The observed agreement in RD diagnosis between the Butterfly and the Ellex Eye Cubed was 97.5%., and the Cohen's Kappa was 0.950 (95% CI: 0.85-1.00). The observed agreement in RD diagnosis between the Butterfly IQ+ and diagnosis confirmed by the gold standard of clinical exam was 92.5%, and Cohen's Kappa was 0.850 (95% CI: 0.69-1.00). The sensitivity and specificity of the Butterfly ultrasound in RD diagnosis were 90% (95% CI: 68.3-98.8%) and 95% (95% CI: 83.2-100), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a high degree of agreement between the systems for the identification of RD. The Butterfly IQ's extreme portability and ease of use make it a viable option to screen for RDs in hospital-based consults, emergency departments, or low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_230_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy and performance of the Butterfly IQ+ handheld ultrasound (HHUS) in detecting retinal detachments (RDs).

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study of eyes with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) RD imaged using a conventional B-scan ophthalmic ultrasound device Ellex Eye Cubed by Clarion Medical Technologies (Cambridge, ON, CA) and a portable HHUS (Butterfly IQ+). Images were compared between the modalities for qualitative differences. Agreement between the HHUS and standard ultrasonography equipment and with clinical examination was quantified using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: Forty eyes of 33 patients were included in the study. Twenty eyes of 18 patients had RDs, and 20 eyes of 18 patients did not. The observed agreement in RD diagnosis between the Butterfly and the Ellex Eye Cubed was 97.5%., and the Cohen's Kappa was 0.950 (95% CI: 0.85-1.00). The observed agreement in RD diagnosis between the Butterfly IQ+ and diagnosis confirmed by the gold standard of clinical exam was 92.5%, and Cohen's Kappa was 0.850 (95% CI: 0.69-1.00). The sensitivity and specificity of the Butterfly ultrasound in RD diagnosis were 90% (95% CI: 68.3-98.8%) and 95% (95% CI: 83.2-100), respectively.

Conclusion: There was a high degree of agreement between the systems for the identification of RD. The Butterfly IQ's extreme portability and ease of use make it a viable option to screen for RDs in hospital-based consults, emergency departments, or low-resource settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手持式超声波设备在检测视网膜脱离方面的性能。
目的:评估 Butterfly IQ+ 手持式超声设备 (HHUS) 在检测视网膜脱离 (RD) 方面的准确性和性能:方法:使用克拉里昂医疗技术公司(Clarion Medical Technologies,Cambridge, ON, CA)生产的传统 B 扫描眼科超声设备 Ellex Eye Cubed 和便携式 HHUS(Butterfly IQ+)对患有视网膜脱离(n = 20)和不患有视网膜脱离(n = 20)的眼睛进行成像的横断面观察研究。对两种模式的图像进行比较,以确定其质量差异。使用科恩卡帕系数量化 HHUS 与标准超声设备和临床检查之间的一致性:研究共纳入了 33 名患者的 40 只眼睛。其中 18 名患者的 20 只眼睛有 RD,18 名患者的 20 只眼睛没有 RD。观察发现,Butterfly 和 Ellex Eye Cubed 对 RD 诊断的一致性为 97.5%,Cohen's Kappa 为 0.950(95% CI:0.85-1.00)。蝴蝶 IQ+ 与临床检查金标准确诊的 RD 诊断结果的一致性为 92.5%,Cohen's Kappa 为 0.850(95% CI:0.69-1.00)。蝴蝶超声诊断 RD 的敏感性和特异性分别为 90% (95% CI: 68.3-98.8%) 和 95% (95% CI: 83.2-100):结论:两种系统对 RD 的鉴定结果高度一致。蝴蝶 IQ 的便携性和易用性使其成为在医院会诊、急诊科或低资源环境中筛查 RD 的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
Association between gut microbiota and central retinal artery occlusion: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Clinical outcomes of topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized LASIK for correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. Accuracy of Intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric traumatic cataract. Alterations in the tear film and ocular surface in pediatric migraine patients. Guidelines for setting up low-vision and rehabilitation services in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1