Establishing a risk prediction model for residual pulmonary vascular obstruction after regular anticoagulant therapy for non-high-risk pulmonary embolism.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-07-30 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.21037/jtd-23-1876
Dongping Zhu, Junfei Feng, Jie Guo, Jixian Duan, Yan Yang, Jing Leng
{"title":"Establishing a risk prediction model for residual pulmonary vascular obstruction after regular anticoagulant therapy for non-high-risk pulmonary embolism.","authors":"Dongping Zhu, Junfei Feng, Jie Guo, Jixian Duan, Yan Yang, Jing Leng","doi":"10.21037/jtd-23-1876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been on the rise annually. Despite receiving regular sequential anticoagulation therapy, some patients with non-high-risk acute PE (APE) continue to experience residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO). This study sought to identify the risk factors for RPVO following 3 months of sequential anticoagulation therapy for non-high-risk PE. Machine learning techniques were utilized to construct a clinical prediction model for predicting the occurrence of RPVO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 254 acute non-high-risk PE patients were included in this study, all of whom were admitted to the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province between 2020 and 2023. After 3 months of regular anticoagulant treatment, computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) were reviewed to identify the presence of RPVO. Patients were then categorized into either the thrombolysis group or the thrombosis residue group. Throughout the study period, 49 patients were excluded due to missing data, irregular treatment, or loss to follow-up. Clinical symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory results of 205 PE patients were recorded. Correlation and collinearity analyses were conducted on relevant risk factors, and significance tests were performed. Heat maps illustrating the relationships between influencing factors were generated. Predictors were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to create a predictive model. Internal validation of the model was also carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By searching the literature to understand all the clinical indicators that may affect the efficacy of anticoagulation therapy. A total of 205 patients with non-high-risk acute pulmonary thromboembolism were evaluated for various risk factors. Five independent factors were identified by multivariable analysis-age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acratia, pulmonary systolic blood pressure (PASP), and major arterial embolism-and their P value, odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were as follows: (P=0.012, OR =1.123; 95% CI: 1.026-1.23), (P=0.002, OR =13.30; 95% CI: 2.673-66.188), (P=0.001, OR =14.009; 95% CI: 2.782-70.547), (P=0.003, OR =1.061; 95% CI: 1.020-1.103) and (P<0.001, OR =18.128; 95% CI: 3.853-85.293), which may indicate a poor prognosis after standard anticoagulant therapy. A nomogram was constructed using these variables and internally validated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for the training set and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) for the validation set. Calibration curves were utilized to assess the practicality of the nomogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel predictive model was developed based on a single-center retrospective study to identify patients with RPVO following anticoagulant therapy for acute non-high-risk PE. This model may aid in the early detection of patients, prompt adjustment of treatment, and ultimately lead to a decrease in adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-1876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been on the rise annually. Despite receiving regular sequential anticoagulation therapy, some patients with non-high-risk acute PE (APE) continue to experience residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO). This study sought to identify the risk factors for RPVO following 3 months of sequential anticoagulation therapy for non-high-risk PE. Machine learning techniques were utilized to construct a clinical prediction model for predicting the occurrence of RPVO.

Methods: A total of 254 acute non-high-risk PE patients were included in this study, all of whom were admitted to the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province between 2020 and 2023. After 3 months of regular anticoagulant treatment, computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) were reviewed to identify the presence of RPVO. Patients were then categorized into either the thrombolysis group or the thrombosis residue group. Throughout the study period, 49 patients were excluded due to missing data, irregular treatment, or loss to follow-up. Clinical symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory results of 205 PE patients were recorded. Correlation and collinearity analyses were conducted on relevant risk factors, and significance tests were performed. Heat maps illustrating the relationships between influencing factors were generated. Predictors were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to create a predictive model. Internal validation of the model was also carried out.

Results: By searching the literature to understand all the clinical indicators that may affect the efficacy of anticoagulation therapy. A total of 205 patients with non-high-risk acute pulmonary thromboembolism were evaluated for various risk factors. Five independent factors were identified by multivariable analysis-age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acratia, pulmonary systolic blood pressure (PASP), and major arterial embolism-and their P value, odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were as follows: (P=0.012, OR =1.123; 95% CI: 1.026-1.23), (P=0.002, OR =13.30; 95% CI: 2.673-66.188), (P=0.001, OR =14.009; 95% CI: 2.782-70.547), (P=0.003, OR =1.061; 95% CI: 1.020-1.103) and (P<0.001, OR =18.128; 95% CI: 3.853-85.293), which may indicate a poor prognosis after standard anticoagulant therapy. A nomogram was constructed using these variables and internally validated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for the training set and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) for the validation set. Calibration curves were utilized to assess the practicality of the nomogram.

Conclusions: A novel predictive model was developed based on a single-center retrospective study to identify patients with RPVO following anticoagulant therapy for acute non-high-risk PE. This model may aid in the early detection of patients, prompt adjustment of treatment, and ultimately lead to a decrease in adverse outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立非高风险肺栓塞常规抗凝治疗后残留肺血管阻塞的风险预测模型。
背景:肺栓塞(PE)的发病率呈逐年上升趋势。尽管接受了正规的序贯抗凝治疗,一些非高风险急性 PE(APE)患者仍会出现残余肺血管阻塞(RPVO)。本研究旨在确定非高风险 PE 患者接受 3 个月序贯抗凝疗法后出现 RPVO 的风险因素。研究利用机器学习技术构建了一个临床预测模型,用于预测 RPVO 的发生:本研究共纳入 254 例急性非高危 PE 患者,均为 2020 年至 2023 年期间在云南省第三人民医院住院的患者。在接受常规抗凝治疗 3 个月后,复查计算机断层扫描肺血管造影(CTPA)以确定是否存在 RPVO。然后将患者分为溶栓组和血栓残留组。在整个研究期间,有49名患者因数据缺失、治疗不规范或失去随访而被排除。研究记录了 205 名 PE 患者的临床症状、体征和实验室结果。对相关风险因素进行了相关性和共线性分析,并进行了显著性检验。绘制了热图,说明影响因素之间的关系。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归法选择预测因子,然后进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以建立预测模型。此外,还对模型进行了内部验证:通过检索文献,了解可能影响抗凝疗法疗效的所有临床指标。共对 205 名非高危急性肺血栓栓塞症患者进行了各种风险因素评估。通过多变量分析确定了五个独立因素--年龄、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)、霰粒肿、肺动脉收缩压(PASP)和主要动脉栓塞,其 P 值、比值比(OR)和置信区间(CI)如下:(P=0.012,OR=1.123;95% CI:1.026-1.23)、(P=0.002,OR=13.30;95% CI:2.673-66.188)、(P=0.001,OR=14.009;95% CI:2.782-70.547)、(P=0.003,OR=1.061;95% CI:1.020-1.103)和(PC结论:根据一项单中心回顾性研究开发了一种新型预测模型,用于识别急性非高危 PE 抗凝治疗后的 RPVO 患者。该模型有助于早期发现患者,及时调整治疗方案,最终减少不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
A prediction model based on computed tomography characteristics for identifying malignant from benign sub-centimeter solid pulmonary nodules. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis a narrative review primary focus on treatments. Bronchoscopic holmium laser ablation continuous cryoablation for the treatment of airway stenosis caused by tissue hyperplasia after tracheal intubation: clinical case observation. Can the rest of the world replicate excellent segmentectomy outcomes with lower volume thoracic surgeons? Chest wall resections for non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1