Systematic review and meta-analysis of breathing exercises effects on lung function and quality of life in postoperative lung cancer patients.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-07-30 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.21037/jtd-23-1733
Jiayi Ren, Zongyue Li, Yuchen He, Hang Gao, Jin Li, Jiming Tao
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of breathing exercises effects on lung function and quality of life in postoperative lung cancer patients.","authors":"Jiayi Ren, Zongyue Li, Yuchen He, Hang Gao, Jin Li, Jiming Tao","doi":"10.21037/jtd-23-1733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative recovery in lung cancer patients is a complex process, where breathing exercises may play a crucial role in enhancing pulmonary function and quality of life (QoL). This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the impact of breathing exercises on post-surgical lung function and QoL in lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase databases using terms like \"Lung Neoplasms\", \"breathing exercises\", and \"randomized controlled trial\", supplemented by Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free words. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of breathing exercises post-lung cancer surgery followed by data extraction and quality evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 384 retrieved studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for detailed analysis. The main outcomes assessed were postoperative pulmonary function indices and QoL measures. The majority of studies were deemed 'low risk' for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. However, due to the nature of the interventions, blinding was a 'high risk' in most cases. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in key pulmonary function indices: forced vital capacity (FVC%) increased by an average of 1.73%, maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) improved by 7.58 L/min, and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) enhanced by 0.95 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Additionally, there was a notable alleviation of postoperative dyspnea and an enhancement in QoL, with anxiety scores decreasing by an average of 3.42 points and complication rates reducing correspondingly. However, the interventions did not significantly affect physical activity levels or performance on the 6-minute walk test (6WMT), with effect sizes for these outcomes being non-significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that breathing exercises significantly improve postoperative pulmonary function and QoL in lung cancer patients. Future research should delve into the mechanisms behind these exercises and evaluate their long-term rehabilitation effects. Customized programs could further optimize recovery and enhance patient QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-1733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative recovery in lung cancer patients is a complex process, where breathing exercises may play a crucial role in enhancing pulmonary function and quality of life (QoL). This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the impact of breathing exercises on post-surgical lung function and QoL in lung cancer patients.

Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase databases using terms like "Lung Neoplasms", "breathing exercises", and "randomized controlled trial", supplemented by Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free words. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of breathing exercises post-lung cancer surgery followed by data extraction and quality evaluation.

Results: From 384 retrieved studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for detailed analysis. The main outcomes assessed were postoperative pulmonary function indices and QoL measures. The majority of studies were deemed 'low risk' for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. However, due to the nature of the interventions, blinding was a 'high risk' in most cases. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in key pulmonary function indices: forced vital capacity (FVC%) increased by an average of 1.73%, maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) improved by 7.58 L/min, and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) enhanced by 0.95 cmH2O. Additionally, there was a notable alleviation of postoperative dyspnea and an enhancement in QoL, with anxiety scores decreasing by an average of 3.42 points and complication rates reducing correspondingly. However, the interventions did not significantly affect physical activity levels or performance on the 6-minute walk test (6WMT), with effect sizes for these outcomes being non-significant.

Conclusions: This study indicates that breathing exercises significantly improve postoperative pulmonary function and QoL in lung cancer patients. Future research should delve into the mechanisms behind these exercises and evaluate their long-term rehabilitation effects. Customized programs could further optimize recovery and enhance patient QoL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸练习对肺癌术后患者肺功能和生活质量影响的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:肺癌患者的术后恢复是一个复杂的过程,其中呼吸练习可能在提高肺功能和生活质量(QoL)方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究对呼吸练习对肺癌患者术后肺功能和生活质量的影响进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:在 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库中使用 "肺部肿瘤"、"呼吸练习 "和 "随机对照试验 "等术语,并辅以医学主题词表(MeSH)和自由词进行了广泛的文献检索。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。对肺癌术后呼吸练习的效果进行系统综述和荟萃分析,然后进行数据提取和质量评估:从检索到的 384 项研究中,有 10 项符合纳入标准,并被选中进行详细分析。评估的主要结果是术后肺功能指数和 QoL 指标。大多数研究在随机序列生成和分配隐藏方面被视为 "低风险"。然而,由于干预措施的性质,在大多数情况下,盲法属于 "高风险"。荟萃分析表明,主要肺功能指标均有显著改善:用力肺活量(FVC%)平均提高了 1.73%,最大自主通气量(MVV)提高了 7.58 升/分钟,最大吸气压力(MIP)提高了 0.95 cmH2O。此外,术后呼吸困难明显缓解,生活质量得到提高,焦虑评分平均降低了 3.42 分,并发症发生率也相应降低。然而,干预措施并未对体力活动水平或 6 分钟步行测试(6WMT)成绩产生明显影响,这些结果的效应大小均不显著:本研究表明,呼吸练习能明显改善肺癌患者的术后肺功能和生活质量。未来的研究应深入探讨这些运动背后的机制,并评估其长期康复效果。量身定制的计划可进一步优化康复效果,提高患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
A prediction model based on computed tomography characteristics for identifying malignant from benign sub-centimeter solid pulmonary nodules. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis a narrative review primary focus on treatments. Bronchoscopic holmium laser ablation continuous cryoablation for the treatment of airway stenosis caused by tissue hyperplasia after tracheal intubation: clinical case observation. Can the rest of the world replicate excellent segmentectomy outcomes with lower volume thoracic surgeons? Chest wall resections for non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1