When Patients and Providers Feel Helpless: A Commentary on "Palliative Care for Refractory Depressive Symptoms in a Female Veteran Geriatric Patient".

Q3 Medicine Journal of Clinical Ethics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1086/730894
Edmund G Howe
{"title":"When Patients and Providers Feel Helpless: A Commentary on \"Palliative Care for Refractory Depressive Symptoms in a Female Veteran Geriatric Patient\".","authors":"Edmund G Howe","doi":"10.1086/730894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractWhether providers should ever help patients die when they profoundly suffer from seemingly irreversible psychiatric illness is globally controversial. For example, in 2016, the American Psychiatric Association held that psychiatrists should never help bring about such patients' deaths, whereas in the Netherlands this intervention has been permitted for 30 years, and the number has increased from 2 in 2011 to 83 in 2017. This commentary asks when, if ever, providers should give up on seeking to treat these patients. Providers who have been exceptionally successful at reaching and helping these patients and some of the approaches they used are presented. These include particularly their helping these patients see meaning in their lives, using humor, and understanding them or at least trying to. I propose that establishing a felt connection may always remain possible and that this end may be a more important goal than any other.</p>","PeriodicalId":39646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","volume":"35 3","pages":"202-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/730894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractWhether providers should ever help patients die when they profoundly suffer from seemingly irreversible psychiatric illness is globally controversial. For example, in 2016, the American Psychiatric Association held that psychiatrists should never help bring about such patients' deaths, whereas in the Netherlands this intervention has been permitted for 30 years, and the number has increased from 2 in 2011 to 83 in 2017. This commentary asks when, if ever, providers should give up on seeking to treat these patients. Providers who have been exceptionally successful at reaching and helping these patients and some of the approaches they used are presented. These include particularly their helping these patients see meaning in their lives, using humor, and understanding them or at least trying to. I propose that establishing a felt connection may always remain possible and that this end may be a more important goal than any other.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当病人和医护人员感到无助时:女性退伍老年患者难治性抑郁症的姑息治疗 "评论。
摘要当患者深受看似不可逆转的精神疾病之苦时,医疗服务提供者是否应该帮助患者死亡,在全球范围内都存在争议。例如,2016年,美国精神病学协会认为,精神科医生绝不应帮助这类患者死亡,而在荷兰,这种干预已被允许了30年,人数也从2011年的2人增加到2017年的83人。这篇评论提出了一个问题:如果医疗服务提供者应该放弃治疗这些患者,那么什么时候才应该放弃?文中介绍了在接触和帮助这些患者方面取得巨大成功的医疗服务提供者,以及他们所采用的一些方法。其中特别包括他们帮助这些病人看到自己生命的意义、使用幽默、理解他们或至少尝试理解他们。我建议,建立一种感觉上的联系可能永远是可能的,而且这个目的可能比任何其他目标都更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Ethics
Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.
期刊最新文献
Dual Advocates in Deceased Organ Donation: The Potential for Moral Distress in Organ Procurement Organization Staff. Duty to Family: Ethical Considerations in the Resuscitation Bay. Home Birth in the United States: An Evidence-Based Ethical Analysis. How Should We Allocate Divisible Resources? An Overlooked Question. New Ways to Help Patients Worst Off.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1