Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.100779
Gustavo A Viani, Andre G Gouveia, Fabio Arcidiacono, Gustavo N Marta, Ana Carolina Hamamura, Paola Anselmo, Felipe S Barbosa, Fabio Y Moraes
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gustavo A Viani, Andre G Gouveia, Fabio Arcidiacono, Gustavo N Marta, Ana Carolina Hamamura, Paola Anselmo, Felipe S Barbosa, Fabio Y Moraes","doi":"10.5603/rpor.100779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) stands as the predominant type of brainstem glioma. It is characterized by a notably brief median survival period, with the majority of patients experiencing disease progression within six months following radiation therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in DIPG treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in four databases, and relevant studies comparing HFRT and CFRT in DIPG were included. Data were extracted and analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related toxicities. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects models with heterogeneity assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 518 patients. No significant difference in one-year OS was observed between HFRT and CFRT (29% <i>vs.</i> 22%, p = 0.94). The median OS was similar in both treatment groups (9.7 <i>vs.</i> 9.3 months, p = 0.324). Similarly, no significant difference in one-year PFS was found between HFRT and CFRT (19.8% <i>vs.</i> 16.6%, p = 0.82), with comparable median PFS (9.3 <i>vs.</i> 9.4 months, p = 0.20). In meta-regression analysis, there was no association of chemotherapy (p > 0.05) or radiation biologically effective dose (BED) (p > 0.05) regarding OS or PFS outcomes. There were no significant differences in treatment-related toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HFRT yields one-year OS and PFS rates similar to CFRT in DIPG, with no significant differences in treatment-related toxicities. Chemotherapy and BED did not affect OS or PFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"29 3","pages":"309-317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.100779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) stands as the predominant type of brainstem glioma. It is characterized by a notably brief median survival period, with the majority of patients experiencing disease progression within six months following radiation therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in DIPG treatment.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in four databases, and relevant studies comparing HFRT and CFRT in DIPG were included. Data were extracted and analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related toxicities. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects models with heterogeneity assessment.

Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 518 patients. No significant difference in one-year OS was observed between HFRT and CFRT (29% vs. 22%, p = 0.94). The median OS was similar in both treatment groups (9.7 vs. 9.3 months, p = 0.324). Similarly, no significant difference in one-year PFS was found between HFRT and CFRT (19.8% vs. 16.6%, p = 0.82), with comparable median PFS (9.3 vs. 9.4 months, p = 0.20). In meta-regression analysis, there was no association of chemotherapy (p > 0.05) or radiation biologically effective dose (BED) (p > 0.05) regarding OS or PFS outcomes. There were no significant differences in treatment-related toxicities.

Conclusions: HFRT yields one-year OS and PFS rates similar to CFRT in DIPG, with no significant differences in treatment-related toxicities. Chemotherapy and BED did not affect OS or PFS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥漫性桥脑胶质瘤低分次放疗与传统分次放疗的疗效和安全性:系统综述与荟萃分析。
背景:弥漫性桥脑胶质瘤(DIPG)是脑干胶质瘤的主要类型。它的特点是中位生存期很短,大多数患者在放疗后六个月内疾病进展。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估低分次放射治疗(HFRT)与常规分次放射治疗(CFRT)相比在DIPG治疗中的有效性和安全性:在四个数据库中进行了系统性文献检索,纳入了比较HFRT和CFRT治疗DIPG的相关研究。提取数据并分析总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和治疗相关毒性反应。采用随机效应模型进行统计分析,并进行异质性评估:结果:五项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入 518 名患者。HFRT和CFRT的一年OS无明显差异(29% vs. 22%,P = 0.94)。两个治疗组的中位 OS 相似(9.7 个月 vs. 9.3 个月,p = 0.324)。同样,HFRT 和 CFRT 的一年生存期也无明显差异(19.8% vs. 16.6%,p = 0.82),中位生存期也相当(9.3 vs. 9.4 个月,p = 0.20)。在元回归分析中,化疗(p > 0.05)或放射生物有效剂量(BED)(p > 0.05)与OS或PFS结果没有关联。治疗相关毒性无明显差异:结论:HFRT在DIPG中的一年OS和PFS率与CFRT相似,治疗相关毒性无显著差异。化疗和BED对OS和PFS没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
期刊最新文献
Prehabilitation approaches for gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a narrative review. Reirradiation of gliomas with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: efficacy and tolerance analysis at a single center. Tracing prostate cancer - the evolution of PET-CT applications. Treatment of oropharyngeal cancer during the COVID-19 lockdown - outcomes for patients treated during the pandemic. Can the reprogrammed cancer cells serve as an alternative source of (induced) cancer stem cells?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1