Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5014/ajot.2024.050669
Jennifer Kaldenberg, Theresa Delbert
{"title":"Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jennifer Kaldenberg, Theresa Delbert","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>As identified in the American Occupational Therapy Association's (AOTA's; 2023) statement about the purpose and value of the occupational therapy doctoral capstone, there is a lack of evidence about the purpose and value of the doctoral capstone. As an essential element of occupational therapy doctoral degree curricula, the capstone is unique to each program, supports the program's scholarship agenda, and serves the needs of students and the communities served by the profession.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a doctoral capstone research agenda in an attempt to prioritize and guide research that can supplement the current paucity of evidence related to capstone efficacy or effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were used to conduct a scoping review. Peer-reviewed articles published between 1999 and June 2023 were searched using the CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The doctoral capstone research agenda was developed and organized into five categories to drive research activities inclusive of the didactic and experiential learning associated with the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the capstone process: (1) teaching and learning; (2) learner characteristics and competencies; (3) shaping professional identity; (4) faculty/mentor development and resources; and (5) promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>A doctoral capstone research agenda was developed in accordance with AOTA's (2018) Occupational Therapy Education Research Agenda. It identifies an array of areas in which research is needed to inform the distinct value and purpose of the doctoral capstone to students, sites, programs, and the profession. Plain-Language Summary: The occupational therapy doctoral capstone is unique to each program, supports the program's scholarship agenda, and supports the needs of students and the communities served by the profession. The American Occupational Therapy Association's official document on the \"Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone: Purpose and Value\" states that there is a lack of evidence about how to identify the distinct purpose and value of the doctoral capstone. This scoping review explored the development of a doctoral capstone research agenda. A research agenda is provided to guide and prioritize research to articulate best practices and the distinct purpose and value of the doctoral capstone in occupational therapy education and for the profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"78 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: As identified in the American Occupational Therapy Association's (AOTA's; 2023) statement about the purpose and value of the occupational therapy doctoral capstone, there is a lack of evidence about the purpose and value of the doctoral capstone. As an essential element of occupational therapy doctoral degree curricula, the capstone is unique to each program, supports the program's scholarship agenda, and serves the needs of students and the communities served by the profession.

Objective: To develop a doctoral capstone research agenda in an attempt to prioritize and guide research that can supplement the current paucity of evidence related to capstone efficacy or effectiveness.

Method: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were used to conduct a scoping review. Peer-reviewed articles published between 1999 and June 2023 were searched using the CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase databases.

Results: The doctoral capstone research agenda was developed and organized into five categories to drive research activities inclusive of the didactic and experiential learning associated with the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the capstone process: (1) teaching and learning; (2) learner characteristics and competencies; (3) shaping professional identity; (4) faculty/mentor development and resources; and (5) promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Conclusions and relevance: A doctoral capstone research agenda was developed in accordance with AOTA's (2018) Occupational Therapy Education Research Agenda. It identifies an array of areas in which research is needed to inform the distinct value and purpose of the doctoral capstone to students, sites, programs, and the profession. Plain-Language Summary: The occupational therapy doctoral capstone is unique to each program, supports the program's scholarship agenda, and supports the needs of students and the communities served by the profession. The American Occupational Therapy Association's official document on the "Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone: Purpose and Value" states that there is a lack of evidence about how to identify the distinct purpose and value of the doctoral capstone. This scoping review explored the development of a doctoral capstone research agenda. A research agenda is provided to guide and prioritize research to articulate best practices and the distinct purpose and value of the doctoral capstone in occupational therapy education and for the profession.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业治疗博士毕业研究议程:范围审查。
重要性:正如美国职业治疗协会(AOTA's; 2023)关于职业治疗博士毕业设计的目的和价值的声明中所指出的,目前还缺乏关于博士毕业设计的目的和价值的证据。作为职业治疗博士学位课程的一个基本要素,毕业设计对每个项目来说都是独一无二的,它支持项目的学术议程,并服务于学生和职业所服务社区的需求:目的:制定博士毕业设计研究议程,以确定优先次序并指导研究,从而补充目前与毕业设计功效或效果相关的证据的不足:方法:采用《系统综述和Meta分析的首选报告项目》和《范围界定综述的扩展》指南进行范围界定综述。使用 CINAHL、PsycINFO、PubMed 和 Embase 数据库检索了 1999 年至 2023 年 6 月间发表的同行评审文章:制定了博士毕业设计研究议程,并将其分为五类,以推动与毕业设计过程的规划、实施和评估相关的教学和体验式学习的研究活动:(1) 教学;(2) 学习者的特点和能力;(3) 塑造专业身份;(4) 教师/导师的发展和资源;(5) 促进多样性、公平性和包容性:根据美国职业治疗师协会(AOTA)(2018 年)职业治疗教育研究议程,制定了博士毕业设计研究议程。它确定了一系列需要研究的领域,以告知博士毕业设计对学生、教学点、项目和专业的独特价值和目的。通俗易懂的摘要:职业疗法博士毕业设计对每个项目来说都是独一无二的,它支持项目的学术议程,并满足学生和该专业所服务社区的需求。美国职业治疗协会关于 "职业治疗博士毕业设计 "的官方文件《职业治疗博士毕业设计的目的与价值》指出,"毕业设计是职业治疗专业的一个重要组成部分:目的和价值 "的官方文件中指出,关于如何确定博士毕业设计的独特目的和价值,目前还缺乏证据。本次范围界定审查探讨了博士毕业设计研究议程的制定。研究议程旨在指导研究并确定研究的优先次序,以阐明最佳实践以及职业治疗教育和职业界博士毕业设计的独特目的和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
期刊最新文献
Metacognitive Intervention Facilitating a Growth Mindset for Youth at Risk: The Contribution of Occupational Therapy Practitioners to the Educational Team. Occupational Balance and Meaning Mediate Higher Education Students' Mental Health During War: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Impact of a Dynamic Orthosis on Manual Dexterity Among People With Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Trial. Occupational Therapy Using Ayres Sensory Integration® in School-Based Practice: A Call to Action. Older Adults' Engagement in Meaningful Activities and Quality of Life During COVID-19: A Mixed-Methods Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1