The experience of hope in dyads living with advanced chronic illness in Portugal: a longitudinal mixed-methods study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01528-x
Filipa Baptista Peixoto Befecadu, Maria Gonçalves, Cláudia Fernandes, Carlos Laranjeira, Maria Dos Anjos Dixe, Ana Querido, Sophie Pautex, Philip J Larkin, Gora Da Rocha Rodrigues
{"title":"The experience of hope in dyads living with advanced chronic illness in Portugal: a longitudinal mixed-methods study.","authors":"Filipa Baptista Peixoto Befecadu, Maria Gonçalves, Cláudia Fernandes, Carlos Laranjeira, Maria Dos Anjos Dixe, Ana Querido, Sophie Pautex, Philip J Larkin, Gora Da Rocha Rodrigues","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01528-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hope is an important resource that helps patients and families thrive during difficult times. Although several studies have highlighted the importance of hope in different contexts, its specific manifestations in the realm of advanced chronic illness need further exploration. In this study, we sought to elucidate the intricate interplay between the construct of hope and the lived experience of advanced chronic illness within patient-caregiver dyads. Our objectives were (a) to explore the dyadic experience of hope as a changing dynamic over time for patients living with advanced chronic illness and their informal caregivers and (b) to evaluate variations of hope and symptom burden across time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal mixed-methods study with a convergent design between December 2020 and April 2021. Patients living with advanced chronic illness and informal caregivers participated as a dyad (n = 8). The Herth Hope Index scale was used to measure dyads' level of hope and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System was used to measure patients' symptom burden. Descriptive statistics were undertaken. A thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke was conducted to analyze dyadic interview data. Dyads' experience of hope was described by using the six dimensions of hope in the Model of Hope of Dufault and Martocchio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dyadic scores of hope and patients' symptom burden were stable over time. The constructs of hope in dyads included \"Living one day at the time,\" \"Having inner force/strength,\" and \"Maintaining good health.\" Changes in patterns of hope were captured for each dyad in their transition over time. Data converged for all dyads except one.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of our study show a constant presence of hope even in the face of adversity. Healthcare professionals must find ways to promote hope in dyads of patients living with advanced chronic diseases. Nurses play a pivotal role; dyadic interviews should be promoted to create a safe space for both patients and informal caregivers in order to share experiences. More research is needed to address patients' and informal caregivers' hope in chronic illness because current hope-based interventions primarily target cancer diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01528-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hope is an important resource that helps patients and families thrive during difficult times. Although several studies have highlighted the importance of hope in different contexts, its specific manifestations in the realm of advanced chronic illness need further exploration. In this study, we sought to elucidate the intricate interplay between the construct of hope and the lived experience of advanced chronic illness within patient-caregiver dyads. Our objectives were (a) to explore the dyadic experience of hope as a changing dynamic over time for patients living with advanced chronic illness and their informal caregivers and (b) to evaluate variations of hope and symptom burden across time.

Methods: We conducted a longitudinal mixed-methods study with a convergent design between December 2020 and April 2021. Patients living with advanced chronic illness and informal caregivers participated as a dyad (n = 8). The Herth Hope Index scale was used to measure dyads' level of hope and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System was used to measure patients' symptom burden. Descriptive statistics were undertaken. A thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke was conducted to analyze dyadic interview data. Dyads' experience of hope was described by using the six dimensions of hope in the Model of Hope of Dufault and Martocchio.

Results: Dyadic scores of hope and patients' symptom burden were stable over time. The constructs of hope in dyads included "Living one day at the time," "Having inner force/strength," and "Maintaining good health." Changes in patterns of hope were captured for each dyad in their transition over time. Data converged for all dyads except one.

Conclusions: The findings of our study show a constant presence of hope even in the face of adversity. Healthcare professionals must find ways to promote hope in dyads of patients living with advanced chronic diseases. Nurses play a pivotal role; dyadic interviews should be promoted to create a safe space for both patients and informal caregivers in order to share experiences. More research is needed to address patients' and informal caregivers' hope in chronic illness because current hope-based interventions primarily target cancer diagnoses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙晚期慢性病患者的希望体验:一项纵向混合方法研究。
背景:希望是一种重要的资源,可以帮助病人和家庭在困难时期茁壮成长。虽然已有多项研究强调了希望在不同情况下的重要性,但希望在晚期慢性病领域的具体表现还需要进一步探讨。在本研究中,我们试图阐明在病人-护理者二元组合中,希望的构建与晚期慢性病生活体验之间错综复杂的相互作用。我们的目标是:(a) 探索晚期慢性病患者及其非正规护理者对希望的二元体验随着时间的推移而不断变化的动态;(b) 评估希望和症状负担随着时间的推移而产生的变化:我们在 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 4 月期间开展了一项采用趋同设计的纵向混合方法研究。晚期慢性病患者和非正规护理人员作为二人组(n = 8)参与了研究。研究采用赫氏希望指数量表来衡量双方的希望水平,并采用埃德蒙顿症状评估系统来衡量患者的症状负担。研究人员进行了描述性统计。布劳恩(Braun)和克拉克(Clarke)采用了主题分析法来分析两人一组的访谈数据。通过使用 Dufault 和 Martocchio 的希望模型中的六个希望维度来描述患者的希望体验:结果:随着时间的推移,患者的希望得分和症状负担保持稳定。二人组的希望结构包括 "过一天算一天"、"拥有内在力量 "和 "保持健康"。每个双人组的希望模式都随着时间的推移发生了变化。结论:我们的研究结果表明,希望模式的变化是恒定的:我们的研究结果表明,即使在逆境中,希望依然存在。医护人员必须想方设法提高晚期慢性病患者的希望。护士在其中扮演着关键的角色;应推广双亲访谈,为患者和非正式护理人员创造一个安全的空间,以分享经验。由于目前以希望为基础的干预措施主要针对癌症诊断,因此需要开展更多研究来解决慢性病患者和非正规护理人员的希望问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Communication about incurable illness and remaining life between spouses and patients with incurable illness receiving specialized home care: effects of a family caregiver-targeted web-based psycho-educational intervention. Correction: Adapting the serious illness conversation guide for unhoused older adults: a rapid qualitative study. Online education in palliative care - A national exploratory multimethod study. The family talk intervention prevent the feeling of loneliness - a long term follow up after a parents life-threatening illness. Is the use of antibiotic stewardship measures in the context of specialized outpatient palliative care sensible and feasible? An interview-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1