Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy on Patient-Selected Lesions Concerning for Skin Cancer.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230256R2
Miguel Tepedino, David Baltazar, Karim Hanna, Alina Bridges, Laurent Billot, Nathalie C Zeitouni
{"title":"Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy on Patient-Selected Lesions Concerning for Skin Cancer.","authors":"Miguel Tepedino, David Baltazar, Karim Hanna, Alina Bridges, Laurent Billot, Nathalie C Zeitouni","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230256R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to dermatologists is limited in parts of the US, making primary care clinicians (PCCs) integral for early detection of skin cancers. A handheld device using elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) was developed to aid PCCs in their clinical assessment of skin lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 3 PCCs evaluated skin lesions reported by patients as concerning and scanned each lesion with the handheld ESS device. The comparison was pathology results or a 3-dermatologist panel examining high resolution dermatoscopic and clinical images. PCCs reported their diagnosis, management decision, and confidence level for each lesion. Evaluation of results included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Area Under the Curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 155 patients and 178 lesions were included in the final analysis. The most commonly patient-reported concerning feature was \"new or changing lesion\" (91.6%). Device diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 90.0% and 60.7%, respectively, based on biopsy result or dermatologist panel reference standard; comparatively, PCC sensitivity was 40.0% and 84.8% specificity without the use of the device. Device NPV was 98.9%, and device PPV was 13.6%. The device recommended patient referral to dermatology with 88.2% concordance with the dermatologist panel. AUC for the device and PCCs were 0.815 and 0.643, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the ESS device by PCCs can improve diagnostic and management sensitivity for select malignant skin lesions by correctly classifying most benign lesions of patient concern. This may increase skin cancer detection while improving access to specialist care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 3","pages":"427-435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230256R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to dermatologists is limited in parts of the US, making primary care clinicians (PCCs) integral for early detection of skin cancers. A handheld device using elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) was developed to aid PCCs in their clinical assessment of skin lesions.

Methods: In this prospective study, 3 PCCs evaluated skin lesions reported by patients as concerning and scanned each lesion with the handheld ESS device. The comparison was pathology results or a 3-dermatologist panel examining high resolution dermatoscopic and clinical images. PCCs reported their diagnosis, management decision, and confidence level for each lesion. Evaluation of results included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Area Under the Curve (AUC).

Results: A total of 155 patients and 178 lesions were included in the final analysis. The most commonly patient-reported concerning feature was "new or changing lesion" (91.6%). Device diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 90.0% and 60.7%, respectively, based on biopsy result or dermatologist panel reference standard; comparatively, PCC sensitivity was 40.0% and 84.8% specificity without the use of the device. Device NPV was 98.9%, and device PPV was 13.6%. The device recommended patient referral to dermatology with 88.2% concordance with the dermatologist panel. AUC for the device and PCCs were 0.815 and 0.643, respectively.

Conclusions: The use of the ESS device by PCCs can improve diagnostic and management sensitivity for select malignant skin lesions by correctly classifying most benign lesions of patient concern. This may increase skin cancer detection while improving access to specialist care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对患者选定的皮肤癌病变进行弹性散射光谱分析
背景:在美国部分地区,皮肤科医生的门诊量有限,因此初级保健临床医生(PCC)在皮肤癌的早期检测中不可或缺。我们开发了一种使用弹性散射光谱(ESS)的手持设备,以帮助初级保健临床医生对皮肤病变进行临床评估:在这项前瞻性研究中,3 名 PCC 对患者报告的皮肤病变进行了评估,并使用手持式 ESS 设备对每个病变进行了扫描。比较的结果是病理结果或由 3 位皮肤科医生组成的小组对高分辨率皮肤镜和临床图像进行检查。PCC 报告他们对每个病变的诊断、处理决定和置信度。结果评估包括灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和曲线下面积(AUC):共有 155 名患者和 178 个病灶被纳入最终分析。患者最常报告的相关特征是 "新病变或病变改变"(91.6%)。根据活检结果或皮肤科专家小组参考标准,设备诊断灵敏度和特异性分别为 90.0% 和 60.7%;相比之下,不使用设备的 PCC 灵敏度为 40.0%,特异性为 84.8%。设备的 NPV 为 98.9%,设备的 PPV 为 13.6%。该设备建议患者转诊至皮肤科,与皮肤科专家小组的一致性为 88.2%。设备和 PCC 的 AUC 分别为 0.815 和 0.643:结论:PCC 使用 ESS 设备可以正确分类患者关注的大多数良性病变,从而提高对特定恶性皮肤病变的诊断和管理灵敏度。这可能会提高皮肤癌的检出率,同时改善专科护理的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1