Recent Innovations in Primary Care Cancer Survivorship Roles.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230223R1
Jennifer R Hemler, Benjamin F Crabtree, Denalee O'Malley, Jenna Howard, Lisa Mikesell, Rachel Kurtzman, Benjamin Bates, Shawna V Hudson
{"title":"Recent Innovations in Primary Care Cancer Survivorship Roles.","authors":"Jennifer R Hemler, Benjamin F Crabtree, Denalee O'Malley, Jenna Howard, Lisa Mikesell, Rachel Kurtzman, Benjamin Bates, Shawna V Hudson","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230223R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite 2 decades of cancer survivorship research, policy, and advocacy, primary care in the United States has not fully integrated survivorship care into its generalist role. This manuscript describes innovative roles primary care physicians have adopted in survivorship care and how these roles emerged.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 10 US primary care physician innovators in survivorship care. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Our team met weekly as interviews were completed to review transcripts and write summaries. We analyzed data using an immersion-crystallization process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Innovators did not receive formal survivorship training but gained knowledge experientially and through self-guided education. All worked in academic primary care and/or cancer centers; context strongly influenced role operationalization. We delineated 4 major role-types along a spectrum, with primary care generalist orientations at one end and cancer generalist orientations at the other. Primary care generalists applied survivorship guidelines during regular visits (\"GENERALISTS+\") or focused on cancer treatment effects amid other comorbidities during blocked clinic time (\"oncoGENERALISTS\"). Cancer generalists focused on cancer-related sequalae during and after treatment; some provided continuity care to survivors (\"ONCOGENERALISTS\"), while others incorporated unmet primary care needs into survivorship consults (\"ONCOgeneralists\").</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care survivorship innovations are occurring in academic primary care and cancer centers settings in the US. To move beyond the work of individual innovators, systematic investments are needed to support adoption of such innovations. For wider diffusion of survivorship care into community primary care, additional strategies that include primary care survivorship education and workforce development are needed to facilitate risk-stratified and shared-care models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 3","pages":"399-408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230223R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite 2 decades of cancer survivorship research, policy, and advocacy, primary care in the United States has not fully integrated survivorship care into its generalist role. This manuscript describes innovative roles primary care physicians have adopted in survivorship care and how these roles emerged.

Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 10 US primary care physician innovators in survivorship care. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Our team met weekly as interviews were completed to review transcripts and write summaries. We analyzed data using an immersion-crystallization process.

Results: Innovators did not receive formal survivorship training but gained knowledge experientially and through self-guided education. All worked in academic primary care and/or cancer centers; context strongly influenced role operationalization. We delineated 4 major role-types along a spectrum, with primary care generalist orientations at one end and cancer generalist orientations at the other. Primary care generalists applied survivorship guidelines during regular visits ("GENERALISTS+") or focused on cancer treatment effects amid other comorbidities during blocked clinic time ("oncoGENERALISTS"). Cancer generalists focused on cancer-related sequalae during and after treatment; some provided continuity care to survivors ("ONCOGENERALISTS"), while others incorporated unmet primary care needs into survivorship consults ("ONCOgeneralists").

Conclusions: Primary care survivorship innovations are occurring in academic primary care and cancer centers settings in the US. To move beyond the work of individual innovators, systematic investments are needed to support adoption of such innovations. For wider diffusion of survivorship care into community primary care, additional strategies that include primary care survivorship education and workforce development are needed to facilitate risk-stratified and shared-care models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症幸存者初级保健角色的最新创新。
背景:尽管对癌症幸存者的研究、政策和宣传已有 20 年之久,但美国的初级保健仍未将幸存者护理完全融入其全科医生的角色中。这篇手稿描述了初级保健医生在幸存者关怀中扮演的创新角色,以及这些角色是如何产生的:我们以滚雪球的方式抽取了 10 名美国全科医生中的幸存者护理创新者,对他们进行了深入的定性访谈。我们对访谈进行了录音和专业转录。访谈结束后,我们的团队每周召开一次会议,审阅访谈记录并撰写摘要。我们采用沉浸-结晶过程分析数据:创新者没有接受过正规的幸存者培训,但通过经验和自我指导教育获得了知识。所有创新者都在学术性初级保健中心和/或癌症中心工作;环境对角色的可操作性有很大影响。我们沿着一个谱系划分出 4 种主要角色类型,一端是初级保健全科医生,另一端是癌症全科医生。全科医生在定期出诊时应用幸存者指南("GENERALISTS+"),或在被封锁的门诊时间内专注于癌症治疗效果和其他合并症("oncoGENERALISTS")。癌症全科医生侧重于治疗期间和治疗后与癌症相关的后遗症;一些全科医生为幸存者提供连续性护理("ONCOGENERALISTS"),而另一些全科医生则将未满足的初级保健需求纳入幸存者咨询("ONCOgeneralists"):结论:美国的学术性初级保健和癌症中心正在进行幸存者初级保健创新。为了超越单个创新者的工作,需要进行系统性投资,以支持此类创新的采用。为了将幸存者护理更广泛地推广到社区初级保健中,需要制定包括初级保健幸存者教育和劳动力发展在内的其他战略,以促进风险分层和共享护理模式的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1