Relationship Between Primary Care Physician Capacity and Usual Source of Care.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230400R1
Michael Topmiller, Hannah Shadowen, Hoon Byun, Mark Carrozza, Jeongyoung Park, Yalda Jabbarpour, Alison Huffstetler
{"title":"Relationship Between Primary Care Physician Capacity and Usual Source of Care.","authors":"Michael Topmiller, Hannah Shadowen, Hoon Byun, Mark Carrozza, Jeongyoung Park, Yalda Jabbarpour, Alison Huffstetler","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230400R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The NASEM Primary Care Report and Primary Care scorecard highlighted the importance of primary care physician (PCP) capacity and having a usual source of care (USC). However, research has found that PCP capacity and USC do not always correlate. This exploratory study compares geographic patterns and the characteristics of counties with similar rates of PCP capacity but varying rates of USC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our county-level, cross-sectional approach includes estimates from the Robert Graham Center and data from the Robert Wood Johnson County Health Rankings (CHR). We utilized conditional mapping methods to first identify US counties with the highest rates of social deprivation (SDI). Next, counties were stratified based on primary care physician (PCP) capacity and usual source of care (USC) terciles, allowing us to identify 4 types of counties: (1) High-Low (high PCP capacity, low USC); (2) High-High (high PCP capacity, high USC); (3) Low-High (low PCP capacity, high USC); and (4) Low-Low (low PCP capacity, low USC). We use <i>t</i> test to explore differences in the characteristics of counties with similar rates of primary care capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show clear geographic patterns: High-High counties are located primarily in the northern and northeastern US; High-Low counties are located primarily in the southwestern and southern US. Low-High counties are concentrated in the Appalachian and Great Lakes regions; Low-Low counties are concentrated in the southeastern US and Texas. Descriptive results reveal that rates of racial and ethnic minorities, the uninsured, and social deprivation are highest in counties with low rates of USC for both high PCP and low PCP areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recognizing PCP shortages and improving rates of USC are key strategies for increasing access to high-quality, primary care. Targeting strategies by geographic region will allow for tailored models to improve access to and continuity of primary care. For example, we found that many of the counties with the lowest rates of USC are found in non-Medicaid expansion states (Texas, Georgia, and Florida) with high rates of uninsured populations, suggesting that expanding Medicaid and improving access to health insurance are key strategies for increasing USC in these states.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 3","pages":"436-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230400R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The NASEM Primary Care Report and Primary Care scorecard highlighted the importance of primary care physician (PCP) capacity and having a usual source of care (USC). However, research has found that PCP capacity and USC do not always correlate. This exploratory study compares geographic patterns and the characteristics of counties with similar rates of PCP capacity but varying rates of USC.

Methods: Our county-level, cross-sectional approach includes estimates from the Robert Graham Center and data from the Robert Wood Johnson County Health Rankings (CHR). We utilized conditional mapping methods to first identify US counties with the highest rates of social deprivation (SDI). Next, counties were stratified based on primary care physician (PCP) capacity and usual source of care (USC) terciles, allowing us to identify 4 types of counties: (1) High-Low (high PCP capacity, low USC); (2) High-High (high PCP capacity, high USC); (3) Low-High (low PCP capacity, high USC); and (4) Low-Low (low PCP capacity, low USC). We use t test to explore differences in the characteristics of counties with similar rates of primary care capacity.

Results: The results show clear geographic patterns: High-High counties are located primarily in the northern and northeastern US; High-Low counties are located primarily in the southwestern and southern US. Low-High counties are concentrated in the Appalachian and Great Lakes regions; Low-Low counties are concentrated in the southeastern US and Texas. Descriptive results reveal that rates of racial and ethnic minorities, the uninsured, and social deprivation are highest in counties with low rates of USC for both high PCP and low PCP areas.

Conclusions: Recognizing PCP shortages and improving rates of USC are key strategies for increasing access to high-quality, primary care. Targeting strategies by geographic region will allow for tailored models to improve access to and continuity of primary care. For example, we found that many of the counties with the lowest rates of USC are found in non-Medicaid expansion states (Texas, Georgia, and Florida) with high rates of uninsured populations, suggesting that expanding Medicaid and improving access to health insurance are key strategies for increasing USC in these states.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健医生能力与惯常保健来源之间的关系。
背景:NASEM 初级医疗报告和初级医疗记分卡强调了初级保健医生 (PCP) 能力和拥有惯常医疗来源 (USC) 的重要性。然而,研究发现初级保健医生的能力和常去的医疗机构并不总是相关的。这项探索性研究比较了具有相似初级保健医生能力但拥有不同 USC 比率的县的地理模式和特征:我们的县级横截面方法包括罗伯特-格雷厄姆中心(Robert Graham Center)的估计数据和罗伯特-伍德-约翰逊县健康排名(CHR)的数据。我们利用条件映射法首先确定了美国社会贫困率(SDI)最高的县。然后,根据初级保健医生(PCP)能力和通常护理来源(USC)三等分对各县进行分层,从而确定了四种类型的县:(1) 高-低(初级保健医生能力高,USC 低);(2) 高-高(初级保健医生能力高,USC 高);(3) 低-高(初级保健医生能力低,USC 高);(4) 低-低(初级保健医生能力低,USC 低)。我们使用 t 检验来探讨初级保健能力相似的县的特征差异:结果显示出明显的地理模式:高-高县主要位于美国北部和东北部;高-低县主要位于美国西南部和南部。低高县主要集中在阿巴拉契亚和五大湖地区;低低县主要集中在美国东南部和得克萨斯州。描述性结果显示,在初级保健医生比例高的地区和初级保健医生比例低的地区,种族和民族少数群体、未参保者和社会贫困人口的比例最高:结论:认识到初级保健医生的短缺并提高全科医生的比例是增加高质量初级保健服务的关键策略。按地理区域确定战略目标将允许采用量身定制的模式来改善初级保健的可及性和连续性。例如,我们发现许多全科覆盖率最低的县位于未扩大医疗补助计划的州(得克萨斯州、佐治亚州和佛罗里达州),这些州的无保险人口比例较高,这表明扩大医疗补助计划和改善医疗保险的获取是这些州增加全科覆盖率的关键策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1