Rucha K Borkhetaria, Zain S Hussain, Vanna Giang, Amanda L Ely
{"title":"Predictors of No-Show Status: An Analysis of Pediatric Ophthalmology Patients at an Academic Ophthalmology Department in the United States.","authors":"Rucha K Borkhetaria, Zain S Hussain, Vanna Giang, Amanda L Ely","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20240718-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify pediatric patient and appointment characteristics associated with no-show status at a tertiary care pediatric ophthalmology clinic within a U.S. academic ophthalmology department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional retrospective chart review was performed for all pediatric patients with a scheduled ophthalmology appointment at the Penn State Eye Center between April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023. A multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed associations between appointment nonattendance and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8,083 scheduled visits, 1,445 (17.9%) were no-shows. Factors associated with no-show status included appointment type (new vs return odds ratio [OR]: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.63, <i>P</i> < .001); lower median household income (< $41,374 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.55, <i>P</i> < .001; $41,374 to $68,957 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.44, <i>P</i> < .001); non-private insurance (self-pay vs private: OR: 5.65, 95% CI: 3.87 to 8.24, <i>P</i> < .001, Medicaid vs private: OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 2.32 to 3.16, <i>P</i> < .001); commute distance 10 to 30 miles vs < 5 miles (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.99, <i>P</i> = .008); race: unavailable vs White (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.85, <i>P</i> < .001), Black vs White (OR: 1.86, 95% CI:1.53 to 2.27, <i>P</i> < .001), Other vs White (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.70, <i>P</i> < .001); ethnicity: Hispanic vs non-Hispanic (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.27, <i>P</i> < .001); and language preference: Spanish vs English (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.32, <i>P</i> < .001), Nepali vs English (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.43, <i>P</i> = .027), other vs English (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.49, <i>P</i> < .001). Appointment reminders (phone call, <i>P</i> = .013); text message, <i>P</i> < .001; other, <i>P</i> = .013) all resulted in a greater propensity to show, but email communication alone did not (<i>P</i> = .674).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Certain patient and appointment characteristics that are linked to a higher rate of no-show status can inform targeted initiatives to improve health care outcomes, resource utilization, and clinical efficiency in the pediatric ophthalmology community. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 2024;61(6):442-451.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"442-451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20240718-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To identify pediatric patient and appointment characteristics associated with no-show status at a tertiary care pediatric ophthalmology clinic within a U.S. academic ophthalmology department.
Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective chart review was performed for all pediatric patients with a scheduled ophthalmology appointment at the Penn State Eye Center between April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023. A multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed associations between appointment nonattendance and patient characteristics.
Results: Of 8,083 scheduled visits, 1,445 (17.9%) were no-shows. Factors associated with no-show status included appointment type (new vs return odds ratio [OR]: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.63, P < .001); lower median household income (< $41,374 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.55, P < .001; $41,374 to $68,957 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.44, P < .001); non-private insurance (self-pay vs private: OR: 5.65, 95% CI: 3.87 to 8.24, P < .001, Medicaid vs private: OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 2.32 to 3.16, P < .001); commute distance 10 to 30 miles vs < 5 miles (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.99, P = .008); race: unavailable vs White (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.85, P < .001), Black vs White (OR: 1.86, 95% CI:1.53 to 2.27, P < .001), Other vs White (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.70, P < .001); ethnicity: Hispanic vs non-Hispanic (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.27, P < .001); and language preference: Spanish vs English (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.32, P < .001), Nepali vs English (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.43, P = .027), other vs English (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.49, P < .001). Appointment reminders (phone call, P = .013); text message, P < .001; other, P = .013) all resulted in a greater propensity to show, but email communication alone did not (P = .674).
Conclusions: Certain patient and appointment characteristics that are linked to a higher rate of no-show status can inform targeted initiatives to improve health care outcomes, resource utilization, and clinical efficiency in the pediatric ophthalmology community. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(6):442-451.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.