Electrodermal lability and sensorimotor preparation: effects on reaction time, contingent negative variation, and heart rate.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.3758/s13415-024-01206-8
Heinz Zimmer, Fabian Richter
{"title":"Electrodermal lability and sensorimotor preparation: effects on reaction time, contingent negative variation, and heart rate.","authors":"Heinz Zimmer, Fabian Richter","doi":"10.3758/s13415-024-01206-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrodermal lability is a trait-like measure of spontaneous sympathetic resting activity. In the present study, we addressed whether interindividual differences in this lability have an impact on the reaction time (RT) and on two physiological indicators of a goal-oriented sensorimotor preparation in a long-running, forewarned RT task (S1-S2 paradigm). The two indicators were the brain's contingent negative variation (CNV) and a heart rate deceleration (HRD). The interindividual differences were determined by counting spontaneous skin conductance fluctuations during a 5-min resting phase and dividing the subjects into two groups: individuals below (stable) and above (labile) the median of these fluctuations. In the task, labile individuals had a shorter RT compared with stable individuals and showed in the final phase of preparation in both physiological indicators the stronger response. Thus, lability-dependent effects in forewarned RT tasks cannot be explained by differences in stimulus-driven or passively controlled processes alone. Rather, goal-oriented, deliberately controlled processes that serve to adequately prepare for an imperative stimulus-the S2 in our paradigm-also must be considered to explain them. Labile individuals not only react faster than stable ones but also intentionally prepare themselves more appropriately for the imperative stimulus. A norepinephrine hypothesis focusing on the tonic activity of the locus coeruleus (LC) is proposed as an explanation for these and other lability-dependent effects. The frequency of spontaneous electrodermal fluctuations at rest may represent a peripheral, noninvasive, and easily measurable indicator of the baseline LC activity during wakefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01206-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrodermal lability is a trait-like measure of spontaneous sympathetic resting activity. In the present study, we addressed whether interindividual differences in this lability have an impact on the reaction time (RT) and on two physiological indicators of a goal-oriented sensorimotor preparation in a long-running, forewarned RT task (S1-S2 paradigm). The two indicators were the brain's contingent negative variation (CNV) and a heart rate deceleration (HRD). The interindividual differences were determined by counting spontaneous skin conductance fluctuations during a 5-min resting phase and dividing the subjects into two groups: individuals below (stable) and above (labile) the median of these fluctuations. In the task, labile individuals had a shorter RT compared with stable individuals and showed in the final phase of preparation in both physiological indicators the stronger response. Thus, lability-dependent effects in forewarned RT tasks cannot be explained by differences in stimulus-driven or passively controlled processes alone. Rather, goal-oriented, deliberately controlled processes that serve to adequately prepare for an imperative stimulus-the S2 in our paradigm-also must be considered to explain them. Labile individuals not only react faster than stable ones but also intentionally prepare themselves more appropriately for the imperative stimulus. A norepinephrine hypothesis focusing on the tonic activity of the locus coeruleus (LC) is proposed as an explanation for these and other lability-dependent effects. The frequency of spontaneous electrodermal fluctuations at rest may represent a peripheral, noninvasive, and easily measurable indicator of the baseline LC activity during wakefulness.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮电不稳定性和感觉运动准备:对反应时间、或然性负变异和心率的影响。
皮电不稳定性是自发交感神经静息活动的一种类似特质的测量方法。在本研究中,我们探讨了这种不稳定性的个体差异是否会影响反应时间(RT),以及在一个长期的、预先警告的 RT 任务(S1-S2 范式)中目标导向的感觉运动准备的两个生理指标。这两个指标分别是大脑或然负变异(CNV)和心率减速(HRD)。确定个体间差异的方法是计算 5 分钟静息阶段的自发皮肤电导波动,并将受试者分为两组:低于(稳定)和高于(易受影响)波动中值的个体。在任务中,易感者的反应时间比稳定者短,并且在准备的最后阶段,两种生理指标都显示出更强的反应。因此,在预知RT任务中,依赖于易感性的效应不能仅仅用刺激驱动或被动控制过程的差异来解释。相反,还必须考虑到目标导向的、有意控制的过程,这些过程的作用是为必须的刺激做好充分准备--在我们的范例中就是 S2--来解释它们。易变个体不仅比稳定个体反应更快,而且会有意识地为强制性刺激做更适当的准备。有人提出了一种去甲肾上腺素假说,该假说的重点是小脑局灶(LC)的强直性活动,以此来解释这些以及其他依赖于不稳定性的效应。静息状态下的自发皮电波动频率可能是清醒状态下LC基线活动的一个外围、非侵入性和易于测量的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The effect of inter-letter spacing on the n170 during visual word recognition: An event-related potentials experiment. Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for studying cognitive control in depressed patients: A systematic review. Abstract task sequence initiation deficit dissociates anxiety disorders from obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy controls. Electrodermal lability and sensorimotor preparation: effects on reaction time, contingent negative variation, and heart rate. The virtual disengagement hypothesis: A neurophysiological framework for reduced empathy on social media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1