Intrafraction Motion in Surface-Guided Breast Radiation Therapy and its Implications on a Single Planning Target Volume Margin Strategy.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Practical Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.017
Ciaran Malone, Samantha Ryan, Jill Nicholson, Orla McArdle, Sinead Brennan, Pat McCavana, Brendan McClean, Frances Duane
{"title":"Intrafraction Motion in Surface-Guided Breast Radiation Therapy and its Implications on a Single Planning Target Volume Margin Strategy.","authors":"Ciaran Malone, Samantha Ryan, Jill Nicholson, Orla McArdle, Sinead Brennan, Pat McCavana, Brendan McClean, Frances Duane","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study quantifies intrafraction motion in surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) for breast cancer and considers the need for individualized intrafraction motion measures when calculating planning target volume (PTV) margins.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>SGRT was used to assess intrafraction motion in consecutive patients according to (1) site irradiated (whole-breast/chest wall vs whole-breast/chest wall + regional lymph nodes) and (2) the use of deep inspiration breath hold versus free breathing. Intrafraction motion variation was evaluated throughout the treatment course for all cases. Associations between intrafraction motion and patient-specific characteristics were explored. The usefulness of individualized intrafraction motion measures for PTV margin determination was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred two patients undergoing 1360 fractions were included. On a population level, average intrafraction motion was less than 0.4 mm and 0.2 degrees for translational and rotational directions, respectively, with 95th percentiles <1.2 mm and 0.6 degrees, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences in intrafraction motion were observed according to the site irradiated or the use of deep inspiration breath hold. Consistency in intrafraction motion was noted for all patients throughout the treatment course. No clinically meaningful associations were found between intrafraction motion and patient-specific characteristics such as age, seroma volume, PTV volume, and mean body volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrafractional deviations with SGRT, using manufacturer-recommended regions of interest, are minimal, do not vary substantially for different treatment techniques or patient-specific characteristics, and remain constant throughout the treatment course. A universal intrafraction motion measure may be sufficient for calculating PTV margins. Further validation studies are needed to evaluate the impact of region of interest size and coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study quantifies intrafraction motion in surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) for breast cancer and considers the need for individualized intrafraction motion measures when calculating planning target volume (PTV) margins.

Methods and materials: SGRT was used to assess intrafraction motion in consecutive patients according to (1) site irradiated (whole-breast/chest wall vs whole-breast/chest wall + regional lymph nodes) and (2) the use of deep inspiration breath hold versus free breathing. Intrafraction motion variation was evaluated throughout the treatment course for all cases. Associations between intrafraction motion and patient-specific characteristics were explored. The usefulness of individualized intrafraction motion measures for PTV margin determination was considered.

Results: One hundred two patients undergoing 1360 fractions were included. On a population level, average intrafraction motion was less than 0.4 mm and 0.2 degrees for translational and rotational directions, respectively, with 95th percentiles <1.2 mm and 0.6 degrees, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences in intrafraction motion were observed according to the site irradiated or the use of deep inspiration breath hold. Consistency in intrafraction motion was noted for all patients throughout the treatment course. No clinically meaningful associations were found between intrafraction motion and patient-specific characteristics such as age, seroma volume, PTV volume, and mean body volume.

Conclusions: Intrafractional deviations with SGRT, using manufacturer-recommended regions of interest, are minimal, do not vary substantially for different treatment techniques or patient-specific characteristics, and remain constant throughout the treatment course. A universal intrafraction motion measure may be sufficient for calculating PTV margins. Further validation studies are needed to evaluate the impact of region of interest size and coverage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面引导乳腺放射治疗中的牵引运动及其对单一 PTV 边缘策略的影响。
背景和目的:本研究量化了乳腺癌体表引导放射治疗(SGRT)中的分射内运动,并考虑了在计算规划靶区(PTV)边缘时对个体化分射内运动测量的需求:方法:使用 SGRT 评估连续患者的分量内运动,根据(1)照射部位(全乳(WB)/胸壁(CW)与 WB/CW + 区域淋巴结)和(2)使用深吸气屏气(DIBH)与自由呼吸(FB)。在整个治疗过程中,对所有病例的牵引运动变化进行了评估。研究还探讨了牵引内运动与患者具体特征之间的关联。研究还考虑了用于确定PTV边缘的个体化牵引内运动测量的实用性:结果:共纳入了102名接受了1360次分割的患者。在总体水平上,平移和旋转方向的平均分段内运动分别小于0.4毫米和0.2度,第95百分位数小于1.2毫米和0.6度。根据照射部位或使用DIBH的不同,没有观察到有临床意义的分段内运动差异。在整个治疗过程中,所有患者的分段内运动均保持一致。分段内运动与患者的具体特征(如年龄、血清肿体积、PTV体积和平均体量)之间没有发现有临床意义的关联:结论:使用制造商推荐的 ROI 进行 SGRT 治疗时,点内偏差极小,不会因不同的治疗技术或患者的具体特征而发生重大变化,并且在整个治疗过程中保持不变。通用的点内运动测量方法可能足以计算 PTV 边界。还需要进一步的验证研究来评估 ROI 大小和覆盖范围的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
期刊最新文献
Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Table of Contents Editorial Board Being an Oncologist—How I Evolved Order From Chaos: The Benefits of Standardized Nomenclature in Radiation Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1