Factors influencing nurse practitioner panel size in team-based primary care: a qualitative case study.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02547-6
Ruth Martin-Misener, Faith Donald, Jennifer Rayner, Nancy Carter, Kelley Kilpatrick, Erin Ziegler, Ivy Bourgeault, Denise Bryant-Lukosius
{"title":"Factors influencing nurse practitioner panel size in team-based primary care: a qualitative case study.","authors":"Ruth Martin-Misener, Faith Donald, Jennifer Rayner, Nancy Carter, Kelley Kilpatrick, Erin Ziegler, Ivy Bourgeault, Denise Bryant-Lukosius","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02547-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lack of access to health care is a worldwide public health crisis. In primary care it has led to increases in the implementation of nurse practitioners and heightened interest in their patient panel capacity. The aim of this study was to examine factors influencing nurse practitioner patient panel size in team-based primary care in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a multiple case study design. Eight team-based primary care practices including rural and urban settings were purposively selected as cases. Each case had two or more nurse practitioners with a minimum of two years experience in the primary care setting. Interviews were conducted in-person, audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants, including 19 nurse practitioners, 16 administrators (inclusive of executives, managers, and receptionists), and 5 physicians were interviewed. Patient, provider, organizational, and system factors influenced nurse practitioner patient panel size. There were eight sub-factors: complexity of patients' health and social needs; holistic nursing model of care; nurse practitioner experience and confidence; composition and functioning of the multidisciplinary team; clerical and administrative supports, and nurse practitioner activities and expectations. All participants found it difficult to identify the panel size of nurse practitioners, calling it- \"a grey area.\" Establishing and maintaining a longitudinal relationship that responded holistically to patients' needs was fundamental to how nurse practitioners provided care. Social factors such as gender, poverty, mental health concerns, historical trauma, marginalisation and literacy contributed to the complexity of patients' needs. Participants indicated NPs tried to address all of a patient's concerns at each visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurse practitioners have a holistic approach that incorporates attention to the social determinants of health as well as acute and chronic comorbidities. This approach compels them to try to address all of the needs a patient is experiencing at each visit and reduces their panel size. Multidisciplinary teams have an opportunity to be deliberate when structuring their services across providers to meet more of the health and social needs of empanelled patients. This could enable increases in nurse practitioner panel size.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02547-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lack of access to health care is a worldwide public health crisis. In primary care it has led to increases in the implementation of nurse practitioners and heightened interest in their patient panel capacity. The aim of this study was to examine factors influencing nurse practitioner patient panel size in team-based primary care in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We used a multiple case study design. Eight team-based primary care practices including rural and urban settings were purposively selected as cases. Each case had two or more nurse practitioners with a minimum of two years experience in the primary care setting. Interviews were conducted in-person, audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using content analysis.

Results: Forty participants, including 19 nurse practitioners, 16 administrators (inclusive of executives, managers, and receptionists), and 5 physicians were interviewed. Patient, provider, organizational, and system factors influenced nurse practitioner patient panel size. There were eight sub-factors: complexity of patients' health and social needs; holistic nursing model of care; nurse practitioner experience and confidence; composition and functioning of the multidisciplinary team; clerical and administrative supports, and nurse practitioner activities and expectations. All participants found it difficult to identify the panel size of nurse practitioners, calling it- "a grey area." Establishing and maintaining a longitudinal relationship that responded holistically to patients' needs was fundamental to how nurse practitioners provided care. Social factors such as gender, poverty, mental health concerns, historical trauma, marginalisation and literacy contributed to the complexity of patients' needs. Participants indicated NPs tried to address all of a patient's concerns at each visit.

Conclusions: Nurse practitioners have a holistic approach that incorporates attention to the social determinants of health as well as acute and chronic comorbidities. This approach compels them to try to address all of the needs a patient is experiencing at each visit and reduces their panel size. Multidisciplinary teams have an opportunity to be deliberate when structuring their services across providers to meet more of the health and social needs of empanelled patients. This could enable increases in nurse practitioner panel size.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以团队为基础的初级保健中影响执业护士小组规模的因素:一项定性案例研究。
背景:无法获得医疗服务是世界性的公共卫生危机。在初级医疗保健领域,这导致执业护士的使用率上升,人们对执业护士的病人数量也更加关注。本研究旨在探讨影响加拿大安大略省以团队为基础的初级保健中执业护士病人小组规模的因素:我们采用了多重案例研究设计。我们有目的地选择了八个以团队为基础的初级医疗实践作为案例,其中包括农村和城市环境。每个案例都有两名或两名以上的执业护士,且在初级医疗机构至少有两年的工作经验。访谈以面谈形式进行,采用内容分析法进行录音、转录和分析:40 名参与者接受了访谈,其中包括 19 名执业护士、16 名管理人员(包括行政人员、经理和接待员)以及 5 名医生。患者、医疗服务提供者、组织和系统因素影响了执业护士患者小组的规模。共有八个子因素:患者健康和社会需求的复杂性;整体护理模式;执业护士的经验和信心;多学科团队的组成和运作;文书和行政支持,以及执业护士的活动和期望。所有与会者都认为很难确定执业护士小组的规模,称其为 "灰色地带"。建立和保持纵向关系,全面满足患者需求,是执业护士提供护理的根本。性别、贫困、心理健康问题、历史创伤、边缘化和文化程度等社会因素导致了患者需求的复杂性。参与者表示,护士在每次就诊时都会努力解决患者的所有问题:执业护师采用综合方法,关注健康的社会决定因素以及急性和慢性并发症。这种方法迫使他们在每次就诊时尽量满足患者的所有需求,并减少了他们的小组人数。多学科团队有机会在跨医疗服务提供者构建服务时深思熟虑,以满足授权病人的更多健康和社会需求。这可以增加执业护士小组的规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-pandemic patient safety: have the characteristics of incidents with harm changed? Comparative observational study in primary care via review of medical records with a trigger tool. Opportunities of integrated care to improve equity for adults with complex needs: a qualitative study of case management in primary care. Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review. Turnover intention and continuing professional development of rural doctors from targeted admission medical education program in China: a cross-sectional study in the post-COVID-19 era. Chronic kidney disease in older adults: challenges and opportunities for the primary care provider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1