Enhancing the quality of medicine handover at hospital discharge: a priority setting workshop.

H Laetitia Hattingh, Kate Johnston, Matt Percival, Carl de Wet, Salim Memon, Rachael Raleigh, Mark A Morgan, Noela Baglot, Brigid M Gillespie
{"title":"Enhancing the quality of medicine handover at hospital discharge: a priority setting workshop.","authors":"H Laetitia Hattingh, Kate Johnston, Matt Percival, Carl de Wet, Salim Memon, Rachael Raleigh, Mark A Morgan, Noela Baglot, Brigid M Gillespie","doi":"10.1177/18333583241269025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When a patient is discharged from hospital it is essential that their general practitioner (GPs) and community pharmacist are informed of changes to their medicines. This necessitates effective communication and information-sharing between hospitals and primary care clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify priority medicine handover issues and solutions to inform the co-design and development of a multifaceted intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A modified nominal group technique was used to reach consensus on medicine handover priority areas. The first hour of an interactive 2-hr workshop focused on ranking pre-identified issues drawn from literature. In the second hour, participants identified solutions that they then ranked from highest to lowest priority through an online platform. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse workshop data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 32 participants attended the workshop including hospital doctors (<i>n</i> = 8, 25.0%), GPs and hospital pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 6 each, 18.8%), consumers and community pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 4 each, 12.5%), and both hospital and aged care facility nurses (<i>n</i> = 2 each 6.3%). From the list of 23 issues, the highest ranked issue was <i>high workload and time pressures impacting the discharge process</i> (22/32). From the list of 36 solutions, the participants identified two solutions that were equally ranked highest (12/27 each). They were <i>mandating that patients leave hospital with a discharge summary, including medication reconciliation information</i> and, <i>developing an integrated information technology system where medication summary and notes are accessible for primary, secondary and tertiary health provider</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consensus process highlighted challenges in hospital procedures where potential solutions may be implemented through co-design of a multifaceted intervention to improve medicine handover quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"18333583241269025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241269025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When a patient is discharged from hospital it is essential that their general practitioner (GPs) and community pharmacist are informed of changes to their medicines. This necessitates effective communication and information-sharing between hospitals and primary care clinicians.

Objective: To identify priority medicine handover issues and solutions to inform the co-design and development of a multifaceted intervention.

Method: A modified nominal group technique was used to reach consensus on medicine handover priority areas. The first hour of an interactive 2-hr workshop focused on ranking pre-identified issues drawn from literature. In the second hour, participants identified solutions that they then ranked from highest to lowest priority through an online platform. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse workshop data.

Results: In total 32 participants attended the workshop including hospital doctors (n = 8, 25.0%), GPs and hospital pharmacists (n = 6 each, 18.8%), consumers and community pharmacists (n = 4 each, 12.5%), and both hospital and aged care facility nurses (n = 2 each 6.3%). From the list of 23 issues, the highest ranked issue was high workload and time pressures impacting the discharge process (22/32). From the list of 36 solutions, the participants identified two solutions that were equally ranked highest (12/27 each). They were mandating that patients leave hospital with a discharge summary, including medication reconciliation information and, developing an integrated information technology system where medication summary and notes are accessible for primary, secondary and tertiary health provider.

Conclusion: The consensus process highlighted challenges in hospital procedures where potential solutions may be implemented through co-design of a multifaceted intervention to improve medicine handover quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高出院时药品交接质量:确定工作重点研讨会。
背景:当病人出院时,他们的全科医生(GPs)和社区药剂师必须了解他们的用药变化。这就需要医院和初级保健临床医生之间进行有效的沟通和信息共享:确定药品交接的重点问题和解决方案,为共同设计和开发多方面干预措施提供信息:方法:采用改良的名义小组技术,就药品交接优先领域达成共识。在为期 2 小时的互动研讨会中,第一小时的重点是对从文献中预先确定的问题进行排序。在第二个小时中,与会者确定了解决方案,然后通过在线平台从优先级最高到最低进行排序。研讨会数据采用描述性统计方法进行分析:共有 32 人参加了研讨会,其中包括医院医生(8 人,占 25.0%)、全科医生和医院药剂师(各 6 人,占 18.8%)、消费者和社区药剂师(各 4 人,占 12.5%)以及医院和养老机构护士(各 2 人,占 6.3%)。在 23 个问题中,排名最高的问题是影响出院程序的高工作量和时间压力(22/32)。在 36 个解决方案中,参与者发现了两个排名同样最高的解决方案(各占 12/27)。这两个解决方案分别是:规定患者出院时必须携带一份出院摘要,其中包括用药核对信息;开发一个综合信息技术系统,使一级、二级和三级医疗服务提供者都能查阅用药摘要和注意事项:结论:达成共识的过程凸显了医院程序中存在的挑战,可通过共同设计多方面的干预措施来实施潜在的解决方案,以提高药品交接质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health information management students' work-integrated learning (professional practice placements): Where do they go and what do they do? Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improves coding accuracy: A single-centre prospective study in China. Physicians' acceptance and adoption of mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. The health information management workforce: Looking to the future. Demystifying environmental health-related diseases: Using ICD codes to facilitate environmental health clinical referrals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1