Dataset for a randomised factorial experiment to optimise an information leaflet for women with breast cancer.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13547.1
Sophie M C Green, Samuel G Smith
{"title":"Dataset for a randomised factorial experiment to optimise an information leaflet for women with breast cancer.","authors":"Sophie M C Green, Samuel G Smith","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13547.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is low in women with breast cancer, which increases the risk of recurrence and mortality. A consistently reported barrier to adherence is low perceived necessity of AET and high concerns. Existing interventions to support medication beliefs have mixed effectiveness and rarely target medication beliefs specifically. We developed an information leaflet with five candidate components aiming to increase necessity beliefs about AET and reduce concerns; (1) diagrams explaining how AET works; (2) icon arrays displaying the benefits of AET; (3) information about the prevalence of side-effects; (4) answers to common concerns and (5) quotes and pictures from breast cancer survivors. Guided by the multiphase optimisation strategy (MOST), we aimed to optimise the content of the information leaflet. We planned for the dataset to be open access to provide an exemplar for other investigators to use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The content of the leaflet was optimised in a fully powered online 2 <sup>5</sup> factorial experiment. Each candidate component of the leaflet was operationalised as a factor with two levels; on vs off or enhanced vs basic. Healthy women (n=1604) completed the beliefs about medicines questionnaire and were randomised to view one of 32 versions of the information leaflet. The 32 versions comprised unique combinations of the factor levels corresponding to the five candidate intervention components. Time spent on the information leaflet page of the survey was recorded. After viewing the information leaflet, participants completed the beliefs about medicines questionnaire again, a true/false questionnaire assessing their objective knowledge of AET, a subjective rating of their knowledge of AET, and a questionnaire evaluating their satisfaction with the information they received.</p><p><strong>Importance of this dataset: </strong>The factorial dataset provides the opportunity for other investigators interested in using the MOST framework to learn about complex factorial designs, using a real dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13547.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is low in women with breast cancer, which increases the risk of recurrence and mortality. A consistently reported barrier to adherence is low perceived necessity of AET and high concerns. Existing interventions to support medication beliefs have mixed effectiveness and rarely target medication beliefs specifically. We developed an information leaflet with five candidate components aiming to increase necessity beliefs about AET and reduce concerns; (1) diagrams explaining how AET works; (2) icon arrays displaying the benefits of AET; (3) information about the prevalence of side-effects; (4) answers to common concerns and (5) quotes and pictures from breast cancer survivors. Guided by the multiphase optimisation strategy (MOST), we aimed to optimise the content of the information leaflet. We planned for the dataset to be open access to provide an exemplar for other investigators to use.

Methods: The content of the leaflet was optimised in a fully powered online 2 5 factorial experiment. Each candidate component of the leaflet was operationalised as a factor with two levels; on vs off or enhanced vs basic. Healthy women (n=1604) completed the beliefs about medicines questionnaire and were randomised to view one of 32 versions of the information leaflet. The 32 versions comprised unique combinations of the factor levels corresponding to the five candidate intervention components. Time spent on the information leaflet page of the survey was recorded. After viewing the information leaflet, participants completed the beliefs about medicines questionnaire again, a true/false questionnaire assessing their objective knowledge of AET, a subjective rating of their knowledge of AET, and a questionnaire evaluating their satisfaction with the information they received.

Importance of this dataset: The factorial dataset provides the opportunity for other investigators interested in using the MOST framework to learn about complex factorial designs, using a real dataset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为优化乳腺癌妇女信息传单而进行的随机因子实验的数据集。
背景:患乳腺癌的妇女很少坚持辅助内分泌治疗(AET),这增加了复发和死亡的风险。一直以来,人们认为 AET 的必要性低、顾虑多是影响坚持治疗的一个障碍。现有的支持药物治疗信念的干预措施效果参差不齐,很少有专门针对药物治疗信念的干预措施。我们制作了一份信息传单,其中包含五个候选部分,旨在提高人们对 AET 的必要性信念并减少顾虑;(1) 解释 AET 工作原理的图表;(2) 显示 AET 好处的图标阵列;(3) 有关副作用发生率的信息;(4) 常见顾虑的解答;(5) 乳腺癌幸存者的引语和图片。在多阶段优化策略(MOST)的指导下,我们旨在优化信息传单的内容。我们计划开放该数据集,为其他调查人员提供范例:方法:我们在一个充分授权的在线 2 5 因式实验中对宣传单的内容进行了优化。宣传单上的每个候选内容都作为一个因子进行操作,该因子有两个水平:开启与关闭或增强与基本。健康女性(n=1604)填写了药品信仰问卷,并被随机分配到 32 个版本的信息宣传单中查看。这 32 个版本包含与五个候选干预成分相对应的因子水平的独特组合。参与者在调查信息单页上花费的时间都会被记录下来。在阅读完信息单页后,参与者再次填写了 "对药品的看法 "问卷、评估其对 AET 的客观认识的 "真/假 "问卷、对其 AET 知识的主观评价问卷,以及评估其对所获信息满意度的问卷:该因子数据集为其他有意使用 MOST 框架的研究人员提供了机会,使他们能够利用真实数据集了解复杂的因子设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review. Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection. Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol. Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study. The UK Breast Cancer in Pregnancy (UKBCiP) Study. Incidence, diagnosis, management and short-term outcomes of breast cancer first diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom: A population-based descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1