External validation of the IAIHG autoimmune hepatitis response criteria in a multicentric real-world cohort

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY JHEP Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101149
Lorenz Grossar , Sarah Raevens , Christophe Van Steenkiste , Isabelle Colle , Charlotte De Vloo , Hans Orlent , Jeoffrey Schouten , Marie Gallant , Annelien Van Driessche , Sander Lefere , Lindsey Devisscher , Anja Geerts , Hans Van Vlierberghe , Xavier Verhelst
{"title":"External validation of the IAIHG autoimmune hepatitis response criteria in a multicentric real-world cohort","authors":"Lorenz Grossar ,&nbsp;Sarah Raevens ,&nbsp;Christophe Van Steenkiste ,&nbsp;Isabelle Colle ,&nbsp;Charlotte De Vloo ,&nbsp;Hans Orlent ,&nbsp;Jeoffrey Schouten ,&nbsp;Marie Gallant ,&nbsp;Annelien Van Driessche ,&nbsp;Sander Lefere ,&nbsp;Lindsey Devisscher ,&nbsp;Anja Geerts ,&nbsp;Hans Van Vlierberghe ,&nbsp;Xavier Verhelst","doi":"10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p>The goal of treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is induction of remission to prevent the development of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and its related complications. Various definitions of treatment response and remission have been used. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) recently defined consensus criteria for treatment response. We aimed to validate the IAIHG response criteria in our cohort and establish correlations with survival endpoints.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective, multicentric cohort study in one tertiary and seven secondary care centres in Belgium. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age at data collection and were diagnosed with AIH by a simplified IAIHG score of ≥6. Complete biochemical response (CBR) was defined according to the IAIHG consensus criteria as normalisation of transaminases and serum IgG within the first 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was liver-related survival – defined as freedom from liver-related death or liver transplantation. Secondary endpoints were overall mortality and transplant-free survival. Outcomes were compared between patients attaining CBR and those with insufficient response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Biochemical response status could be determined in 200 patients with AIH: CBR was achieved in 128 (64.0%) individuals. Patients not achieving CBR more frequently presented with cirrhosis on initial histology (22.2% <em>vs</em>. 10.9%, <em>p =</em> 0.036). Liver-related mortality or liver transplantation as a primary outcome occurred in 26 patients (13.0%). Patients achieving CBR exhibited superior liver-related (hazard ratio 0.118; 95% CI 0.052-0.267; <em>p</em> &lt;0.0001) and overall (hazard ratio 0.253; 95% CI 0.111-0.572; <em>p =</em> 0.0003) survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We externally validated the IAIHG consensus criteria for CBR and confirmed their correlation with survival endpoints in a multicentric, real-world cohort. Patients with AIH achieving CBR as an intermediate endpoint have significantly superior liver-related and overall survival.</p></div><div><h3>Impacts and Implications</h3><p>Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of treatment to induce remission of disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and the majority of patients require long-term corticosteroid treatment to achieve sustained remission. Definitions of response to treatment have varied over the years, and consistently used intermediate endpoints are needed to facilitate advancements in non-corticosteroid treatment for autoimmune hepatitis. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) defined consensus criteria on endpoints in the treatment of AIH, for which further external validation is needed. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of the IAIHG consensus criteria and corroborate their correlation to primary endpoints, such as liver-related survival and native liver survival in a multicentric, real-world setting. The design of future studies can rely on the IAIHG consensus criteria as intermediate endpoints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14764,"journal":{"name":"JHEP Reports","volume":"6 9","pages":"Article 101149"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924001538/pdfft?md5=7e446dec945586570832f08c91c1bb4b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589555924001538-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHEP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924001538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

The goal of treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is induction of remission to prevent the development of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and its related complications. Various definitions of treatment response and remission have been used. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) recently defined consensus criteria for treatment response. We aimed to validate the IAIHG response criteria in our cohort and establish correlations with survival endpoints.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, multicentric cohort study in one tertiary and seven secondary care centres in Belgium. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age at data collection and were diagnosed with AIH by a simplified IAIHG score of ≥6. Complete biochemical response (CBR) was defined according to the IAIHG consensus criteria as normalisation of transaminases and serum IgG within the first 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was liver-related survival – defined as freedom from liver-related death or liver transplantation. Secondary endpoints were overall mortality and transplant-free survival. Outcomes were compared between patients attaining CBR and those with insufficient response.

Results

Biochemical response status could be determined in 200 patients with AIH: CBR was achieved in 128 (64.0%) individuals. Patients not achieving CBR more frequently presented with cirrhosis on initial histology (22.2% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.036). Liver-related mortality or liver transplantation as a primary outcome occurred in 26 patients (13.0%). Patients achieving CBR exhibited superior liver-related (hazard ratio 0.118; 95% CI 0.052-0.267; p <0.0001) and overall (hazard ratio 0.253; 95% CI 0.111-0.572; p = 0.0003) survival.

Conclusions

We externally validated the IAIHG consensus criteria for CBR and confirmed their correlation with survival endpoints in a multicentric, real-world cohort. Patients with AIH achieving CBR as an intermediate endpoint have significantly superior liver-related and overall survival.

Impacts and Implications

Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of treatment to induce remission of disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and the majority of patients require long-term corticosteroid treatment to achieve sustained remission. Definitions of response to treatment have varied over the years, and consistently used intermediate endpoints are needed to facilitate advancements in non-corticosteroid treatment for autoimmune hepatitis. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) defined consensus criteria on endpoints in the treatment of AIH, for which further external validation is needed. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of the IAIHG consensus criteria and corroborate their correlation to primary endpoints, such as liver-related survival and native liver survival in a multicentric, real-world setting. The design of future studies can rely on the IAIHG consensus criteria as intermediate endpoints.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多中心真实世界队列中对 IAIHG 自身免疫性肝炎反应标准进行外部验证
背景& 目的自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)的治疗目标是诱导缓解,以防止肝纤维化、肝硬化及其相关并发症的发生。治疗反应和缓解的定义多种多样。国际自身免疫性肝炎组织(IAIHG)最近定义了治疗反应的共识标准。我们的目标是在我们的队列中验证 IAIHG 反应标准,并建立与生存终点的相关性。方法我们在比利时的一个三级医疗中心和七个二级医疗中心进行了一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。符合条件的患者在收集数据时至少年满18岁,并通过IAIHG简化评分≥6分确诊为AIH。根据IAIHG共识标准,完全生化应答(CBR)是指在治疗的前6个月内转氨酶和血清IgG恢复正常。主要终点是肝脏相关存活率--定义为无肝脏相关死亡或肝脏移植。次要终点是总死亡率和无移植生存率。对获得 CBR 的患者和反应不充分的患者的结果进行了比较:128人(64.0%)达到生化反应状态。未达到 CBR 的患者在初始组织学检查中更常见肝硬化(22.2% 对 10.9%,P = 0.036)。有 26 名患者(13.0%)出现了肝脏相关死亡率或肝移植这一主要结果。结论我们从外部验证了IAIHG共识的CBR标准,并在多中心、真实世界队列中证实了其与生存终点的相关性。影响和意义皮质类固醇仍是诱导自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)疾病活动缓解的治疗基石,大多数患者需要长期接受皮质类固醇治疗才能获得持续缓解。多年来,对治疗反应的定义各不相同,因此需要统一使用中间终点,以促进自身免疫性肝炎非皮质类固醇治疗的发展。国际自身免疫性肝炎组织(IAIHG)定义了治疗自身免疫性肝炎终点的共识标准,但还需要进一步的外部验证。在此,我们证明了 IAIHG 共识标准的实用性,并证实了其与主要终点的相关性,如在多中心、真实世界环境中的肝脏相关存活率和原肝存活率。未来研究的设计可将 IAIHG 共识标准作为中间终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JHEP Reports
JHEP Reports GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
161
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: JHEP Reports is an open access journal that is affiliated with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It serves as a companion journal to the highly respected Journal of Hepatology. The primary objective of JHEP Reports is to publish original papers and reviews that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of liver diseases. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including basic, translational, and clinical research. It also focuses on global issues in hepatology, with particular emphasis on areas such as clinical trials, novel diagnostics, precision medicine and therapeutics, cancer research, cellular and molecular studies, artificial intelligence, microbiome research, epidemiology, and cutting-edge technologies. In summary, JHEP Reports is dedicated to promoting scientific discoveries and innovations in liver diseases through the publication of high-quality research papers and reviews covering various aspects of hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board page Copyright and information Mechanisms and implications of recompensation in cirrhosis Hepatocellular carcinoma risk scores for non-viral liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1