Perspectives of educators and students on the efficacy of online teaching and learning strategies employed during COVID-19 in a health sciences institution.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03773-8
Keith Geraghty, Nicole Heng, Juliette Duff, Jacinta Burke, A D K Hill, John Jenkins, Gozie Offiah
{"title":"Perspectives of educators and students on the efficacy of online teaching and learning strategies employed during COVID-19 in a health sciences institution.","authors":"Keith Geraghty, Nicole Heng, Juliette Duff, Jacinta Burke, A D K Hill, John Jenkins, Gozie Offiah","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03773-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare education encountered unprecedented challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the necessary responses have also provided learning opportunities for the future.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on teaching and learning strategies and the perceptions of clinical educators and health sciences students on novel methods to improve online student engagement in Ireland's largest medical school.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two separate online surveys designed to gain insights into the perceived efficacy of online teaching strategies were distributed to clinical educators and health sciences students (medical and pharmacy) over 7 months via email.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86.4% of educators responded that rapport was more difficult to build online, and 90.5% reported less engagement from students online. The most popular methods that improved student engagement included using polls, a chat box function for questions, small group discussions and having student cameras turned on. Amongst educators surveyed, 81.8% felt a training course focused on teaching strategies at the start of every academic year would be beneficial. From the students' perspective, no difference was noted between the medicine and the pharmacy students. Seventy-five percent reported using quizzes/polls, and 63% reported using game-based platforms as techniques to improve online learning. Sixty-two percent of students described it as a positive outcome of learning during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Any pandemic poses unique challenges to the delivery of healthcare education. These surveys report educators' and students' views on online teaching and learning strategies, highlighting novel mechanisms to improve student engagement and ultimately impact on graduate outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"3045-3051"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03773-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare education encountered unprecedented challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the necessary responses have also provided learning opportunities for the future.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on teaching and learning strategies and the perceptions of clinical educators and health sciences students on novel methods to improve online student engagement in Ireland's largest medical school.

Methods: Two separate online surveys designed to gain insights into the perceived efficacy of online teaching strategies were distributed to clinical educators and health sciences students (medical and pharmacy) over 7 months via email.

Results: A total of 86.4% of educators responded that rapport was more difficult to build online, and 90.5% reported less engagement from students online. The most popular methods that improved student engagement included using polls, a chat box function for questions, small group discussions and having student cameras turned on. Amongst educators surveyed, 81.8% felt a training course focused on teaching strategies at the start of every academic year would be beneficial. From the students' perspective, no difference was noted between the medicine and the pharmacy students. Seventy-five percent reported using quizzes/polls, and 63% reported using game-based platforms as techniques to improve online learning. Sixty-two percent of students described it as a positive outcome of learning during the pandemic.

Conclusion: Any pandemic poses unique challenges to the delivery of healthcare education. These surveys report educators' and students' views on online teaching and learning strategies, highlighting novel mechanisms to improve student engagement and ultimately impact on graduate outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育工作者和学生对某卫生科学机构在 COVID-19 期间采用的在线教学和学习策略的有效性的看法。
背景:目的:我们旨在评估 COVID-19 对爱尔兰最大医学院的教学和学习策略的影响,以及临床教育工作者和健康科学专业学生对提高学生在线参与度的新方法的看法:方法: 通过电子邮件向临床教育工作者和健康科学专业学生(医学和药学)分发了两份独立的在线调查问卷,旨在了解他们对在线教学策略有效性的看法,调查历时 7 个月:共有 86.4% 的教育工作者回答说,在网上更难建立融洽的关系,90.5% 的教育工作者表示学生在网上的参与度较低。最受欢迎的提高学生参与度的方法包括使用投票、聊天框提问功能、小组讨论和打开学生摄像头。在接受调查的教育工作者中,81.8% 的人认为,在每学年开始时开设以教学策略为重点的培训课程会有所裨益。从学生的角度来看,医学专业学生和药学专业学生之间并无差异。75%的学生表示使用测验/民意调查,63%的学生表示使用游戏平台作为改进在线学习的技术。62%的学生认为这是在大流行期间学习的积极成果:任何大流行都会给医疗保健教育的开展带来独特的挑战。这些调查报告了教育工作者和学生对在线教学和学习策略的看法,强调了提高学生参与度的新机制,并最终对毕业生的成果产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
期刊最新文献
Serum FoxO1 and SIRT2 concentrations in healthy pregnant women and complicated by preeclampsia. The role of clinical pharmacist in the management of resistant hypertension. Ultrasound-guided vs. laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gender disparities in extreme psychological distress at cancer diagnosis and patients access to psycho-oncological care. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical and pathologic stages of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1