Impact of Prior Cervical Fusion on Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Deformity Correction.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005119
Manjot Singh, Mariah Balmaceno-Criss, Mohammad Daher, Renaud Lafage, Robert K Eastlack, Munish C Gupta, Gregory M Mundis, Jeffrey L Gum, Kojo D Hamilton, Richard Hostin, Peter G Passias, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Khaled M Kebaish, Lawrence G Lenke, Christopher P Ames, Douglas C Burton, Stephen M Lewis, Eric O Klineberg, Han Jo Kim, Frank J Schwab, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin S Smith, Breton G Line, Shay Bess, Virginie Lafage, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels
{"title":"Impact of Prior Cervical Fusion on Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Deformity Correction.","authors":"Manjot Singh, Mariah Balmaceno-Criss, Mohammad Daher, Renaud Lafage, Robert K Eastlack, Munish C Gupta, Gregory M Mundis, Jeffrey L Gum, Kojo D Hamilton, Richard Hostin, Peter G Passias, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Khaled M Kebaish, Lawrence G Lenke, Christopher P Ames, Douglas C Burton, Stephen M Lewis, Eric O Klineberg, Han Jo Kim, Frank J Schwab, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin S Smith, Breton G Line, Shay Bess, Virginie Lafage, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the impact of prior cervical constructs on upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) selection and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing thoracolumbar deformity correction.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical planning for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients involves consideration of spinal alignment and existing fusion constructs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASD patients with (ANTERIOR or POSTERIOR) and without (NONE) prior cervical fusion who underwent thoracolumbar fusion were included. Demographics, radiographic alignment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and complications were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on POSTERIOR patients to identify parameters predictive of UIV choice and to evaluate postoperative outcomes impacted by UIV selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 542 patients, with 446 NONE, 72 ANTERIOR, and 24 POSTERIOR patients, mean age was 64.4 years and 432 (80%) were female. Cervical fusion patients had worse preoperative cervical and lumbosacral deformity, and PROMs ( P <0.05). In the POSTERIOR cohort, preoperative LIV was frequently below the cervicothoracic junction (54%) and uncommonly (13%) connected to the thoracolumbar UIV. Multivariate analyses revealed that higher preoperative cervical SVA (coeff=-0.22, 95% CI=-0.43 to -0.01, P =0.038) and C2SPi (coeff=-0.72, 95% CI=-1.36 to -0.07, P =0.031), and lower preoperative thoracic kyphosis (coeff=0.14, 95% CI=0.01-0.28, P =0.040) and thoracolumbar lordosis (coeff=0.22, 95% CI=0.10-0.33, P =0.001) were predictive of cranial UIV. Two-year postoperatively, cervical patients continued to have worse cervical deformity and PROMs ( P <0.05) but had comparable postoperative complications. Choice of thoracolumbar UIV below or above T6, as well as the number of unfused levels between constructs, did not affect patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients who underwent thoracolumbar deformity correction, prior cervical fusion was associated with more severe spinopelvic deformity and PROMs preoperatively. The choice of thoracolumbar UIV was strongly predicted by their baseline cervical and thoracolumbar alignment. Despite their poor preoperative condition, these patients still experienced significant improvements in their thoracolumbar alignment and PROMs after surgery, irrespective of UIV selection.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Objective: Evaluate the impact of prior cervical constructs on upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) selection and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing thoracolumbar deformity correction.

Background: Surgical planning for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients involves consideration of spinal alignment and existing fusion constructs.

Methods: ASD patients with (ANTERIOR or POSTERIOR) and without (NONE) prior cervical fusion who underwent thoracolumbar fusion were included. Demographics, radiographic alignment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and complications were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on POSTERIOR patients to identify parameters predictive of UIV choice and to evaluate postoperative outcomes impacted by UIV selection.

Results: Among 542 patients, with 446 NONE, 72 ANTERIOR, and 24 POSTERIOR patients, mean age was 64.4 years and 432 (80%) were female. Cervical fusion patients had worse preoperative cervical and lumbosacral deformity, and PROMs ( P <0.05). In the POSTERIOR cohort, preoperative LIV was frequently below the cervicothoracic junction (54%) and uncommonly (13%) connected to the thoracolumbar UIV. Multivariate analyses revealed that higher preoperative cervical SVA (coeff=-0.22, 95% CI=-0.43 to -0.01, P =0.038) and C2SPi (coeff=-0.72, 95% CI=-1.36 to -0.07, P =0.031), and lower preoperative thoracic kyphosis (coeff=0.14, 95% CI=0.01-0.28, P =0.040) and thoracolumbar lordosis (coeff=0.22, 95% CI=0.10-0.33, P =0.001) were predictive of cranial UIV. Two-year postoperatively, cervical patients continued to have worse cervical deformity and PROMs ( P <0.05) but had comparable postoperative complications. Choice of thoracolumbar UIV below or above T6, as well as the number of unfused levels between constructs, did not affect patient outcomes.

Conclusions: Among patients who underwent thoracolumbar deformity correction, prior cervical fusion was associated with more severe spinopelvic deformity and PROMs preoperatively. The choice of thoracolumbar UIV was strongly predicted by their baseline cervical and thoracolumbar alignment. Despite their poor preoperative condition, these patients still experienced significant improvements in their thoracolumbar alignment and PROMs after surgery, irrespective of UIV selection.

Level of evidence: IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎融合术对胸腰椎畸形矫正患者的影响
研究设计对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析:评估先前的颈椎结构对胸腰椎畸形矫正患者上部器械椎体(UIV)选择和术后效果的影响:背景:成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者的手术计划需要考虑脊柱排列和现有的融合结构:方法:纳入曾接受过颈椎融合术的(前位或后位)和未接受过颈椎融合术的(无)ASD 患者。比较了人口统计学、放射学对位、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和并发症。对POSTERIOR患者进行了单变量和多变量分析,以确定预测UIV选择的参数,并评估UIV选择对术后结果的影响:在542名患者中,有446名无UIV患者、72名ANTERIOR患者和24名POSTERIOR患者,平均年龄为64.4岁,432人(80%)为女性。颈椎融合术患者术前的颈椎和腰骶部畸形以及PROMs(PConclusions:在接受胸腰椎畸形矫正术的患者中,之前接受过颈椎融合术的患者术前的脊柱骨盆畸形和PROM更严重。患者的颈椎和胸腰椎基线对齐情况强烈预示着他们对胸腰椎UIV的选择。尽管这些患者术前状况不佳,但无论选择哪种UIV,术后他们的胸腰椎对线和PROM仍有显著改善:证据级别:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Intraoperative Hypotension Is an Important Modifiable Risk Factor for Major Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients With Long-term Follow-up. Does Paraspinal Muscle Mass Predict Lumbar Lordosis Before and After Decompression for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis? The Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Assessing the Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Spinal Fusion Surgery for Pediatric Patients With Scoliosis and Cerebral Palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1