Implementation and Evaluation of a Gait Training Assistant for the Use of Crutches: Usability Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.2196/51898
Milan Anton Wolf, Leon Sauerwald, Felix Kosmalla, Florian Daiber, Antonio Krüger, Stefan Landgraeber
{"title":"Implementation and Evaluation of a Gait Training Assistant for the Use of Crutches: Usability Study.","authors":"Milan Anton Wolf, Leon Sauerwald, Felix Kosmalla, Florian Daiber, Antonio Krüger, Stefan Landgraeber","doi":"10.2196/51898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical procedures on the lower extremities often require weight-bearing on crutches as part of the rehabilitation process. Orthopedic elective procedures enable patients to learn the correct use of crutches in a controlled preoperative setting. Digital assistance systems can safely circumvent a shortage of skilled staff and any contact restrictions that may be necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The usability of a newly developed gait training assistant (GTA) for the use of crutches will be evaluated. An intervention group trained to use crutches by the digital trainer will be compared with a control group trained to use crutches conventionally by a physiotherapist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the development and implementation of a novel GTA, 14 patients learned to walk with crutches by completing specific exercises while receiving live feedback. Their movements were detected by a depth sensor and evaluated in real time. Specific parameters (step length, synchronous movement, crutch angle, and crutch distance to the feet) were compared with a control group (n=14) trained to use crutches by physiotherapists. The intervention group was also assessed by a physiotherapist. At the end of the study, the patients completed questionnaires to evaluate the usability of the system (Brooke's System Usability Scale score) and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients trained by the novel GTA were able to use crutches correctly. The intervention group showed significantly better values for crutch angle (mean -6.3°, SD 3.5° vs mean -12.4°, SD 4.5°; P<.001) and crutch position (mean 3.3, SD 5.1 cm vs mean -8.5, SD 4.9 cm; P=.02). Both groups reported that they felt confident in the use of crutches, were able to follow the instructions, and enjoyed the training. Even though the majority (12/14, 86%) preferred physical therapy over a purely digital approach, most participants enjoyed using the system (13/14, 93%) and were interested in trying out other digital assistants (11/14, 79%). The usability of the GTA was rated above average by the majority (9/14, 64%) of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The newly designed GTA is a safe method of teaching the use of crutches and is statistically superior to training by a physiotherapist. Even if patients prefer interaction with a physiotherapist over a purely digital approach, digital devices provide a safe and motivating opportunity to learn the essential locomotor skills for rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e51898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical procedures on the lower extremities often require weight-bearing on crutches as part of the rehabilitation process. Orthopedic elective procedures enable patients to learn the correct use of crutches in a controlled preoperative setting. Digital assistance systems can safely circumvent a shortage of skilled staff and any contact restrictions that may be necessary.

Objective: The usability of a newly developed gait training assistant (GTA) for the use of crutches will be evaluated. An intervention group trained to use crutches by the digital trainer will be compared with a control group trained to use crutches conventionally by a physiotherapist.

Methods: As part of the development and implementation of a novel GTA, 14 patients learned to walk with crutches by completing specific exercises while receiving live feedback. Their movements were detected by a depth sensor and evaluated in real time. Specific parameters (step length, synchronous movement, crutch angle, and crutch distance to the feet) were compared with a control group (n=14) trained to use crutches by physiotherapists. The intervention group was also assessed by a physiotherapist. At the end of the study, the patients completed questionnaires to evaluate the usability of the system (Brooke's System Usability Scale score) and patient satisfaction.

Results: All patients trained by the novel GTA were able to use crutches correctly. The intervention group showed significantly better values for crutch angle (mean -6.3°, SD 3.5° vs mean -12.4°, SD 4.5°; P<.001) and crutch position (mean 3.3, SD 5.1 cm vs mean -8.5, SD 4.9 cm; P=.02). Both groups reported that they felt confident in the use of crutches, were able to follow the instructions, and enjoyed the training. Even though the majority (12/14, 86%) preferred physical therapy over a purely digital approach, most participants enjoyed using the system (13/14, 93%) and were interested in trying out other digital assistants (11/14, 79%). The usability of the GTA was rated above average by the majority (9/14, 64%) of the patients.

Conclusions: The newly designed GTA is a safe method of teaching the use of crutches and is statistically superior to training by a physiotherapist. Even if patients prefer interaction with a physiotherapist over a purely digital approach, digital devices provide a safe and motivating opportunity to learn the essential locomotor skills for rehabilitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用拐杖的步态训练助手的实施与评估:可用性研究。
背景:下肢手术通常需要在康复过程中使用拐杖负重。骨科择期手术可以让患者在术前可控的环境中学习正确使用拐杖。数字辅助系统可以安全地避开熟练工作人员的短缺和可能必要的接触限制:将对新开发的步态训练助手(GTA)在使用拐杖方面的可用性进行评估。通过数字训练器训练使用拐杖的干预组将与通过理疗师传统训练使用拐杖的对照组进行比较:方法:作为开发和实施新型 GTA 的一部分,14 名患者通过完成特定练习,同时接受实时反馈,学会了使用拐杖行走。他们的动作由深度传感器检测并实时评估。具体参数(步长、同步运动、拐杖角度和拐杖到脚的距离)与理疗师训练使用拐杖的对照组(14 人)进行了比较。物理治疗师也对干预组进行了评估。研究结束时,患者填写了调查问卷,以评估系统的可用性(布鲁克系统可用性量表评分)和患者满意度:结果:所有接受过新型 GTA 培训的患者都能正确使用拐杖。干预组的拐杖角度值明显更好(平均-6.3°,SD 3.5° vs 平均-12.4°,SD 4.5°;PC结论:新设计的 GTA 是一种安全的拐杖使用教学方法,在统计学上优于物理治疗师的培训。即使患者更喜欢与理疗师互动而不是纯粹的数字方法,数字设备也能提供一个安全、有动力的学习康复所需的基本运动技能的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Promise of AI for Image-Driven Medicine: Qualitative Interview Study of Radiologists' and Pathologists' Perspectives. Mobile App for Improving the Mental Health of Youth in Out-of-Home Care: Development Study Using an Intervention Mapping Approach. German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study. Exploring Patient, Proxy, and Clinician Perspectives on the Value and Impact of an Inpatient Portal: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Reducing the Number of Intrusive Memories of Work-Related Traumatic Events in Frontline Health Care Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1