Measuring Social Frailty: A Scoping Review of Available Scales and Tools.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae114
Jed Montayre, Kay Kuo, Ka Man Carman Leung, Ivy Zhao
{"title":"Measuring Social Frailty: A Scoping Review of Available Scales and Tools.","authors":"Jed Montayre, Kay Kuo, Ka Man Carman Leung, Ivy Zhao","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Social frailty is an emerging concept characterized by state of vulnerability due to the lack or absence of social resources that enable health and well-being, particularly among older people. However, there is no consensus on how to accurately measure and assess social frailty, given the broad coverage of social dimensions affecting older individuals. This scoping review aimed to identify the existing tools and scales used to measure social frailty in older people.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A scoping review methodology was employed. Articles published between January 2014 and April 2024 were searched in 6 electronic databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Scopus, SocIndex, and CINAHL. The scoping review followed a 5-stage process by Arksey and O'Malley and adhered to the guidelines provided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine social frailty tools were identified across the 58 papers included in this review. The individual question item commonly used in the scales were classified into main categories based on their conceptual characteristics and intentions. The most common individual questionnaire constructs used to measure social frailty included financial status, social resources, social behaviors and activities, and sense of purpose. The reviewed tools varied in terms of their robustness and the process of scale development.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Our review suggested the development of a standardized, psychometrically tested, and accurate screening tool to screen social frailty status. An accurate social frailty assessment can inform the development of useful interventions, which also has implications in preventing the development of physical frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Social frailty is an emerging concept characterized by state of vulnerability due to the lack or absence of social resources that enable health and well-being, particularly among older people. However, there is no consensus on how to accurately measure and assess social frailty, given the broad coverage of social dimensions affecting older individuals. This scoping review aimed to identify the existing tools and scales used to measure social frailty in older people.

Research design and methods: A scoping review methodology was employed. Articles published between January 2014 and April 2024 were searched in 6 electronic databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Scopus, SocIndex, and CINAHL. The scoping review followed a 5-stage process by Arksey and O'Malley and adhered to the guidelines provided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews.

Results: Nine social frailty tools were identified across the 58 papers included in this review. The individual question item commonly used in the scales were classified into main categories based on their conceptual characteristics and intentions. The most common individual questionnaire constructs used to measure social frailty included financial status, social resources, social behaviors and activities, and sense of purpose. The reviewed tools varied in terms of their robustness and the process of scale development.

Discussion and implications: Our review suggested the development of a standardized, psychometrically tested, and accurate screening tool to screen social frailty status. An accurate social frailty assessment can inform the development of useful interventions, which also has implications in preventing the development of physical frailty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量社会脆弱性:对现有量表和工具的范围审查。
背景和目的:社会虚弱是一个新出现的概念,其特点是由于缺乏或缺少能促进健康和福祉的社会资源而导致的脆弱状态,尤其是在老年人当中。然而,鉴于影响老年人的社会因素涉及面很广,如何准确测量和评估社会脆弱性还没有达成共识。本次范围界定综述旨在确定用于衡量老年人社会脆弱性的现有工具和量表:采用了范围界定审查方法。在六个电子数据库中检索了 2014 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月间发表的文章:PubMed、PsycINFO、ProQuest、Scopus、SocIndex 和 CINAHL。范围界定审查遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的五阶段流程,并遵守 PRISMA-ScR 提供的指南:本综述共收录了 58 篇论文,其中发现了九种社会虚弱工具。量表中常用的单个问题项目根据其概念特征和意图被分为几大类。最常用于测量社会脆弱性的单个问卷结构包括财务状况、社会资源、社会行为和活动以及目的感。所审查的工具在其稳健性和量表开发过程方面各不相同:我们的综述建议开发一种标准化的、经过心理测试的、准确的筛查工具来筛查社会虚弱状况。准确的社会虚弱评估可为制定有用的干预措施提供依据,这对预防身体虚弱的发展也有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and healthcare utilization among aging veterans in supported housing: A comparison with independently housed age-matched veterans. Communications needs of family caregivers of geriatric unit residents at end-of-life. Taking Action to Support Nursing Home Resident Wellbeing: Perspectives of U.S. Nursing Home Staff During COVID-19. Supporting older people experiencing homelessness and memory problems in hostels: Learning from an ethnographic study. Focusing on Caregiver Neglect: A Novel Strategy for Mistreatment of Older Adults Screening and Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1