Organizational and Individual Contributing Factors to Safety Climate in Healthcare Industries-Bayesian Network Predictive Modeling Approach.

Yimin He, Jin Lee, Yueng-Hsiang Huang, Changya Hu
{"title":"Organizational and Individual Contributing Factors to Safety Climate in Healthcare Industries-Bayesian Network Predictive Modeling Approach.","authors":"Yimin He, Jin Lee, Yueng-Hsiang Huang, Changya Hu","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current study aims to identify individual and joint drivers that significantly influence the safety climate in healthcare industries by using Bayesian network (BN) simulations for an in-depth analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey data were collected from 452 employees from two branches of one hospital in China for a study about workplace safety. The original English surveys were translated into Chinese using the back-translation procedure recommended by Brislin. Employees were asked to complete two online surveys with 1 month in between each administration. The sample was 42% doctors and 58% nurses. A BN model, based on theory, was updated and complemented with expert knowledge. A graphical model based on expert knowledge and data-driven machine learning approaches was used to refine the BN structure, representing interrelationships among all studied variables. The BN model was employed to identify the best key drivers and joint strategies for safety climate improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BN model demonstrated a good overall fit. The Euclidean distance metric was used to assess the influence between connected variables, with interpersonal trust and locus of control having the strongest independent effects on safety climate among the five contributing factors. Joint strategies, particularly joint optimization of error disclosure culture and interpersonal trust, as well as error disclosure culture and self-efficacy, were most effective in promoting a safe climate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that hospital safety climate can be improved by providing a psychologically safe error disclosure culture and enhancing interpersonal trust among employees and their self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"908-918"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The current study aims to identify individual and joint drivers that significantly influence the safety climate in healthcare industries by using Bayesian network (BN) simulations for an in-depth analysis.

Methods: Survey data were collected from 452 employees from two branches of one hospital in China for a study about workplace safety. The original English surveys were translated into Chinese using the back-translation procedure recommended by Brislin. Employees were asked to complete two online surveys with 1 month in between each administration. The sample was 42% doctors and 58% nurses. A BN model, based on theory, was updated and complemented with expert knowledge. A graphical model based on expert knowledge and data-driven machine learning approaches was used to refine the BN structure, representing interrelationships among all studied variables. The BN model was employed to identify the best key drivers and joint strategies for safety climate improvement.

Results: The BN model demonstrated a good overall fit. The Euclidean distance metric was used to assess the influence between connected variables, with interpersonal trust and locus of control having the strongest independent effects on safety climate among the five contributing factors. Joint strategies, particularly joint optimization of error disclosure culture and interpersonal trust, as well as error disclosure culture and self-efficacy, were most effective in promoting a safe climate.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that hospital safety climate can be improved by providing a psychologically safe error disclosure culture and enhancing interpersonal trust among employees and their self-efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗行业安全氛围的组织和个人促成因素--贝叶斯网络预测建模方法。
目的:本研究旨在通过贝叶斯网络模拟深入分析,找出对医疗行业安全氛围有重大影响的个体和联合驱动因素:本研究旨在通过贝叶斯网络模拟进行深入分析,找出对医疗行业安全氛围有重大影响的个体和联合驱动因素:方法:本研究收集了中国某医院两家分院 452 名员工的工作场所安全调查数据。采用布里斯林推荐的反向翻译程序,将原始英文调查问卷翻译成中文。员工被要求完成两次在线调查,每次间隔一个月。样本中有 42% 的医生和 58% 的护士。对基于理论的贝叶斯网络(BN)模型进行了更新,并补充了专家知识。一个基于专家知识和数据驱动的机器学习方法的图形模型被用来完善贝叶斯网络结构,表示所有研究变量之间的相互关系。贝叶斯网络模型用于确定改善安全氛围的最佳关键驱动因素和联合战略:结果:贝叶斯网络模型显示出良好的整体拟合效果。使用欧氏距离度量来评估相关变量之间的影响,在五个促成因素中,人际信任和控制感对安全氛围的独立影响最大。联合策略,尤其是错误披露文化和人际信任的联合优化,以及错误披露文化和自我效能感的联合优化,对促进安全氛围最为有效:研究结果表明,通过提供心理安全的差错披露文化、增强员工之间的人际信任及其自我效能感,可以改善医院的安全氛围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Lifestyle Medicine into Occupational Medicine Practice - ACOEM Guidance Statement. A Study on Nonvibration-Exposed Organs Correlated Indices as Diagnostic Biomarkers of Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome. Beyond the Pandemic: Longitudinal Lessons on Social Support, Sleep Quality, and Burnout Among Healthcare Workers. Cardiorespiratory Fitness Associates Negatively With Arterial Stiffness in a Cohort of Industrial Workers Followed Up for 4 Years. A Qualitative Analysis of Workers Perceptions on the Role of Management in Promoting Health Behavior, Informed by the COM-B Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1