Expectancy-value-cost motivational profiles in biology and physics: Their relations with gender, self-reported satisfaction of needs, and learning behavior

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102520
Eve Kikas , Ita Puusepp , Kati Aus
{"title":"Expectancy-value-cost motivational profiles in biology and physics: Their relations with gender, self-reported satisfaction of needs, and learning behavior","authors":"Eve Kikas ,&nbsp;Ita Puusepp ,&nbsp;Kati Aus","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to 1) identify groups of students with different expectancy, intrinsic and utility value, and cost profiles in biology and physics, and 2) to examine group differences in sources of beliefs (gender, students' perceptions of their biology and physics teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior) and students' learning behavior (reported persistence and use of learning strategies). In total, 1502 eighth and ninth grade students from Estonia filled in questionnaires. With latent profile analysis, four general (<em>Indifferent, Maladaptive, Moderate</em>, and <em>Adaptive</em>) and two subject-specific (<em>Biology-Adaptive</em> and <em>Physics-Adaptive</em>) motivational profiles were identified. These groups differed in gender composition, students' perceptions of their teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior, task-persistent learning behavior, and reported use of deep learning strategies. The findings suggest that motivation may develop differently within each subject. Examining motivation across two or more subjects adds valuable information about individual differences and has practical implications for supporting motivation in various subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102520"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to 1) identify groups of students with different expectancy, intrinsic and utility value, and cost profiles in biology and physics, and 2) to examine group differences in sources of beliefs (gender, students' perceptions of their biology and physics teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior) and students' learning behavior (reported persistence and use of learning strategies). In total, 1502 eighth and ninth grade students from Estonia filled in questionnaires. With latent profile analysis, four general (Indifferent, Maladaptive, Moderate, and Adaptive) and two subject-specific (Biology-Adaptive and Physics-Adaptive) motivational profiles were identified. These groups differed in gender composition, students' perceptions of their teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior, task-persistent learning behavior, and reported use of deep learning strategies. The findings suggest that motivation may develop differently within each subject. Examining motivation across two or more subjects adds valuable information about individual differences and has practical implications for supporting motivation in various subjects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物学和物理学中的期望-价值-成本动机特征:它们与性别、自我报告的需求满足和学习行为的关系
本研究旨在:1)确定在生物和物理学习中具有不同期望值、内在价值、效用价值和成本特征的学生群体;2)研究各群体在信念来源(性别、学生对生物和物理教师的需求支持行为和需求阻碍行为的看法)和学生学习行为(报告的持续性和学习策略的使用)方面的差异。爱沙尼亚共有 1502 名八年级和九年级学生填写了调查问卷。通过潜特征分析,确定了四种一般动机特征(冷漠型、适应不良型、适度型和适应型)和两种特定学科动机特征(生物适应型和物理适应型)。这些组别在性别构成、学生对教师支持需求和抑制需求行为的看法、任务持续学习行为以及报告的深度学习策略的使用方面存在差异。研究结果表明,学习动机在各学科中的发展可能各不相同。对两个或更多科目的学习动机进行研究,可以增加有关个体差异的宝贵信息,并对支持各学科的学习动机具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension Students' study activities before and after exam deadlines as predictors of performance in STEM courses: A multi-source data analysis The relationship between positive and painful emotions and cognitive load during an algebra learning task Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1