Does Secondary Mechanical Manipulation of Lipoaspirate Enhance the Vasculogenic Potential of Fat Grafts? A Systematic Review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004048
Jared Ethan McSweeney, Li Yenn Yong, Naveen Virin Goddard, Jason K Wong
{"title":"Does Secondary Mechanical Manipulation of Lipoaspirate Enhance the Vasculogenic Potential of Fat Grafts? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jared Ethan McSweeney, Li Yenn Yong, Naveen Virin Goddard, Jason K Wong","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fat grafting is a highly versatile option in the reconstructive armamentarium but with unpredictable retention rates and outcomes. The primary outcome of this systematic review was to assess whether secondary mechanically processed lipoaspirate favorably enhances the vasculogenic potential of fat grafts when compared to unprocessed lipoaspirate or fat grafts prepared using centrifugation alone. The secondary outcome was to assess the evidence around graft retention and improved outcomes when comparing the aforementioned groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted up to February 2022. All human and animal research, which provided a cross-comparison between unprocessed, centrifuged, secondary mechanically fragmented (SMF) or secondary mechanically disrupted (SMD) fat grafts, was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one full texts were included. Vasculogenic potential was assessed by quantification of angiogenic growth factors and cellular composition. Cellular composition of mesenchymal stem cells, perivascular stem cells, and endothelial progenitor cells was quantified by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Fat graft volume retention rates and fat grafting to aid wound healing were assessed. Although the presence of industry-funded studies and inadequate reporting of methodological data in some studies were sources of bias, data showed SMF grafts contain an enriched pericyte population with increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion. Animal studies indicate that SMD grafts may increase rates of fat graft retention and wound closure compared to centrifuged grafts; however, clinical studies are yet to show similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review, we were able to conclude that the existing literature suggests mechanically processing fat, whether it be through fragmentation or disruption, improves vasculogenic potential by enhancing angiogenic growth factor and relevant vascular progenitor cell levels. Whilst in vivo animal studies are scarce, the review findings suggest that secondary mechanically processed fat enhances fat graft retention and can aid with wound healing. Further clinical studies are required to assess potential differences in human studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fat grafting is a highly versatile option in the reconstructive armamentarium but with unpredictable retention rates and outcomes. The primary outcome of this systematic review was to assess whether secondary mechanically processed lipoaspirate favorably enhances the vasculogenic potential of fat grafts when compared to unprocessed lipoaspirate or fat grafts prepared using centrifugation alone. The secondary outcome was to assess the evidence around graft retention and improved outcomes when comparing the aforementioned groups.

Methods: A search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted up to February 2022. All human and animal research, which provided a cross-comparison between unprocessed, centrifuged, secondary mechanically fragmented (SMF) or secondary mechanically disrupted (SMD) fat grafts, was included.

Results: Thirty-one full texts were included. Vasculogenic potential was assessed by quantification of angiogenic growth factors and cellular composition. Cellular composition of mesenchymal stem cells, perivascular stem cells, and endothelial progenitor cells was quantified by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Fat graft volume retention rates and fat grafting to aid wound healing were assessed. Although the presence of industry-funded studies and inadequate reporting of methodological data in some studies were sources of bias, data showed SMF grafts contain an enriched pericyte population with increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion. Animal studies indicate that SMD grafts may increase rates of fat graft retention and wound closure compared to centrifuged grafts; however, clinical studies are yet to show similar results.

Conclusions: In this systematic review, we were able to conclude that the existing literature suggests mechanically processing fat, whether it be through fragmentation or disruption, improves vasculogenic potential by enhancing angiogenic growth factor and relevant vascular progenitor cell levels. Whilst in vivo animal studies are scarce, the review findings suggest that secondary mechanically processed fat enhances fat graft retention and can aid with wound healing. Further clinical studies are required to assess potential differences in human studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂肪抽吸物的二次机械操作会增强脂肪移植物的血管生成潜力吗?系统综述。
背景:脂肪移植是整形手术中用途广泛的一种方法,但其保留率和效果却难以预测。本系统综述的主要结果是评估与未经处理的吸脂液或仅用离心法制备的脂肪移植物相比,二次机械处理的吸脂液是否能有效增强脂肪移植物的血管生成潜力。次要结果是评估与上述组别相比,移植物保留率和效果改善的相关证据:截至 2022 年 2 月,我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 上进行了搜索。结果:共收录了31篇全文:结果:共纳入 31 篇全文。通过量化血管生成生长因子和细胞组成来评估血管生成潜力。通过荧光激活细胞分选(FACS)分析量化间充质干细胞、血管周围干细胞和内皮祖细胞的细胞组成。评估了脂肪移植的体积保持率和脂肪移植对伤口愈合的帮助。虽然一些研究中存在行业资助研究和方法数据报告不充分的偏差,但数据显示 SMF 移植物含有丰富的周细胞群,血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)分泌增加。动物研究表明,与离心移植物相比,SMD移植物可提高脂肪移植物的保留率和伤口闭合率;但临床研究尚未显示类似结果:在这篇系统性综述中,我们得出的结论是,现有文献表明,无论是通过破碎还是破坏,对脂肪进行机械处理都能提高血管生成生长因子和相关血管祖细胞的水平,从而改善血管生成潜能。虽然体内动物研究很少,但综述结果表明,二次机械加工的脂肪能增强脂肪移植的保持力,并有助于伤口愈合。需要进一步开展临床研究,以评估人体研究中的潜在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced Diabetic Rat Wound Healing by Platelet-Rich Plasma Adhesion Zwitterionic Hydrogel. The Impact of Area Deprivation Index, Geography, and Mechanism on Incidence of Ballistic Injury to the Upper Extremity. Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Cancer Among US Military Health System Beneficiaries. Building the Next Generation of African Plastic Surgeons. Orthoplastic Management of Lower Limb Traumas: A Retrospective Study on Polytraumas Versus Isolated Injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1