Coping with Huntington's Disease in Patients and At-Risk Individuals.

IF 2.1 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Huntington's disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JHD-240027
Abigail L B Snow, Abagail E Ciriegio, Kelly H Watson, Mary G Baumann, Anna C Pfalzer, Spencer Diehl, Kathleen Duncan, Katherine E McDonell, Daniel O Claassen, Bruce E Compas
{"title":"Coping with Huntington's Disease in Patients and At-Risk Individuals.","authors":"Abigail L B Snow, Abagail E Ciriegio, Kelly H Watson, Mary G Baumann, Anna C Pfalzer, Spencer Diehl, Kathleen Duncan, Katherine E McDonell, Daniel O Claassen, Bruce E Compas","doi":"10.3233/JHD-240027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Huntington's disease (HD) presents patients and individuals at risk for HD with significant levels of stress. However, relatively little research has examined how individuals cope with stress related to the disease or the association of specific coping strategies with psychological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the ways in which HD patients and at-risk individuals cope with HD-related stress using a control-based model of coping and the association of coping strategies with symptoms of depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HD patients (n = 49) and at-risk individuals (n = 76) completed the Responses to Stress Questionnaire - Huntington's Disease Version to assess coping strategies in response to HD-related stress, as well as standardized measures of depression and anxiety symptoms. Patient health records were accessed to obtain information related to disease characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients and at-risk individuals reported using comparable levels of primary control coping, secondary control coping, and disengagement coping strategies. In linear regression analyses, only secondary control coping was significantly associated with lower depression (β= -0.62, p < 0.001) and anxiety (β= -0.59, p < 0.001) symptoms in patients and at-risk individuals (β= -0.55, p < 0.001 and β= -0.50, p < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Secondary control coping may be beneficial for both HD patients and at-risk individuals. Future research using the control-based model of coping in longitudinal studies with the HD population is needed, and future interventions could test the effects of cognitive reframing and acceptance as coping strategies for families affected by HD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huntington's disease","volume":" ","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huntington's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JHD-240027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Huntington's disease (HD) presents patients and individuals at risk for HD with significant levels of stress. However, relatively little research has examined how individuals cope with stress related to the disease or the association of specific coping strategies with psychological symptoms.

Objective: This study examined the ways in which HD patients and at-risk individuals cope with HD-related stress using a control-based model of coping and the association of coping strategies with symptoms of depression and anxiety.

Methods: HD patients (n = 49) and at-risk individuals (n = 76) completed the Responses to Stress Questionnaire - Huntington's Disease Version to assess coping strategies in response to HD-related stress, as well as standardized measures of depression and anxiety symptoms. Patient health records were accessed to obtain information related to disease characteristics.

Results: Patients and at-risk individuals reported using comparable levels of primary control coping, secondary control coping, and disengagement coping strategies. In linear regression analyses, only secondary control coping was significantly associated with lower depression (β= -0.62, p < 0.001) and anxiety (β= -0.59, p < 0.001) symptoms in patients and at-risk individuals (β= -0.55, p < 0.001 and β= -0.50, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: Secondary control coping may be beneficial for both HD patients and at-risk individuals. Future research using the control-based model of coping in longitudinal studies with the HD population is needed, and future interventions could test the effects of cognitive reframing and acceptance as coping strategies for families affected by HD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者和高危人群如何应对亨廷顿氏症。
背景:亨廷顿舞蹈症(Huntington's disease,HD)患者和高危人群面临着巨大的压力。然而,有关个人如何应对与该疾病相关的压力或特定应对策略与心理症状之间关系的研究相对较少:方法:HD 患者(49 人)和高危人群(76 人)填写 "对压力的反应问卷 - 亨廷顿氏病版本",以评估应对 HD 相关压力的策略,以及抑郁和焦虑症状的标准化测量。我们还查阅了患者的健康记录,以获得与疾病特征相关的信息:结果:患者和高危人群使用的主要控制应对策略、次要控制应对策略和脱离应对策略的水平相当。在线性回归分析中,只有次要控制应对策略与抑郁程度较低有显著相关性(β= -0.62,p 结论:次要控制应对策略可能对患者和高危人群都有益:二级控制应对可能对 HD 患者和高危人群都有益。未来的研究需要在针对 HD 患者的纵向研究中使用基于控制的应对模式,未来的干预措施可以测试认知重塑和接受作为应对策略对受 HD 影响的家庭的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Changes in 24(S)-Hydroxycholesterol Are Associated with Cognitive Performance in Early Huntington's Disease: Data from the TRACK and ENROLL HD Cohorts. Somatic CAG Repeat Stability in a Transgenic Sheep Model of Huntington's Disease. Mono- and Biallelic Inactivation of Huntingtin Gene in Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Reveal HTT Roles in Striatal Development and Neuronal Functions. Alterations in Cerebrospinal Fluid Urea Occur in Late Manifest Huntington's Disease. Characterizing Heart Rate Variability Response to Maximal Exercise Testing in People with Huntington's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1