Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for Prediction of Mortality in ICU Patients: A Scoping Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1177/08850666241277134
Orkideh Olang, Sana Mohseni, Ali Shahabinezhad, Yasaman Hamidianshirazi, Amireza Goli, Mansour Abolghasemian, Mohammad Ali Shafiee, Mehdi Aarabi, Mohammad Alavinia, Pouyan Shaker
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for Prediction of Mortality in ICU Patients: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Orkideh Olang, Sana Mohseni, Ali Shahabinezhad, Yasaman Hamidianshirazi, Amireza Goli, Mansour Abolghasemian, Mohammad Ali Shafiee, Mehdi Aarabi, Mohammad Alavinia, Pouyan Shaker","doi":"10.1177/08850666241277134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Healthcare professionals may be able to anticipate more accurately a patient's timing of death and assess their possibility of recovery by implementing a real-time clinical decision support system. Using such a tool, the healthcare system can better understand a patient's condition and make more informed judgements about distributing limited resources. This scoping review aimed to analyze various death prediction AI (Artificial Intelligence) algorithms that have been used in ICU (Intensive Care Unit) patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy of this study involved keyword combinations of outcome and patient setting such as mortality, survival, ICU, terminal care. These terms were used to perform database searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed up to July 2022. The variables, characteristics, and performance of the identified predictive models were summarized. The accuracy of the models was compared using their Area Under the Curve (AUC) values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Databases search yielded an initial pool of 8271 articles. A two-step screening process was then applied: first, titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance, reducing the pool to 429 articles. Next, a full-text review was conducted, further narrowing down the selection to 400 key studies. Out of 400 studies on different tools or models for prediction of mortality in ICUs, 16 papers focused on AI-based models which were ultimately included in this study that have deployed different AI-based and machine learning models to make a prediction about negative patient outcome. The accuracy and performance of the different models varied depending on the patient populations and medical conditions. It was found that AI models compared with traditional tools like SAP3 or APACHE IV score were more accurate in death prediction, with some models achieving an AUC of up to 92.9%. The overall mortality rate ranged from 5% to more than 60% in different studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that AI-based models exhibit varying performance across different patient populations. To enhance the accuracy of mortality prediction, we recommend customizing models for specific patient groups and medical contexts. By doing so, healthcare professionals may more effectively assess mortality risk and tailor treatments accordingly. Additionally, incorporating additional variables-such as genetic information-into new models can further improve their accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241277134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Healthcare professionals may be able to anticipate more accurately a patient's timing of death and assess their possibility of recovery by implementing a real-time clinical decision support system. Using such a tool, the healthcare system can better understand a patient's condition and make more informed judgements about distributing limited resources. This scoping review aimed to analyze various death prediction AI (Artificial Intelligence) algorithms that have been used in ICU (Intensive Care Unit) patient populations.

Methods: The search strategy of this study involved keyword combinations of outcome and patient setting such as mortality, survival, ICU, terminal care. These terms were used to perform database searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed up to July 2022. The variables, characteristics, and performance of the identified predictive models were summarized. The accuracy of the models was compared using their Area Under the Curve (AUC) values.

Results: Databases search yielded an initial pool of 8271 articles. A two-step screening process was then applied: first, titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance, reducing the pool to 429 articles. Next, a full-text review was conducted, further narrowing down the selection to 400 key studies. Out of 400 studies on different tools or models for prediction of mortality in ICUs, 16 papers focused on AI-based models which were ultimately included in this study that have deployed different AI-based and machine learning models to make a prediction about negative patient outcome. The accuracy and performance of the different models varied depending on the patient populations and medical conditions. It was found that AI models compared with traditional tools like SAP3 or APACHE IV score were more accurate in death prediction, with some models achieving an AUC of up to 92.9%. The overall mortality rate ranged from 5% to more than 60% in different studies.

Conclusion: We found that AI-based models exhibit varying performance across different patient populations. To enhance the accuracy of mortality prediction, we recommend customizing models for specific patient groups and medical contexts. By doing so, healthcare professionals may more effectively assess mortality risk and tailor treatments accordingly. Additionally, incorporating additional variables-such as genetic information-into new models can further improve their accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的 ICU 患者死亡率预测模型:范围综述。
背景和目的:通过实施实时临床决策支持系统,医疗保健专业人员可以更准确地预测病人的死亡时间并评估其康复的可能性。利用这种工具,医疗系统可以更好地了解病人的病情,并对有限资源的分配做出更明智的判断。本范围综述旨在分析已用于 ICU(重症监护室)患者群体的各种死亡预测 AI(人工智能)算法:本研究的搜索策略包括结果和患者环境的关键词组合,如死亡率、生存率、ICU、临终关怀。这些术语用于在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 PubMed 数据库中进行检索,检索期截至 2022 年 7 月。对已确定的预测模型的变量、特征和性能进行了总结。使用曲线下面积(AUC)值比较了模型的准确性:通过数据库搜索,初步筛选出 8271 篇文章。筛选过程分为两步:首先,对标题和摘要进行相关性审查,将文章数量减少到 429 篇。接着,进行全文审阅,进一步将筛选范围缩小到 400 篇关键研究。在 400 篇关于重症监护室死亡率预测的不同工具或模型的研究中,有 16 篇论文侧重于基于人工智能的模型,这些模型最终被纳入了本研究,这些模型采用了不同的人工智能和机器学习模型来预测患者的不良预后。不同模型的准确性和性能因患者群体和医疗条件而异。研究发现,与 SAP3 或 APACHE IV 评分等传统工具相比,人工智能模型的死亡预测更为准确,一些模型的 AUC 高达 92.9%。在不同的研究中,总死亡率从 5% 到 60% 以上不等:我们发现,基于人工智能的模型在不同的患者群体中表现出不同的性能。为了提高死亡率预测的准确性,我们建议针对特定患者群体和医疗环境定制模型。通过这样做,医疗保健专业人员可以更有效地评估死亡风险,并相应地调整治疗方法。此外,在新模型中加入更多变量(如基因信息)可进一步提高模型的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Development of an Extended Cardiovascular SOFA Score Component Reflecting Cardiac Dysfunction with Improved Survival Prediction in Sepsis: An Exploratory Analysis in the Sepsis and Elevated Troponin (SET) Study. Myoclonus After Cardiac Arrest did not Correlate with Cortical Response on Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Predicting Parental Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms Following their Child's Stay in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Prior to Discharge. Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Scoping Review. Effect of Extended Prone Positioning in Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, a Revision Letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1