Assessing superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis patency using FLOW 800 hemodynamics.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.3171/2024.4.JNS24713
Karl L Sangwon, Matthew Nguyen, Daniel D Wiggan, Bruck Negash, Daniel A Alber, Xujin Chris Liu, Albert Liu, Corinne Rabbin-Birnbaum, Vera Sharashidze, Jacob Baranoski, Eytan Raz, Maksim Shapiro, Caleb Rutledge, Peter Kim Nelson, Howard Riina, Jonathan Russin, Eric K Oermann, Erez Nossek
{"title":"Assessing superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis patency using FLOW 800 hemodynamics.","authors":"Karl L Sangwon, Matthew Nguyen, Daniel D Wiggan, Bruck Negash, Daniel A Alber, Xujin Chris Liu, Albert Liu, Corinne Rabbin-Birnbaum, Vera Sharashidze, Jacob Baranoski, Eytan Raz, Maksim Shapiro, Caleb Rutledge, Peter Kim Nelson, Howard Riina, Jonathan Russin, Eric K Oermann, Erez Nossek","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.JNS24713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the use of indocyanine green videoangiography with FLOW 800 hemodynamic parameters intraoperatively during superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery to predict patency prior to anastomosis performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective and exploratory data analysis was conducted using FLOW 800 software prior to anastomosis to assess four regions of interest (ROIs; proximal and distal recipients and adjacent and remote gyri) for four hemodynamic parameters (speed, delay, rise time, and time to peak). Medical records were used to classify patients into flow and no-flow groups based on immediate or perioperative anastomosis patency. Hemodynamic parameters were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Principal component analysis was used to identify high risk of no flow (HRnf) and low risk of no flow (LRnf) groups, correlated with prospective angiographic follow-ups. Machine learning models were fitted to predict patency using FLOW 800 features, and the a posteriori effect of complication risk of those features was computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 cases underwent STA-MCA bypass surgery with complete FLOW 800 data collection. Thirty-five cases demonstrated flow after anastomosis revascularization and were compared with 4 cases with no flow after revascularization. Proximal and distal recipient speeds were significantly different between the no-flow and flow groups (proximal: 238.3 ± 120.8 and 138.5 ± 93.6, respectively [p < 0.001]; distal: 241.0 ± 117.0 and 142.1 ± 103.8, respectively [p < 0.05]). Based on principal component analysis, the HRnf group (n = 10) was characterized by high-flow speed (> 75th percentile) in all ROIs, whereas the LRnf group (n = 10) had contrasting patterns. In prospective long-term follow-up, 6 of 9 cases in the HRnf group, including the original no-flow cases, had no or low flow, whereas 8 of 8 cases in the LRnf group maintained robust flow. Machine learning models predicted patency failure with a mean F1 score of 0.930 and consistently relied on proximal recipient speed as the most important feature. Computation of posterior likelihood showed a 95.29% chance of patients having long-term patency given a lower proximal speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that a high proximal speed measured in the recipient vessel prior to anastomosis can elevate the risk of perioperative no flow and long-term reduction of flow. With an increased dataset size, continued FLOW 800-based ROI metric analysis could be used to guide intraoperative anastomosis site selection prior to anastomosis and predict patency outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.4.JNS24713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of indocyanine green videoangiography with FLOW 800 hemodynamic parameters intraoperatively during superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery to predict patency prior to anastomosis performance.

Methods: A retrospective and exploratory data analysis was conducted using FLOW 800 software prior to anastomosis to assess four regions of interest (ROIs; proximal and distal recipients and adjacent and remote gyri) for four hemodynamic parameters (speed, delay, rise time, and time to peak). Medical records were used to classify patients into flow and no-flow groups based on immediate or perioperative anastomosis patency. Hemodynamic parameters were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Principal component analysis was used to identify high risk of no flow (HRnf) and low risk of no flow (LRnf) groups, correlated with prospective angiographic follow-ups. Machine learning models were fitted to predict patency using FLOW 800 features, and the a posteriori effect of complication risk of those features was computed.

Results: A total of 39 cases underwent STA-MCA bypass surgery with complete FLOW 800 data collection. Thirty-five cases demonstrated flow after anastomosis revascularization and were compared with 4 cases with no flow after revascularization. Proximal and distal recipient speeds were significantly different between the no-flow and flow groups (proximal: 238.3 ± 120.8 and 138.5 ± 93.6, respectively [p < 0.001]; distal: 241.0 ± 117.0 and 142.1 ± 103.8, respectively [p < 0.05]). Based on principal component analysis, the HRnf group (n = 10) was characterized by high-flow speed (> 75th percentile) in all ROIs, whereas the LRnf group (n = 10) had contrasting patterns. In prospective long-term follow-up, 6 of 9 cases in the HRnf group, including the original no-flow cases, had no or low flow, whereas 8 of 8 cases in the LRnf group maintained robust flow. Machine learning models predicted patency failure with a mean F1 score of 0.930 and consistently relied on proximal recipient speed as the most important feature. Computation of posterior likelihood showed a 95.29% chance of patients having long-term patency given a lower proximal speed.

Conclusions: These results suggest that a high proximal speed measured in the recipient vessel prior to anastomosis can elevate the risk of perioperative no flow and long-term reduction of flow. With an increased dataset size, continued FLOW 800-based ROI metric analysis could be used to guide intraoperative anastomosis site selection prior to anastomosis and predict patency outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 FLOW 800 血液动力学评估颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉吻合术的通畅性。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨在颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉(STA-MCA)搭桥手术中,术中使用吲哚青绿视频血管造影和 FLOW 800 血流动力学参数来预测吻合术前的通畅情况:方法: 在吻合术前使用 FLOW 800 软件进行了一项回顾性和探索性数据分析,以评估四个感兴趣区(ROI;近端和远端受体以及邻近和远端回旋)的四个血液动力学参数(速度、延迟、上升时间和达到峰值的时间)。根据即时或围术期吻合口通畅情况,利用病历将患者分为有血流组和无血流组。使用单变量和多变量分析比较血液动力学参数。主成分分析用于识别无血流高风险组(HRnf)和无血流低风险组(LRnf),并与前瞻性血管造影随访相关联。利用FLOW 800特征拟合机器学习模型预测通畅率,并计算这些特征对并发症风险的后验效应:结果:共有 39 例患者接受了 STA-MCA 搭桥手术,并收集了完整的 FLOW 800 数据。35例在吻合口血管再通后出现血流,与4例在血管再通后无血流的病例进行了比较。无血流组和有血流组的近端和远端受体速度有显著差异(近端:分别为 238.3 ± 120.8 和 138.5 ± 93.6 [p < 0.001];远端:分别为 241.0 ± 117.0 和 142.1 ± 103.8 [p < 0.05])。根据主成分分析,HRnf 组(n = 10)在所有 ROI 中都具有高流速(> 75 百分位数)的特征,而 LRnf 组(n = 10)则具有相反的模式。在前瞻性长期随访中,HRnf 组的 9 个病例中有 6 个(包括原来的无血流病例)没有血流或血流较低,而 LRnf 组的 8 个病例中有 8 个保持了强劲的血流。机器学习模型预测通畅失败的平均 F1 得分为 0.930,并始终将近端受体速度作为最重要的特征。后验可能性计算显示,如果近端速度较低,患者长期通畅的几率为 95.29%:这些结果表明,吻合前在受体血管中测量到的高近端速度会增加围术期无血流和长期血流减少的风险。随着数据集规模的扩大,基于 FLOW 800 的持续 ROI 指标分析可用于指导吻合术前术中吻合部位的选择并预测通畅结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor. Factors related to venous air embolism during semisitting position surgery. Multinuclear thalamic targeting with human stereotactic electroencephalography: surgical technique and nuances. Primary and salvage radiosurgery for neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningiomas. Safety of early chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A military traumatic brain injury initiative study. The impact of initial vascular morphology on outcomes in patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection presenting with isolated headache.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1