Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis: a 5-year Quality Outcomes Database study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-08-16 Print Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24112
Timothy J Yee, Campbell Liles, Sarah E Johnson, Vardhaan S Ambati, Anthony M DiGiorgio, Nima Alan, Domagoj Coric, Eric A Potts, Erica F Bisson, John J Knightly, Kai-Ming G Fu, Kevin T Foley, Mark E Shaffrey, Mohamad Bydon, Dean Chou, Andrew K Chan, Scott Meyer, Anthony L Asher, Christopher I Shaffrey, Jonathan R Slotkin, Michael Y Wang, Regis W Haid, Steven D Glassman, Michael S Virk, Praveen V Mummaneni, Paul Park
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis: a 5-year Quality Outcomes Database study.","authors":"Timothy J Yee, Campbell Liles, Sarah E Johnson, Vardhaan S Ambati, Anthony M DiGiorgio, Nima Alan, Domagoj Coric, Eric A Potts, Erica F Bisson, John J Knightly, Kai-Ming G Fu, Kevin T Foley, Mark E Shaffrey, Mohamad Bydon, Dean Chou, Andrew K Chan, Scott Meyer, Anthony L Asher, Christopher I Shaffrey, Jonathan R Slotkin, Michael Y Wang, Regis W Haid, Steven D Glassman, Michael S Virk, Praveen V Mummaneni, Paul Park","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), referred to as \"PLIF/TLIF,\" is a commonly performed operation for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Its long-term cost-effectiveness has not been well described. The aim of this study was to determine the 5-year cost-effectiveness of PLIF/TLIF for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using prospective data collected from the multicenter Quality Outcomes Database (QOD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter QOD grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis module were included if they underwent single-stage PLIF/TLIF. EQ-5D scores at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and 60 months were used to calculate gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with surgery relative to preoperative baseline. Healthcare-related costs associated with the index surgery and related reoperations were calculated using Medicare reimbursement-based cost estimates and validated using price transparency diagnosis-related group (DRG) charges and Medicare charge-to-cost ratios (CCRs). Cost per QALY gained over 60 months postoperatively was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 12 surgical centers, 385 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 60.2 (95% CI 59.1-61.3) years, and 38% of patients were male. The reoperation rate was 5.7%. DRG 460 cost estimates were stable between our Medicare reimbursement-based models and the CCR-based model, validating the focus on Medicare reimbursement. Across the entire cohort, the mean QALY gain at 60 months postoperatively was 1.07 (95% CI 0.97-1.18), and the mean cost of PLIF/TLIF was $31,634. PLIF/TLIF was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511. Among patients who did not undergo reoperation (n = 363), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 1.10 (95% CI 0.99-1.20), and cost per QALY gained was $27,591. Among those who underwent reoperation (n = 22), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 0.68 (95% CI 0.21-1.15), and the cost per QALY gained was $80,580.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PLIF/TLIF for degenerative grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511 with Medicare fees. This is far below the well-established societal willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, suggesting long-term cost-effectiveness. PLIF/TLIF remains cost-effective for patients who undergo reoperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"596-603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), referred to as "PLIF/TLIF," is a commonly performed operation for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Its long-term cost-effectiveness has not been well described. The aim of this study was to determine the 5-year cost-effectiveness of PLIF/TLIF for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using prospective data collected from the multicenter Quality Outcomes Database (QOD).

Methods: Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter QOD grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis module were included if they underwent single-stage PLIF/TLIF. EQ-5D scores at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and 60 months were used to calculate gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with surgery relative to preoperative baseline. Healthcare-related costs associated with the index surgery and related reoperations were calculated using Medicare reimbursement-based cost estimates and validated using price transparency diagnosis-related group (DRG) charges and Medicare charge-to-cost ratios (CCRs). Cost per QALY gained over 60 months postoperatively was assessed.

Results: Across 12 surgical centers, 385 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 60.2 (95% CI 59.1-61.3) years, and 38% of patients were male. The reoperation rate was 5.7%. DRG 460 cost estimates were stable between our Medicare reimbursement-based models and the CCR-based model, validating the focus on Medicare reimbursement. Across the entire cohort, the mean QALY gain at 60 months postoperatively was 1.07 (95% CI 0.97-1.18), and the mean cost of PLIF/TLIF was $31,634. PLIF/TLIF was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511. Among patients who did not undergo reoperation (n = 363), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 1.10 (95% CI 0.99-1.20), and cost per QALY gained was $27,591. Among those who underwent reoperation (n = 22), the mean 60-month QALY gain was 0.68 (95% CI 0.21-1.15), and the cost per QALY gained was $80,580.

Conclusions: PLIF/TLIF for degenerative grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis was associated with a mean 60-month cost per QALY gained of $29,511 with Medicare fees. This is far below the well-established societal willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, suggesting long-term cost-effectiveness. PLIF/TLIF remains cost-effective for patients who undergo reoperation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后路腰椎椎体间融合术和/或经椎间隙腰椎椎体间融合术治疗1级腰椎滑脱症的成本效益:为期5年的质量结果数据库研究。
目的:后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)和/或经椎间隙腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF),简称 "PLIF/TLIF",是治疗腰椎滑脱症的常用手术。其长期成本效益尚未得到很好的描述。本研究旨在利用从多中心质量结果数据库(QOD)收集的前瞻性数据,确定 PLIF/TLIF 治疗 1 级退行性腰椎滑脱症的 5 年成本效益:加入前瞻性多中心 QOD 1 级腰椎滑脱症模块的患者,如果接受了单期 PLIF/TLIF 术,均被纳入其中。采用基线、3个月、12个月、24个月、36个月和60个月时的EQ-5D评分来计算相对于术前基线的手术相关质量调整生命年(QALY)收益。与指标手术和相关再手术相关的医疗相关成本采用基于医疗保险报销的成本估算进行计算,并使用价格透明度诊断相关组(DRG)收费和医疗保险收费成本比(CCR)进行验证。结果:结果:12 个外科中心共确定了 385 名患者。患者平均年龄为 60.2 岁(95% CI 59.1-61.3),38% 的患者为男性。再次手术率为 5.7%。DRG 460 成本估算值在基于医疗保险报销的模型和基于 CCR 的模型之间保持稳定,验证了对医疗保险报销的关注。在整个队列中,术后 60 个月的平均 QALY 增益为 1.07(95% CI 0.97-1.18),PLIF/TLIF 的平均成本为 31,634 美元。PLIF/TLIF术后60个月每QALY收益的平均成本为29,511美元。在未接受再次手术的患者中(n = 363),60个月的平均QALY收益为1.10(95% CI 0.99-1.20),每个QALY收益的成本为27,591美元。在接受再次手术的患者(n = 22)中,60个月的平均QALY收益为0.68(95% CI 0.21-1.15),每个QALY收益的成本为80,580美元:PLIF/TLIF治疗退行性1级腰椎滑脱症的60个月平均每QALY收益成本为29,511美元,与医疗保险费用相关。这远远低于公认的社会支付意愿阈值 100,000 美元,表明具有长期成本效益。对于接受再次手术的患者来说,PLIF/TLIF 仍然具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial. L2 as the uppermost instrumented vertebra in lumbopelvic fusion: preserving mobility at the cost of adjacent segment degeneration? Incidence and risk factors of adjacent segment degeneration in lumbosacral or lumbo-iliac fusion with L2 as the uppermost instrumented vertebra. Disruptive technologies in spine surgery: current trends, outcomes, and ethical implications. Muscle reorientation as a novel cause of motor weakness after spinal realignment surgery: a hypothesis based on psoas muscle overstretching. Editorial. Toward sustainable adult spinal deformity correction surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1