Exploring Perspectives on Stroke Standard Set Data Collection: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Amanda McIntyre, Ovesiri Fueta, Shannon Janzen, Alexander Smith, Matthew Meyer
{"title":"Exploring Perspectives on Stroke Standard Set Data Collection: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.","authors":"Amanda McIntyre, Ovesiri Fueta, Shannon Janzen, Alexander Smith, Matthew Meyer","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: The International Consortium on Health Outcome Measurement developed a standard set for stroke (SSS) that includes patient-reported outcome measures to help capture patients' perspectives on their poststroke recovery. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of individuals who collected SSS data from patients who were admitted to hospital for a stroke. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was taken. Semistructured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with individuals employed at 2 acute neurological inpatient units in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and written text responses were analyzed directly. Transcripts were coded line by line and then organized into 5 overarching themes: adoption, acceptance, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability. RESULTS: Six interviews were conducted with participants from varying roles (eg, nurses, manager, web developer, social worker, medical clerk). Participants reported that patients were receptive to completing the SSS. Follow-up phone calls provided a significant opportunity to monitor patients' recovery postdischarge. Many patients requested medical guidance and help navigating health and social resources for unmet stroke-related needs. Barriers to consistent SSS assessment included high employee turnover and lack of time, space, or capacity for follow-up. To sustain data collection, a dedicated, financially supported neurological nursing role was suggested. CONCLUSION: Participants were supportive of SSS data collection that could provide monitoring, oversight, and follow-up of stroke patients after discharge from acute care. However, the utility of the dataset is heavily dependent on having the data collection process properly resourced.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"219-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The International Consortium on Health Outcome Measurement developed a standard set for stroke (SSS) that includes patient-reported outcome measures to help capture patients' perspectives on their poststroke recovery. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of individuals who collected SSS data from patients who were admitted to hospital for a stroke. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was taken. Semistructured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with individuals employed at 2 acute neurological inpatient units in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and written text responses were analyzed directly. Transcripts were coded line by line and then organized into 5 overarching themes: adoption, acceptance, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability. RESULTS: Six interviews were conducted with participants from varying roles (eg, nurses, manager, web developer, social worker, medical clerk). Participants reported that patients were receptive to completing the SSS. Follow-up phone calls provided a significant opportunity to monitor patients' recovery postdischarge. Many patients requested medical guidance and help navigating health and social resources for unmet stroke-related needs. Barriers to consistent SSS assessment included high employee turnover and lack of time, space, or capacity for follow-up. To sustain data collection, a dedicated, financially supported neurological nursing role was suggested. CONCLUSION: Participants were supportive of SSS data collection that could provide monitoring, oversight, and follow-up of stroke patients after discharge from acute care. However, the utility of the dataset is heavily dependent on having the data collection process properly resourced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索卒中标准组数据收集的视角:定性描述研究。
摘要:背景:国际健康结果测量联盟(International Consortium on Health Outcome Measurement)制定了一套卒中标准(SSS),其中包括患者报告的结果测量,以帮助捕捉患者对卒中后康复的看法。本研究旨在探讨从因中风入院的患者处收集 SSS 数据的个人的经验和观点。方法:采用定性描述的方法。对加拿大安大略省西南部两家急性神经病住院部的工作人员进行了半结构化录音访谈。对访谈内容进行了逐字记录,并直接分析了书面文字回复。逐行对记录进行编码,然后归纳为 5 个重要主题:采用、接受、适当性、可行性和可持续性。结果:共进行了六次访谈,参与者的角色各不相同(如护士、经理、网络开发人员、社会工作者、医务文员)。参与者表示,患者乐于填写 SSS。随访电话为监测患者出院后的恢复情况提供了重要机会。许多患者要求获得医疗指导和帮助,以获得医疗和社会资源,满足与中风相关的未满足需求。持续进行 SSS 评估的障碍包括员工更替率高以及缺乏时间、空间或能力进行随访。为了持续收集数据,建议设立一个专门的、有资金支持的神经科护理职位。结论:参与者支持收集 SSS 数据,以便对急性期出院后的卒中患者进行监测、监督和随访。然而,数据集的实用性在很大程度上取决于数据收集过程是否有适当的资源支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a Nurse-Initiated Protocol to Improve Enteral Medication Administration Documentation in Stroke Patients. Methods for Developing Neuroscience Nursing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Development of an Acute Stroke Care Seeking Framework. Exploring Perspectives on Stroke Standard Set Data Collection: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Measures and Influencers of Reintegration for the Stroke Patient: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1