Implementing Advance Care Planning and Care Coordination in the Care for People With Parkinson Disease: A Feasibility Study.

Herma Lennaerts-Kats, Laura Daeter, Anoek Forkink, Renate K Hukema, Bastiaan R Bloem, Kris C P Vissers, Marjan J Meinders, Marieke M Groot
{"title":"Implementing Advance Care Planning and Care Coordination in the Care for People With Parkinson Disease: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Herma Lennaerts-Kats, Laura Daeter, Anoek Forkink, Renate K Hukema, Bastiaan R Bloem, Kris C P Vissers, Marjan J Meinders, Marieke M Groot","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: For people with a moderate stage of Parkinson disease (PD), dedicated care coordination combined with advance care planning (ACP) is highly needed. However, evidence is lacking. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study processes to inform a larger randomized controlled trial, aiming the effectiveness of a combined intervention on ACP and care coordination for people with PD. METHODS: Two nurse practitioners with expertise in PD followed training on a combined intervention on ACP and care coordination. Patients were invited to participate in several sessions for a period of 12 months. Feasibility of the study was surveyed covering sample recruitment, attrition rate, eligibility, intervention delivery, number of ACP sessions, type of intervention administration, and satisfaction with the intervention. RESULTS: In total, 27 patients were invited to participate, and 20 (74%) enrolled into the study, together with 11 family caregivers; 7 patients (35%) dropped out. Most patients were men (n = 20), with a mean age of 73.4 (SD 8.2) years. In total, 71 ACP sessions were held (3.6 sessions per patient on average), of which 41% of the sessions were conducted face-to-face at home, 44% at the hospital, 11% over telephone, and 4% via a videoconference call. Patients perceived the intervention not only as supportive but also as confronting. CONCLUSION: The ACP aspect of the intervention was useful and feasible to stimulate patients to think about their current care situation as well as about future care. Care coordination was less profoundly provided and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"174-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: For people with a moderate stage of Parkinson disease (PD), dedicated care coordination combined with advance care planning (ACP) is highly needed. However, evidence is lacking. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study processes to inform a larger randomized controlled trial, aiming the effectiveness of a combined intervention on ACP and care coordination for people with PD. METHODS: Two nurse practitioners with expertise in PD followed training on a combined intervention on ACP and care coordination. Patients were invited to participate in several sessions for a period of 12 months. Feasibility of the study was surveyed covering sample recruitment, attrition rate, eligibility, intervention delivery, number of ACP sessions, type of intervention administration, and satisfaction with the intervention. RESULTS: In total, 27 patients were invited to participate, and 20 (74%) enrolled into the study, together with 11 family caregivers; 7 patients (35%) dropped out. Most patients were men (n = 20), with a mean age of 73.4 (SD 8.2) years. In total, 71 ACP sessions were held (3.6 sessions per patient on average), of which 41% of the sessions were conducted face-to-face at home, 44% at the hospital, 11% over telephone, and 4% via a videoconference call. Patients perceived the intervention not only as supportive but also as confronting. CONCLUSION: The ACP aspect of the intervention was useful and feasible to stimulate patients to think about their current care situation as well as about future care. Care coordination was less profoundly provided and discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在帕金森病患者护理中实施预先护理规划和护理协调:可行性研究。
摘要:背景:对于帕金森病(PD)中度患者而言,非常需要专门的护理协调与预先护理计划(ACP)相结合。然而,目前还缺乏相关证据。本研究的目的是评估研究过程的可行性和可接受性,为更大规模的随机对照试验提供依据,旨在研究对帕金森病患者进行预先护理规划和护理协调联合干预的有效性。方法:两名具有帕金森病专业知识的执业护士接受了关于ACP和护理协调联合干预的培训。患者应邀参加了为期 12 个月的多次培训。对研究的可行性进行了调查,包括样本招募、自然减员率、资格、干预实施、ACP疗程次数、干预实施类型以及对干预的满意度。结果:共有 27 名患者应邀参加了研究,其中 20 人(74%)与 11 名家庭护理人员一起加入了研究;7 名患者(35%)退出了研究。大多数患者为男性(n = 20),平均年龄为 73.4 岁(标准差为 8.2)。共进行了 71 次 ACP 治疗(平均每位患者 3.6 次),其中 41% 的治疗在家中面对面进行,44% 在医院进行,11% 通过电话进行,4% 通过视频电话会议进行。患者认为干预不仅是支持性的,也是对抗性的。结论:ACP 方面的干预措施对于激发患者思考其当前的护理状况和未来的护理是有用的,也是可行的。护理协调的提供和讨论不太深入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a Nurse-Initiated Protocol to Improve Enteral Medication Administration Documentation in Stroke Patients. Methods for Developing Neuroscience Nursing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Development of an Acute Stroke Care Seeking Framework. Exploring Perspectives on Stroke Standard Set Data Collection: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Measures and Influencers of Reintegration for the Stroke Patient: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1