Robotic companions and healthy aging: A mixed-methods exploration of older adults' perspectives and insights

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102689
{"title":"Robotic companions and healthy aging: A mixed-methods exploration of older adults' perspectives and insights","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates older adults' perceptions and opinions regarding companion robots, contributing to the understanding of the benefits and risks associated with technology designed for senior users. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we first conducted qualitative research to explore key concepts and variables, followed by quantitative testing of the proposed model. The qualitative phase involved online interviews with 182 participants aged 55 or older. Data were analyzed using NVivo software, employing thematic analysis to identify conceptually similar themes. Six primary themes emerged, categorized into perceived benefits (health and wellness, companionship and support, and technology design advantages) and perceived risks (digital dependency and social disconnection, information integrity and online resilience, and implementation costs). Based on the qualitative findings, we developed a research model comprising six hypotheses. The model was subsequently tested quantitatively using structural equation modeling via AMOS with data from 313 adults aged 55 or older. All hypotheses were supported, with the model demonstrating an explanatory power of 56 %. Results indicate that while companion robots offer potential social and emotional support for older adults, they also present significant challenges. The study highlights the importance of balancing the advantages of companion robots with their potential drawbacks. These findings have implications for the design and implementation of smart healthcare devices for older populations, suggesting that maximizing benefits while mitigating risks could enhance adoption and utilization. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on Age technology, offering insights for researchers, technology designers, and healthcare providers working to improve the quality of life for older adults through technological innovations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002379","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates older adults' perceptions and opinions regarding companion robots, contributing to the understanding of the benefits and risks associated with technology designed for senior users. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we first conducted qualitative research to explore key concepts and variables, followed by quantitative testing of the proposed model. The qualitative phase involved online interviews with 182 participants aged 55 or older. Data were analyzed using NVivo software, employing thematic analysis to identify conceptually similar themes. Six primary themes emerged, categorized into perceived benefits (health and wellness, companionship and support, and technology design advantages) and perceived risks (digital dependency and social disconnection, information integrity and online resilience, and implementation costs). Based on the qualitative findings, we developed a research model comprising six hypotheses. The model was subsequently tested quantitatively using structural equation modeling via AMOS with data from 313 adults aged 55 or older. All hypotheses were supported, with the model demonstrating an explanatory power of 56 %. Results indicate that while companion robots offer potential social and emotional support for older adults, they also present significant challenges. The study highlights the importance of balancing the advantages of companion robots with their potential drawbacks. These findings have implications for the design and implementation of smart healthcare devices for older populations, suggesting that maximizing benefits while mitigating risks could enhance adoption and utilization. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on Age technology, offering insights for researchers, technology designers, and healthcare providers working to improve the quality of life for older adults through technological innovations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人伴侣与健康老龄化:以混合方法探讨老年人的观点和见解
本研究调查了老年人对陪伴机器人的看法和意见,有助于人们了解专为老年用户设计的技术所带来的益处和风险。我们采用混合方法,首先进行定性研究,探索关键概念和变量,然后对提出的模型进行定量测试。在定性研究阶段,我们对 182 名 55 岁或以上的参与者进行了在线访谈。我们使用 NVivo 软件对数据进行了分析,并采用主题分析来确定概念上相似的主题。我们发现了六个主要的主题,分为感知到的益处(健康与保健、陪伴与支持、技术设计优势)和感知到的风险(数字依赖与社会脱节、信息完整性与在线复原力、实施成本)。在定性研究结果的基础上,我们建立了一个包含六个假设的研究模型。随后,我们通过 AMOS 使用结构方程模型对该模型进行了定量测试,数据来自 313 名 55 岁及以上的成年人。所有假设均得到支持,模型的解释力达到 56%。结果表明,虽然陪伴机器人为老年人提供了潜在的社交和情感支持,但也带来了巨大的挑战。这项研究强调了平衡陪伴机器人的优点和潜在缺点的重要性。这些发现对老年人智能医疗保健设备的设计和实施具有启示意义,表明在降低风险的同时最大限度地发挥其优势,可以提高设备的采用率和利用率。这项研究为日益增多的有关老年技术的文献做出了贡献,为研究人员、技术设计人员和医疗保健提供者提供了见解,帮助他们通过技术创新提高老年人的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
Potential risk and efficiency analysis of decision-making dilemmas in connected dual-vehicle interactions at uncontrolled intersections Knowledge source switching under state interventions of latecomer regions: A case study of Shenzhen Can cluster analysis enrich the innovation resistance theory? The case of mobile payment usage in Italy Pathway towards SME competitiveness: Digital capability and digital business model innovation Forecasting the evolution of urban mobility: The influence of anthropomorphism and social responsiveness in the transition from human to automated driving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1