Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction outcomes based on left ventricular ejection fraction.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hellenic Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.007
Yong Hoon Kim, Ae-Young Her, Seung-Woon Rha, Cheol Ung Choi, Byoung Geol Choi, Soohyung Park, Dong Oh Kang, Se Yeon Choi, Jinah Cha, Su Jin Hyun, Jung Rae Cho, Min-Woong Kim, Ji Young Park, Sang-Ho Park, Myung Ho Jeong
{"title":"Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction outcomes based on left ventricular ejection fraction.","authors":"Yong Hoon Kim, Ae-Young Her, Seung-Woon Rha, Cheol Ung Choi, Byoung Geol Choi, Soohyung Park, Dong Oh Kang, Se Yeon Choi, Jinah Cha, Su Jin Hyun, Jung Rae Cho, Min-Woong Kim, Ji Young Park, Sang-Ho Park, Myung Ho Jeong","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to compare the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We categorized 4558 patients with NSTEMI as either RASI users (3752 patients) or non-users (806 patients). The 3-year patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), which included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (HF), was the primary outcome. To compare clinical outcomes, a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was calculated after performing multicollinearity tests on all significant confounding variables (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among RASI users, the aHRs for POCO, all-cause death, and cardiac death were significantly higher in the HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) subgroup than in the HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) (1.610, 2.120, and 2.489; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) (2.234, 3.920, and 5.215; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) subgroups. The aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFmrEF subgroup than the HFpEF subgroup (1.416, 1.843, and 2.172, respectively). Among RASI non-users, the aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFrEF subgroup than the HFmrEF (2.573, 3.172, and 3.762, respectively) and HFpEF (2.425, 3.805, and 4.178, respectively) subgroups. In three LVEF subgroups, RASI users exhibited lower aHRs for POCO and all-cause death than RASI non-users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the RASI users group, the aHRs for POCO and mortality were highest in the HFrEF subgroup, intermediate in the HFmrEF subgroup, and lowest in the HFpEF subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to compare the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Methods: We categorized 4558 patients with NSTEMI as either RASI users (3752 patients) or non-users (806 patients). The 3-year patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), which included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (HF), was the primary outcome. To compare clinical outcomes, a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was calculated after performing multicollinearity tests on all significant confounding variables (P < 0.05).

Results: Among RASI users, the aHRs for POCO, all-cause death, and cardiac death were significantly higher in the HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) subgroup than in the HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) (1.610, 2.120, and 2.489; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) (2.234, 3.920, and 5.215; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) subgroups. The aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFmrEF subgroup than the HFpEF subgroup (1.416, 1.843, and 2.172, respectively). Among RASI non-users, the aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFrEF subgroup than the HFmrEF (2.573, 3.172, and 3.762, respectively) and HFpEF (2.425, 3.805, and 4.178, respectively) subgroups. In three LVEF subgroups, RASI users exhibited lower aHRs for POCO and all-cause death than RASI non-users.

Conclusion: In the RASI users group, the aHRs for POCO and mortality were highest in the HFrEF subgroup, intermediate in the HFmrEF subgroup, and lowest in the HFpEF subgroup.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于左心室射血分数的肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的预后。
背景:我们评估了左心室射血分数(LVEF),以比较肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASI)对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的影响:我们将 4558 例 NSTEMI 患者分为 RASI 使用者(3752 例)和非使用者(806 例)。3年以患者为导向的综合结果(POCO)是主要结果,包括全因死亡、复发性心肌梗死、任何重复血管再通或因心衰(HF)住院。为了比较临床结果,在对所有重要混杂变量进行多重共线性测试后,计算了经多变量调整的危险比(aHR)(P在 RASI 用户组中,HFrEF 亚组的 POCO 和死亡率 aHR 最高,HFmrEF 亚组居中,HFpEF 亚组最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of continuous flow centrifugal left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant strategy in a low organ donation environment: Single center experience. Impact of three-month treatment with pitavastatin on arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a prospective observational study. Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of giant cavernous hemangioma of the right ventricle. Comparing the predictive ability of GRACE 2.0 and GRACE 3.0 scores in a Greek cohort of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome. New guidelines of EACTS/STS on aortic disease: A useful tool for the management of "aortic organ" disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1