Perinatal substance use treatment and criminal legal system referral trends

{"title":"Perinatal substance use treatment and criminal legal system referral trends","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To guide improvements in treatment for pregnant persons with substance use disorders within the criminal legal system, treatment programs must first determine the primary substances of concern for this population. The objective of this study is to compare trends in specific substance use upon admission to treatment in pregnancy, based upon whether referrals originated from the criminal legal system or from another referral source.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This research accessed data on perinatal substance use (1995–2021) and referral sources from the Treatment Episode Data Set-Admissions (TEDS-A). Analyses use multiple logistic regressions to evaluate trends in primary substance use leading to treatment admission during pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Approximately 1 % (<em>N</em> = 536,948) of all substance use treatment admissions in TEDS-A were for pregnant people. Between 1995 and 2021, the percentage of treatment admissions increased for primary methamphetamine use (10 % to 27 %), primary opioid use (21 % to 38 %), and primary cannabis use (9 % to 18 %), and decreased for primary cocaine use (32 % to 6 %) and primary alcohol use (26 % to 11 %). By 2021, treatment admissions referred from criminal legal agencies were more likely to primarily be for primary methamphetamine use (33 % vs 25 %) and less likely to be for primary opioid use (22 % vs 42 %) compared to other referral sources.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Trends in substance use treatment during pregnancy have changed substantially over the past few decades and emphasize the unique needs of patients referred to treatment by the criminal legal system. Treatment programs must therefore adapt to fluctuating trends in perinatal substance use. In particular, it is important to expand programs that prioritize treatment of methamphetamine use disorder for pregnant people referred through criminal legal agencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To guide improvements in treatment for pregnant persons with substance use disorders within the criminal legal system, treatment programs must first determine the primary substances of concern for this population. The objective of this study is to compare trends in specific substance use upon admission to treatment in pregnancy, based upon whether referrals originated from the criminal legal system or from another referral source.

Methods

This research accessed data on perinatal substance use (1995–2021) and referral sources from the Treatment Episode Data Set-Admissions (TEDS-A). Analyses use multiple logistic regressions to evaluate trends in primary substance use leading to treatment admission during pregnancy.

Results

Approximately 1 % (N = 536,948) of all substance use treatment admissions in TEDS-A were for pregnant people. Between 1995 and 2021, the percentage of treatment admissions increased for primary methamphetamine use (10 % to 27 %), primary opioid use (21 % to 38 %), and primary cannabis use (9 % to 18 %), and decreased for primary cocaine use (32 % to 6 %) and primary alcohol use (26 % to 11 %). By 2021, treatment admissions referred from criminal legal agencies were more likely to primarily be for primary methamphetamine use (33 % vs 25 %) and less likely to be for primary opioid use (22 % vs 42 %) compared to other referral sources.

Conclusions

Trends in substance use treatment during pregnancy have changed substantially over the past few decades and emphasize the unique needs of patients referred to treatment by the criminal legal system. Treatment programs must therefore adapt to fluctuating trends in perinatal substance use. In particular, it is important to expand programs that prioritize treatment of methamphetamine use disorder for pregnant people referred through criminal legal agencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期药物使用治疗和刑事法律系统转介趋势。
导言:为了指导改善对刑事法律系统中患有药物使用障碍的孕妇的治疗,治疗计划必须首先确定这一人群主要关注的药物。本研究的目的是根据转介是来自刑事法律系统还是其他转介来源,比较孕妇在接受治疗时使用特定药物的趋势:本研究从治疗事件数据集-入院治疗(TEDS-A)中获取了围产期药物使用(1995-2021 年)和转诊来源的数据。使用多重逻辑回归进行分析,以评估怀孕期间导致入院治疗的主要药物使用趋势:在 TEDS-A 收治的所有药物使用患者中,约有 1%(N=536,948)为孕妇。从 1995 年到 2021 年,主要使用甲基苯丙胺(10% 到 27%)、主要使用阿片类药物(21% 到 38%)和主要使用大麻(9% 到 18%)的入院治疗比例有所上升,而主要使用可卡因(32% 到 6%)和主要使用酒精(26% 到 11%)的入院治疗比例有所下降。到 2021 年,与其他转介来源相比,刑事法律机构转介的接受治疗者更有可能主要是因为初次吸食甲基苯丙胺(33% 对 25%),而初次吸食阿片类药物(22% 对 42%)的可能性较小:在过去几十年中,孕期药物使用治疗的趋势发生了很大变化,并强调了由刑事法律系统转介到治疗机构的患者的独特需求。因此,治疗项目必须适应围产期药物使用的波动趋势。尤其重要的是,要扩大优先治疗通过刑事法律机构转介的孕妇甲基苯丙胺使用障碍的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent SMART: Effects of residential treatment and an adjunctive parenting intervention on behavioral health services utilization. “Yeah, this is not going to work for me”–The impact of federal policy restrictions on methadone continuation upon release from jail or prison A community-academic partnership to develop an implementation support package for overdose prevention in permanent supportive housing Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder Is naloxone where it needs to be? Using spatial analytics to examine equitable distribution of community-based naloxone sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1