Prediction of CD8+T lymphocyte infiltration levels in gastric cancer from contrast-enhanced CT and clinical factors using machine learning

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1002/mp.17350
Wentao Xie, Sheng Jiang, Fangjie Xin, Zinian Jiang, Wenjun Pan, Xiaoming Zhou, Shuai Xiang, Zhenying Xu, Yun Lu, Dongsheng Wang
{"title":"Prediction of CD8+T lymphocyte infiltration levels in gastric cancer from contrast-enhanced CT and clinical factors using machine learning","authors":"Wentao Xie,&nbsp;Sheng Jiang,&nbsp;Fangjie Xin,&nbsp;Zinian Jiang,&nbsp;Wenjun Pan,&nbsp;Xiaoming Zhou,&nbsp;Shuai Xiang,&nbsp;Zhenying Xu,&nbsp;Yun Lu,&nbsp;Dongsheng Wang","doi":"10.1002/mp.17350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration is closely associated with the prognosis and immunotherapy response of gastric cancer (GC). For now, the examination of CD8 infiltration levels relies on endoscopic biopsy, which is invasive and unsuitable for longitude assessment during anti-tumor therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This work aims to develop and validate a noninvasive workflow based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images to evaluate the CD8+ T-cell infiltration profiles of GC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>GC patients were retrospectively and consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to the training (validation) or test cohort at a 7:3 ratio. All patients were binary classified into the CD8-high (infiltrated proportion ≥ 20%) or CD8-low group (infiltrated proportion &lt; 20%) group. A total of 1170 radiomics features were extracted from each presurgical CECT series. After feature selection, fifteen radiomics features were transmitted to three independent machine-learning models for the computation of predictive radiological scores. Multilayer perceptron (MLP) was applied to merge the radiological scores with clinical factors. The predictive efficacy of the radiological scores and of the combined model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis in both the training and test cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 210 patients were enrolled in this study (mean age: 63.22 ± 8.74 years, 151 men), and were randomly assigned to the training set (<i>n</i> = 147) or the test set (<i>n</i> = 63). The merged radiological score was correlated with CD8 infiltration in both the training (<i>p</i> = 1.8e−10) and test cohorts (<i>p</i> = 0.00026). The combined model integrating the radiological scores and clinical features achieved an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.872–0.960) in the training set and 0.844 (95% CI: 0.742–0.946) in the test set for classifying CD8-high GCs. The model was well-calibrated and exhibited net benefit over “treat-all” and“treat-none” strategies in decision curve analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Artificial intelligent systems combining radiological features and clinical factors could accurately predict CD8 infiltration levels of GC, which may benefit personalized treatment of GC in the context of immunotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"51 10","pages":"7108-7118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17350","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration is closely associated with the prognosis and immunotherapy response of gastric cancer (GC). For now, the examination of CD8 infiltration levels relies on endoscopic biopsy, which is invasive and unsuitable for longitude assessment during anti-tumor therapy.

Purpose

This work aims to develop and validate a noninvasive workflow based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images to evaluate the CD8+ T-cell infiltration profiles of GC.

Methods

GC patients were retrospectively and consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to the training (validation) or test cohort at a 7:3 ratio. All patients were binary classified into the CD8-high (infiltrated proportion ≥ 20%) or CD8-low group (infiltrated proportion < 20%) group. A total of 1170 radiomics features were extracted from each presurgical CECT series. After feature selection, fifteen radiomics features were transmitted to three independent machine-learning models for the computation of predictive radiological scores. Multilayer perceptron (MLP) was applied to merge the radiological scores with clinical factors. The predictive efficacy of the radiological scores and of the combined model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis in both the training and test cohorts.

Results

A total of 210 patients were enrolled in this study (mean age: 63.22 ± 8.74 years, 151 men), and were randomly assigned to the training set (n = 147) or the test set (n = 63). The merged radiological score was correlated with CD8 infiltration in both the training (p = 1.8e−10) and test cohorts (p = 0.00026). The combined model integrating the radiological scores and clinical features achieved an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.872–0.960) in the training set and 0.844 (95% CI: 0.742–0.946) in the test set for classifying CD8-high GCs. The model was well-calibrated and exhibited net benefit over “treat-all” and“treat-none” strategies in decision curve analysis.

Conclusions

Artificial intelligent systems combining radiological features and clinical factors could accurately predict CD8 infiltration levels of GC, which may benefit personalized treatment of GC in the context of immunotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习从对比增强 CT 和临床因素预测胃癌 CD8+T 淋巴细胞浸润水平
背景:CD8+ T淋巴细胞浸润与胃癌(GC)的预后和免疫治疗反应密切相关。目的:本研究旨在开发并验证一种基于对比增强 CT(CECT)图像的无创工作流程,以评估 GC 的 CD8+ T 细胞浸润情况:回顾性连续入组 GC 患者,并按 7:3 的比例随机分配到训练队列(验证)或测试队列。所有患者都被二元分为 CD8 高组(浸润比例≥ 20%)或 CD8 低组(浸润比例≥ 20%):共有 210 名患者(平均年龄:63.22 ± 8.74 岁,男性 151 人)参加了这项研究,并被随机分配到训练集(n = 147)或测试集(n = 63)。在训练组(p = 1.8e-10)和测试组(p = 0.00026)中,合并的放射学评分与 CD8 浸润相关。在对 CD8 高的 GC 进行分类时,整合了放射学评分和临床特征的组合模型在训练集中的曲线下面积(AUC)值为 0.916(95% CI:0.872-0.960),在测试集中的曲线下面积(AUC)值为 0.844(95% CI:0.742-0.946)。该模型校准良好,在决策曲线分析中显示出比 "全部治疗 "和 "不治疗 "策略更优的净效益:结论:结合放射学特征和临床因素的人工智能系统可以准确预测 GC 的 CD8 浸润水平,这可能有利于免疫疗法背景下的 GC 个性化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover List of Advertisers Issue Information List of Advertisers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1