Effects of an mHealth intervention on maternal and infant outcomes from pregnancy to early postpartum for women with overweight or obesity: A randomized controlled trial

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104143
{"title":"Effects of an mHealth intervention on maternal and infant outcomes from pregnancy to early postpartum for women with overweight or obesity: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Women with overweight (OW) and those with obesity (OB) tend to gain excessive weight during pregnancy, often resulting in adverse outcomes. The long-term effects of mobile health (mHealth) interventions on maternal and infant outcomes remain unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine the effects of an mHealth intervention on OW and OB from the course of their pregnancy to six months postpartum.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial was conducted in northern Taiwan. Ninety-two pregnant women with a body mass index (BMI)<span><math><mspace></mspace></math></span>of ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were recruited from prenatal clinics at &lt;17 weeks of gestation. Prepregnancy weight was baseline maternal weight, with data collected subsequently at the last assessment before childbirth and six months postpartum. The intervention group (IG) received the mHealth intervention, while the control group (CG) received standard antenatal care. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04553731) with the initial registration date of September 16, 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The IG tended to have a lower mean body weight than the CG at the last assessment before childbirth (82.23 kg vs 84.35 kg) and at six months postpartum (72.55 Kg vs 72.58 Kg). IG's newborn birth weight was significantly lower than CG's (3074.8 vs. 3313.6 g; <em>p</em> = 0.009). Regression analysis revealed that OB in IG had a significant reduction in weight before childbirth (β = -7.51, <em>p</em> = 0.005) compared to OB in CG. Compared to OW in CG, both OW in IG (β = -243.59, <em>p</em> = 0.027) and OB in IG (β = -324.59, <em>p</em> = 0.049) were associated with decreased newborn birth weight.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>mHealth helped women with obesity to successfully manage their GWG and body weight before childbirth and newborns’ birth weight, despite this effect not persisting to reduce weight retention at six months postpartum.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Women with overweight (OW) and those with obesity (OB) tend to gain excessive weight during pregnancy, often resulting in adverse outcomes. The long-term effects of mobile health (mHealth) interventions on maternal and infant outcomes remain unclear.

Aims

To examine the effects of an mHealth intervention on OW and OB from the course of their pregnancy to six months postpartum.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in northern Taiwan. Ninety-two pregnant women with a body mass index (BMI)of ≥25 kg/m2 were recruited from prenatal clinics at <17 weeks of gestation. Prepregnancy weight was baseline maternal weight, with data collected subsequently at the last assessment before childbirth and six months postpartum. The intervention group (IG) received the mHealth intervention, while the control group (CG) received standard antenatal care. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04553731) with the initial registration date of September 16, 2020.

Findings

The IG tended to have a lower mean body weight than the CG at the last assessment before childbirth (82.23 kg vs 84.35 kg) and at six months postpartum (72.55 Kg vs 72.58 Kg). IG's newborn birth weight was significantly lower than CG's (3074.8 vs. 3313.6 g; p = 0.009). Regression analysis revealed that OB in IG had a significant reduction in weight before childbirth (β = -7.51, p = 0.005) compared to OB in CG. Compared to OW in CG, both OW in IG (β = -243.59, p = 0.027) and OB in IG (β = -324.59, p = 0.049) were associated with decreased newborn birth weight.

Conclusions

mHealth helped women with obesity to successfully manage their GWG and body weight before childbirth and newborns’ birth weight, despite this effect not persisting to reduce weight retention at six months postpartum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动保健干预对超重或肥胖妇女从怀孕到产后早期的母婴结果的影响:随机对照试验
背景超重(OW)妇女和肥胖(OB)妇女在怀孕期间往往体重增加过多,常常导致不良后果。移动医疗干预对母婴结果的长期影响仍不清楚。目的 研究移动医疗干预对孕期至产后六个月的超重和肥胖妇女的影响。在妊娠 17 周时,从产前诊所招募了 92 名体重指数 (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 的孕妇。孕前体重是孕妇的基准体重,随后在分娩前最后一次评估和产后六个月收集数据。干预组(IG)接受移动医疗干预,对照组(CG)接受标准产前护理。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(标识符:NCT04553731),初始注册日期为 2020 年 9 月 16 日。研究结果在产前最后一次评估(82.23 千克 vs 84.35 千克)和产后六个月评估(72.55 千克 vs 72.58 千克)时,干预组的平均体重往往低于对照组。IG 的新生儿出生体重明显低于 CG(3074.8 克 vs. 3313.6 克;P = 0.009)。回归分析显示,IG 中的产妇在分娩前的体重比 CG 中的产妇明显降低(β = -7.51,p = 0.005)。与 CG 中的 OW 相比,IG 中的 OW(β = -243.59,p = 0.027)和 IG 中的 OB(β = -324.59,p = 0.049)均与新生儿出生体重的下降有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Maternal experiences and preference of maternity services in Singapore: A descriptive qualitative study. Breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers: The body image and emotional intelligence perspective Perspectives of health care providers on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound in lower-level health facilities in Kenya. Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review. Perceived stress and prenatal depression symptoms among couples with gestational diabetes mellitus: The mediating role of dyadic coping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1