Interdisciplinary reflection by higher education academics using teaching squares: A scoping review

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106353
Joanne Harmon , Angela Brown , David Birbeck , Josephine Crockett , Shila Panadgoo , Abu Nawas , Andrea Stringer , Maurizio Costabile
{"title":"Interdisciplinary reflection by higher education academics using teaching squares: A scoping review","authors":"Joanne Harmon ,&nbsp;Angela Brown ,&nbsp;David Birbeck ,&nbsp;Josephine Crockett ,&nbsp;Shila Panadgoo ,&nbsp;Abu Nawas ,&nbsp;Andrea Stringer ,&nbsp;Maurizio Costabile","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the use of teaching squares by interdisciplinary Higher Education (HE) academics when engaging in a cycle of teaching reflection.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A scoping review of published and unpublished research between 2012 and 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>Systematic search of ten (10) electronic databases and hand searching of reference lists identified 13 studies for review.</p></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><p>Studies were included if reflection was undertaken on teaching and involved the disciplines of Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Sciences. The data were extracted and charted and presented using the Patterns, Advances, Gap, Evidence for practice and Research [PAGER] framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The main theme identified in the review was that teaching squares led to the development of improved pedagogical skills. This skills improvement was facilitated by the creation of positive academic relationships formed by undertaking interdisciplinary observation, reflection and other serendipitous events. HE academics gained positive benefits from this process, especially those newly transitioning into academia. Some examples of these benefits included increased awareness of one's own teaching practice, deeper understanding of the student experiences and the HE academic feeling less isolated and more reassured about their teaching. Undertaking interdisciplinary reflection led to the development of social capital, resulting in increased confidence. This was evident by the development of new professional relationships from increased networking opportunities external to the faculty in which the HE academic was located. The culture within each context served as either a barrier or facilitator to engaging in reflection. We also noted there were a variety of ways in which reflection was being undertaken, with new insights gained during COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This scoping review explored the current published literature on reflection on teaching undertaken by HE academics within Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy and Biomedical Science disciplines. The key outcomes for the interdisciplinary stakeholders were increased levels of confidence, learning of new ways of teaching, and insight into the student experience by undertaking interdisciplinary reflection. From a faculty perspective this is meant there was an increase of social network development and provided higher levels of social capital, especially for those transitioning into academia. The pandemic led to an increased reliance on reflection of virtual reflection, which may become the norm. Further research is required to explore the experiences and perceptions of reflection for this cohort of HE teachers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 106353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002636/pdfft?md5=fb1753a946fb415c9a8242eee5423975&pid=1-s2.0-S0260691724002636-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the use of teaching squares by interdisciplinary Higher Education (HE) academics when engaging in a cycle of teaching reflection.

Design

A scoping review of published and unpublished research between 2012 and 2022.

Data sources

Systematic search of ten (10) electronic databases and hand searching of reference lists identified 13 studies for review.

Review methods

Studies were included if reflection was undertaken on teaching and involved the disciplines of Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Sciences. The data were extracted and charted and presented using the Patterns, Advances, Gap, Evidence for practice and Research [PAGER] framework.

Results

The main theme identified in the review was that teaching squares led to the development of improved pedagogical skills. This skills improvement was facilitated by the creation of positive academic relationships formed by undertaking interdisciplinary observation, reflection and other serendipitous events. HE academics gained positive benefits from this process, especially those newly transitioning into academia. Some examples of these benefits included increased awareness of one's own teaching practice, deeper understanding of the student experiences and the HE academic feeling less isolated and more reassured about their teaching. Undertaking interdisciplinary reflection led to the development of social capital, resulting in increased confidence. This was evident by the development of new professional relationships from increased networking opportunities external to the faculty in which the HE academic was located. The culture within each context served as either a barrier or facilitator to engaging in reflection. We also noted there were a variety of ways in which reflection was being undertaken, with new insights gained during COVID-19.

Conclusion

This scoping review explored the current published literature on reflection on teaching undertaken by HE academics within Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy and Biomedical Science disciplines. The key outcomes for the interdisciplinary stakeholders were increased levels of confidence, learning of new ways of teaching, and insight into the student experience by undertaking interdisciplinary reflection. From a faculty perspective this is meant there was an increase of social network development and provided higher levels of social capital, especially for those transitioning into academia. The pandemic led to an increased reliance on reflection of virtual reflection, which may become the norm. Further research is required to explore the experiences and perceptions of reflection for this cohort of HE teachers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育学者利用教学广场进行跨学科反思:范围审查
数据来源对十(10)个电子数据库进行系统检索,并对参考文献列表进行人工检索,确定了 13 项研究供综述。综述方法如果对教学进行了反思,且涉及护理、助产、药学和生物医学等学科,则纳入研究。采用模式、进展、差距、实践和研究证据[PAGER]框架对数据进行了提取和制图,并进行了展示。这种技能的提高得益于通过跨学科观察、反思和其他偶然事件建立的积极学术关系。高校学者从这一过程中获得了积极的益处,尤其是那些刚刚过渡到学术界的学者。这些益处包括提高了对自身教学实践的认识,加深了对学生经历的理解,以及高等院校学者感觉自己不再孤立,对自己的教学更加放心。进行跨学科反思有助于发展社会资本,从而增强信心。这表现在,高校教师所在院系以外的网络机会增加,从而发展了新的专业关系。每种情况下的文化都对参与反思起到了阻碍或促进作用。我们还注意到进行反思的方式多种多样,并在 COVID-19 期间获得了新的见解。结论本范围审查探讨了目前已发表的关于护理、助产、药学和生物医学科学学科的高校学者进行教学反思的文献。跨学科利益相关者的主要成果是通过开展跨学科反思,提高了自信心,学习了新的教学方法,并深入了解了学生的体验。从教师的角度来看,这意味着社会网络的发展得到了加强,并提供了更高水平的社会资本,尤其是对那些转型进入学术界的教师而言。大流行病导致人们更加依赖虚拟反思,这可能会成为一种常态。还需要进一步开展研究,探索这批高校教师的反思经验和感悟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
The utility and feasibility of incorporating death cafes in undergraduate education: A qualitative exploration of medical and nursing students' perspectives The critical role of education in shaping nurses' attitudes and intentions towards neonatal palliative care: A network analysis Editorial Board Barriers and facilitators to the application of nurse practitioners' training pilot programs in China: A CFIR-guided descriptive qualitative study Perceptions of care homes as practice learning environments for pre-registration nursing students: A systematic-narrative hybrid literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1