Artificial intelligence for optimum tissue excision with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for flap reconstructions: Proof of concept

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY JPRAS Open Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2024.07.014
Ashokkumar Singaravelu , Jeffrey Dalli , Shirley Potter , Ronan A. Cahill
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for optimum tissue excision with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for flap reconstructions: Proof of concept","authors":"Ashokkumar Singaravelu ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Dalli ,&nbsp;Shirley Potter ,&nbsp;Ronan A. Cahill","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) is gaining popularity as an intraoperative tool to assess flap perfusion. However, it needs interpretation and there is concern regarding a potential for over-debridement with its use. Here we describe an artificial intelligence (AI) method that indicates the extent of flap trimming required.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Operative ICGFA recordings from ten consenting patients undergoing flap reconstruction without subsequent partial/total necrosis as part of an approved prospective study (NCT 04220242, Institutional Review Board Ref:1/378/2092), provided the training-testing datasets. Drawing from prior similar experience with ICGFA intestinal perfusion signal analysis, five fluorescence intensity and time-related features were analysed (MATLAB R2024a) from stabilised ICGFA imagery. Machine learning model training (with ten-fold cross-validation application) was grounded on the actual trimming by a consultant plastic surgeon (S.P.) experienced in ICGFA. MATLAB classification learner app was used to identify the most important feature and generate partial dependence plots for interpretability during training. Testing involved post-hoc application to unseen videos blinded to surgeon ICGFA interpretation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Training:testing datasets comprised 7:3 ICGFA videos with 28 and 3 sampled lines respectively. Validation and testing accuracy were 99.9 % and 99.3 % respectively. Maximum fluorescence intensity identified as the most important predictive curve feature. Partial dependence plotting revealed a threshold of 22.1 grayscale units and regions with maximum intensity less then threshold being more likely to be predicted as “excise”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AI method proved discriminative regarding indicating whether to retain or excise peripheral flap portions. Additional prospective patients and expert references are needed to validate generalisability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 389-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001165/pdfft?md5=bef7b13ed590fd480f311d2ba8ee6387&pid=1-s2.0-S2352587824001165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) is gaining popularity as an intraoperative tool to assess flap perfusion. However, it needs interpretation and there is concern regarding a potential for over-debridement with its use. Here we describe an artificial intelligence (AI) method that indicates the extent of flap trimming required.

Methods

Operative ICGFA recordings from ten consenting patients undergoing flap reconstruction without subsequent partial/total necrosis as part of an approved prospective study (NCT 04220242, Institutional Review Board Ref:1/378/2092), provided the training-testing datasets. Drawing from prior similar experience with ICGFA intestinal perfusion signal analysis, five fluorescence intensity and time-related features were analysed (MATLAB R2024a) from stabilised ICGFA imagery. Machine learning model training (with ten-fold cross-validation application) was grounded on the actual trimming by a consultant plastic surgeon (S.P.) experienced in ICGFA. MATLAB classification learner app was used to identify the most important feature and generate partial dependence plots for interpretability during training. Testing involved post-hoc application to unseen videos blinded to surgeon ICGFA interpretation.

Results

Training:testing datasets comprised 7:3 ICGFA videos with 28 and 3 sampled lines respectively. Validation and testing accuracy were 99.9 % and 99.3 % respectively. Maximum fluorescence intensity identified as the most important predictive curve feature. Partial dependence plotting revealed a threshold of 22.1 grayscale units and regions with maximum intensity less then threshold being more likely to be predicted as “excise”.

Conclusion

The AI method proved discriminative regarding indicating whether to retain or excise peripheral flap portions. Additional prospective patients and expert references are needed to validate generalisability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能通过吲哚青绿荧光血管造影技术实现皮瓣重建的最佳组织切除效果:概念验证
背景花青素绿荧光血管造影术(ICGFA)作为术中评估皮瓣灌注的工具越来越受欢迎。然而,它需要解释,而且人们担心使用它可能会造成过度剥离。方法作为一项已获批准的前瞻性研究(NCT 04220242,机构审查委员会编号:1/378/2092)的一部分,十名患者在同意的情况下接受了皮瓣重建手术,且随后没有发生部分/全部坏死,这些患者的 ICGFA 手术记录提供了训练测试数据集。借鉴之前 ICGFA 肠灌注信号分析的类似经验,对稳定的 ICGFA 图像进行了五种荧光强度和时间相关特征的分析(MATLAB R2024a)。机器学习模型的训练(十倍交叉验证应用)是以一位在 ICGFA 方面经验丰富的整形外科顾问(S.P.)的实际修剪为基础的。MATLAB 分类学习应用程序用于识别最重要的特征,并生成部分依赖图,以便在训练过程中进行解释。结果训练和测试数据集由 7:3 ICGFA 视频组成,分别有 28 条和 3 条采样线。验证和测试准确率分别为 99.9 % 和 99.3 %。最大荧光强度被确定为最重要的预测曲线特征。部分依存图显示阈值为 22.1 灰度单位,最大强度小于阈值的区域更有可能被预测为 "切除"。需要更多的前瞻性患者和专家参考来验证其通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JPRAS Open
JPRAS Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.
期刊最新文献
Anatomy and biomechanics of the scapholunate ligament in Vietnamese cadavers Rare presentation and resection of giant cell tumor invading the middle ear and skull base: A case report Orthoplastic surgery research: Three decades of growth and future directions Prevalence of Silicone Lymphadenopathy in Women with Breast Implants: A single-center retrospective study Microsurgery influences breast reconstruction and its timing in patients with breast cancer: A population-based multilevel analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1