Everyday Memory Disturbance in Primary Progressive Aphasia.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Neurology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1159/000540340
David Foxe, Gyan Ainkaran, James Carrick, Sau Chi Cheung, Rebekah M Ahmed, Manisha Narasimhan, James R Burrell, Yun Tae Hwang, Muireann Irish, Olivier Piguet
{"title":"Everyday Memory Disturbance in Primary Progressive Aphasia.","authors":"David Foxe, Gyan Ainkaran, James Carrick, Sau Chi Cheung, Rebekah M Ahmed, Manisha Narasimhan, James R Burrell, Yun Tae Hwang, Muireann Irish, Olivier Piguet","doi":"10.1159/000540340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mounting evidence indicates distinct memory profiles among the primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants. Neuropsychological tests reveal disproportionate memory impairments in the logopenic variant PPA (lv-PPA) relative to the non-fluent variant PPA (nfv-PPA) and semantic variant PPA (sv-PPA). The real-world experience of day-to-day memory disturbances in PPA, however, remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Everyday expressions of memory in 26 lv-PPA, 24 nfv-PPA, and 40 sv-PPA patients, and 70 healthy controls were examined using the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised (CBI-R) carer questionnaire. Kruskal-Wallis tests compared CBI-R Memory items (1-8) across groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the most discriminative items to distinguish lv-PPA from nfv-PPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, lv-PPA and sv-PPA patients were reported to experience more day-to-day memory issues (item 1), increased repetition of questions (2), forgetting the names of familiar people and objects (4, 5), and poor concentration (6). lv-PPA patients were also reported to exhibit more occurrences of losing or misplacing items (3) and forgetting the day (7). All PPA groups experienced more confusion in unfamiliar environments (8) than controls. Direct comparisons among PPA groups revealed distinct profiles, with lv-PPA and sv-PPA patients exhibiting more frequent forgetting of names and objects (3, 4) than nfv-PPA, and sv-PPA demonstrating greater day-to-day memory impairment (1), repeated questions (2), and poor concentration (6) compared to nfv-PPA. Forgetting the names of familiar objects (5) was the most sensitive and specific item to distinguish lv-PPA from nfv-PPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate distinct day-to-day memory profiles in PPA. Future research should explore the influence of language impairments on these profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"177-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mounting evidence indicates distinct memory profiles among the primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants. Neuropsychological tests reveal disproportionate memory impairments in the logopenic variant PPA (lv-PPA) relative to the non-fluent variant PPA (nfv-PPA) and semantic variant PPA (sv-PPA). The real-world experience of day-to-day memory disturbances in PPA, however, remains poorly understood.

Methods: Everyday expressions of memory in 26 lv-PPA, 24 nfv-PPA, and 40 sv-PPA patients, and 70 healthy controls were examined using the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised (CBI-R) carer questionnaire. Kruskal-Wallis tests compared CBI-R Memory items (1-8) across groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the most discriminative items to distinguish lv-PPA from nfv-PPA.

Results: Compared to controls, lv-PPA and sv-PPA patients were reported to experience more day-to-day memory issues (item 1), increased repetition of questions (2), forgetting the names of familiar people and objects (4, 5), and poor concentration (6). lv-PPA patients were also reported to exhibit more occurrences of losing or misplacing items (3) and forgetting the day (7). All PPA groups experienced more confusion in unfamiliar environments (8) than controls. Direct comparisons among PPA groups revealed distinct profiles, with lv-PPA and sv-PPA patients exhibiting more frequent forgetting of names and objects (3, 4) than nfv-PPA, and sv-PPA demonstrating greater day-to-day memory impairment (1), repeated questions (2), and poor concentration (6) compared to nfv-PPA. Forgetting the names of familiar objects (5) was the most sensitive and specific item to distinguish lv-PPA from nfv-PPA.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate distinct day-to-day memory profiles in PPA. Future research should explore the influence of language impairments on these profiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性进行性失语症的日常记忆障碍。
简介越来越多的证据表明,原发性进行性失语症(PPA)变体之间存在不同的记忆特征。神经心理学测试显示,相对于非流利型(nfv-PPA)和语义型(sv-PPA)变体,对数开放型变体(lv-PPA)的记忆障碍不成比例。然而,人们对 PPA 患者日常记忆障碍的真实体验仍然知之甚少:方法:使用《剑桥行为清单-修订版》(CBI-R)照护者问卷调查了 26 名语义型 PPA、24 名非语义型 PPA 和 40 名语义型 PPA 患者以及 70 名健康对照者的日常记忆表达。Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较了各组的 CBI-R 记忆项目(1-8)。接收者操作特征曲线评估了区分lv-PPA和nfv-PPA的最具区分性的项目:结果:与对照组相比,lv-PPA 和 sv-PPA 患者被报告有更多的日常记忆问题(第 1 项)、重复问题增多(第 2 项)、忘记熟悉的人和物的名称(第 4、5 项)以及注意力不集中(第 6 项)。据报告,Lv-PPA 患者还表现出更多丢失或放错物品(3)和忘记日期(7)的情况。与对照组相比,所有 PPA 组患者在陌生环境中都更容易感到困惑(8)。PPA 各组之间的直接比较显示出不同的特征,与 nfv-PPA 相比,lv-PPA 和 sv-PPA 患者遗忘姓名和物品的频率更高(3,4),而与 nfv-PPA 相比,sv-PPA 表现出更严重的日常记忆障碍(1)、重复问题(2)和注意力不集中(6)。忘记熟悉物体的名称(5)是区分lv-PPA和nfv-PPA最敏感、最特异的项目:我们的研究结果表明,PPA 患者的日常记忆特征各不相同。未来的研究应探讨语言障碍对这些特征的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting prehospital delay in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the Republic of Georgia: a country-wide, prospective study. Developing a Predictive Model for Ischemic Stroke Onset Time Using Transfer Learning. Association Between Internal Carotid Artery Tortuosity and Hemorrhagic Transformation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Digital Color Vision Testing Reveals Widespread Cone Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis Independent of Optic Neuritis. Acknowledgement to Reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1