A single-center pilot study on the efficacy and safety of acetic acid–enhanced magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for diagnosis of colorectal epithelial neoplasms

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.010
Takeshi Shimizu MD, Taku Yamagata MD, Yoshihide Kanno MD, Megumi Tanaka MD, Tomohiro Shimada MD, Daichi Komabayashi MD, Hiroki Sato MD, Yuta Shibuya MD, Kei Ito MD, PhD
{"title":"A single-center pilot study on the efficacy and safety of acetic acid–enhanced magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for diagnosis of colorectal epithelial neoplasms","authors":"Takeshi Shimizu MD,&nbsp;Taku Yamagata MD,&nbsp;Yoshihide Kanno MD,&nbsp;Megumi Tanaka MD,&nbsp;Tomohiro Shimada MD,&nbsp;Daichi Komabayashi MD,&nbsp;Hiroki Sato MD,&nbsp;Yuta Shibuya MD,&nbsp;Kei Ito MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>We investigated the ideal acetic acid (AA) concentration for AA-enhanced narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy (ANBI-ME) in the diagnosis of superficial colorectal neoplasms and evaluated its clinical efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>During the exploratory phase, we investigated 4 concentrations (1.5%, 2.25%, 3.0%, and 4.5%) in rotation by performing ANBI-ME on 50 superficial colorectal neoplasms at each concentration. A favorable AA concentration was determined by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy, AA whitening duration (AD), peristalsis, and bleeding after endoscopic resection. In the validation phase, we assessed interobserver agreements for ANBI-ME with the determined AA concentration and intermethodologic agreements between that and subsequently conducted crystal violet–stained magnifying endoscopy (CV-ME) with the exploratory set and 98 additional patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The diagnostic accuracies were 89.3% (42/47) for 1.5% AA, 92.0% (46/50) for 2.25% AA, 96.8% (61/63) for 3.0% AA, and 97.8% (46/47) for 4.5% AA, with no significant difference (<em>P</em> = .26). A significant positive correlation was observed between AA concentration and AD (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). No significant differences in hyperperistalsis or post-resection bleeding were observed. The optimal AA concentration was determined to be 4.5%. In the validation analysis, the accuracy rates were 72.4% (105/145) with the use of AMBI-ME and 68.3% (99/145) with the use of CV-ME (<em>P</em> = .43). Strong agreements were noted between observers (κ: 0.87 for ANBI-ME, 0.83 for CV-ME) and between the methods (κ: 0.87 and 0.81 for each observer).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For diagnosing colorectal lesions, an AA concentration of 4.5% in ANBI-ME was safe and effective. Its diagnostic performance was similar to CV-ME, and future large-sample studies may confirm its potential as a reliable alternative endoscopic diagnostic method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 2","pages":"Pages 416-424"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724034369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

We investigated the ideal acetic acid (AA) concentration for AA-enhanced narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy (ANBI-ME) in the diagnosis of superficial colorectal neoplasms and evaluated its clinical efficacy.

Methods

During the exploratory phase, we investigated 4 concentrations (1.5%, 2.25%, 3.0%, and 4.5%) in rotation by performing ANBI-ME on 50 superficial colorectal neoplasms at each concentration. A favorable AA concentration was determined by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy, AA whitening duration (AD), peristalsis, and bleeding after endoscopic resection. In the validation phase, we assessed interobserver agreements for ANBI-ME with the determined AA concentration and intermethodologic agreements between that and subsequently conducted crystal violet–stained magnifying endoscopy (CV-ME) with the exploratory set and 98 additional patients.

Results

The diagnostic accuracies were 89.3% (42/47) for 1.5% AA, 92.0% (46/50) for 2.25% AA, 96.8% (61/63) for 3.0% AA, and 97.8% (46/47) for 4.5% AA, with no significant difference (P = .26). A significant positive correlation was observed between AA concentration and AD (P < .001). No significant differences in hyperperistalsis or post-resection bleeding were observed. The optimal AA concentration was determined to be 4.5%. In the validation analysis, the accuracy rates were 72.4% (105/145) with the use of AMBI-ME and 68.3% (99/145) with the use of CV-ME (P = .43). Strong agreements were noted between observers (κ: 0.87 for ANBI-ME, 0.83 for CV-ME) and between the methods (κ: 0.87 and 0.81 for each observer).

Conclusions

For diagnosing colorectal lesions, an AA concentration of 4.5% in ANBI-ME was safe and effective. Its diagnostic performance was similar to CV-ME, and future large-sample studies may confirm its potential as a reliable alternative endoscopic diagnostic method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
醋酸增强放大内镜与窄带成像诊断结直肠上皮肿瘤的有效性和安全性的单中心试点研究。
背景和目的:我们研究了AA增强窄带成像(NBI)放大内镜(ANBI-ME)诊断浅表结直肠肿瘤的理想醋酸(AA)浓度,并评估了其临床疗效:在探索阶段,我们对四种浓度(1.5%、2.25%、3.0% 和 4.5%)进行了轮换研究,在每种浓度下对 50 例表浅大肠肿瘤进行了 ANBI-ME。通过评估诊断准确性、AA 增白持续时间(AD)、蠕动和内镜切除术后出血情况,确定有利的 AA 浓度。在验证阶段,我们评估了ANBI-ME与确定的AA浓度之间的观察者间一致性,以及与随后进行的水晶紫染色放大内镜检查(CV-ME)之间的方法间一致性:1.5% AA 的诊断准确率为 89.3%(42/47),2.25% 为 92.0%(46/50),3.0% 为 96.8%(61/63),4.5% 为 97.8%(46/47),无显著差异(p = 0.26)。AA 浓度与 ADs 之间存在明显的正相关性(p < 0.001)。在肠蠕动过快或切口后出血方面没有观察到明显差异。最佳 AA 浓度被确定为 4.5%。在验证分析中,使用 AMBI-ME 的准确率为 72.4%(105/145),使用 CV-ME 的准确率为 68.3%(99/145)(p = 0.43)。两名观察者之间(κ,ANBI-ME 为 0.87;CV-ME 为 0.83)以及两种方法之间(κ,每位观察者为 0.87 和 0.81)的准确率非常一致:结论:在诊断结直肠病变时,ANBI-ME 中 4.5% 的 AA 浓度是安全有效的。其诊断效果与 CV-ME 不相上下,未来的大样本研究可能会证实其作为可靠的替代内镜诊断方法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Erratum Contents Prospective randomized controlled trial of water exchange plus cap versus water exchange colonoscopy in unsedated veterans Boosting efficiency in the endoscopy suite: integrating team workflows improves productivity and minimizes cost Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and capsule endoscopy in patients with diabetes: a matched cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1