The impact of perioperative synbiotics treatment in living-donor liver transplantation after induction of early enteral nutrition.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02918-7
Shohei Yoshiya, Shinji Itoh, Takeo Toshima, Yuki Bekki, Takuma Izumi, Norifumi Iseda, Yuriko Tsutsui, Katsuya Toshida, Yuki Nakayama, Takuma Ishikawa, Tomoharu Yoshizumi
{"title":"The impact of perioperative synbiotics treatment in living-donor liver transplantation after induction of early enteral nutrition.","authors":"Shohei Yoshiya, Shinji Itoh, Takeo Toshima, Yuki Bekki, Takuma Izumi, Norifumi Iseda, Yuriko Tsutsui, Katsuya Toshida, Yuki Nakayama, Takuma Ishikawa, Tomoharu Yoshizumi","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02918-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Infectious complications, particularly post-transplant sepsis, have a critical impact on postoperative outcomes. This study examined the effects of perioperative synbiotic treatment on postoperative outcomes in patients receiving early enteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 210 living-donor liver transplantation procedures and retrospectively analyzed the postoperative outcomes with and without perioperative synbiotic treatment (live lactic acid bacteria, bifidobacteria, and oligosaccharides) 5 days before and after living-donor liver transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synbiotic group (n = 34) had significantly fewer male donors (38.2% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.011) and a higher proportion of ABO-incompatible grafts (52.9% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.021) than the non-synbiotic group (n = 176). The incidence of sepsis was significantly lower in the synbiotic group than in the non-synbiotic group (0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.029), with a lower incidence rate of sepsis due to bacteremia with intestinal bacteria (0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.089). There were no significant differences in the proportions of acute rejection, small-for-size graft syndrome, or postoperative liver function between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the graft survival rates after LDLT between two groups. (p = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative synbiotic treatment prevents post-transplant sepsis, even with early enteral nutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02918-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Infectious complications, particularly post-transplant sepsis, have a critical impact on postoperative outcomes. This study examined the effects of perioperative synbiotic treatment on postoperative outcomes in patients receiving early enteral nutrition.

Methods: We reviewed 210 living-donor liver transplantation procedures and retrospectively analyzed the postoperative outcomes with and without perioperative synbiotic treatment (live lactic acid bacteria, bifidobacteria, and oligosaccharides) 5 days before and after living-donor liver transplantation.

Results: The synbiotic group (n = 34) had significantly fewer male donors (38.2% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.011) and a higher proportion of ABO-incompatible grafts (52.9% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.021) than the non-synbiotic group (n = 176). The incidence of sepsis was significantly lower in the synbiotic group than in the non-synbiotic group (0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.029), with a lower incidence rate of sepsis due to bacteremia with intestinal bacteria (0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.089). There were no significant differences in the proportions of acute rejection, small-for-size graft syndrome, or postoperative liver function between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the graft survival rates after LDLT between two groups. (p = 0.24).

Conclusion: Perioperative synbiotic treatment prevents post-transplant sepsis, even with early enteral nutrition.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期肠内营养诱导后,活体肝移植围手术期合成益生菌治疗的影响。
目的:感染并发症,尤其是移植后败血症,对术后预后有着至关重要的影响。本研究探讨了围手术期合生元治疗对接受早期肠内营养患者术后效果的影响:我们回顾了 210 例活体肝移植手术,并回顾性分析了活体肝移植手术前后 5 天使用和未使用围手术期益生菌(活乳酸菌、双歧杆菌和低聚糖)治疗的术后效果:结果:与非同步生物组(n = 176)相比,同步生物组(n = 34)男性供体明显较少(38.2% vs. 61.9%,p = 0.011),ABO不相容移植物的比例也较高(52.9% vs. 25.6%,p = 0.021)。合成生化组的败血症发生率明显低于非合成生化组(0% vs. 7.4%,p = 0.029),其中肠道细菌引起的败血症发生率较低(0% vs. 4.6%,p = 0.089)。两组急性排斥反应、小尺寸移植物综合征或术后肝功能的比例无明显差异。此外,两组 LDLT 术后的移植物存活率也无明显差异(P = 0.24)。(P=0.24):结论:围手术期合生元治疗可预防移植后败血症,即使早期肠内营养也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Is the use of direct oral anticoagulants after non-cardiac thoracic surgery safe for patients? Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery. Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Development of a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy simulator: Sigmaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1