Surrogates of Endothelial Injury Predict Survival After Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.009
Anmol Baranwal, Kimberly J Langer, Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja, Ernesto Ayala, James Foran, Hemant Murthy, Vivek Roy, Madiha Iqbal, Jeanne Palmer, Lisa Z Sproat, Saurabh Chhabra, Nandita Khera, Urshila Durani, Mehrdad Hefazi, Abhishek Mangaonkar, Mithun V Shah, Mark R Litzow, William J Hogan, Hassan B Alkhateeb
{"title":"Surrogates of Endothelial Injury Predict Survival After Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide.","authors":"Anmol Baranwal, Kimberly J Langer, Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja, Ernesto Ayala, James Foran, Hemant Murthy, Vivek Roy, Madiha Iqbal, Jeanne Palmer, Lisa Z Sproat, Saurabh Chhabra, Nandita Khera, Urshila Durani, Mehrdad Hefazi, Abhishek Mangaonkar, Mithun V Shah, Mark R Litzow, William J Hogan, Hassan B Alkhateeb","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is becoming the standard of care for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT). Cyclophosphamide is associated with endothelial injury. We hypothesized that the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) score, being a marker of endothelial dysfunction, will predict non-relapse mortality (NRM) in alloHCT patients receiving PT-Cy for GVHD prophylaxis. We evaluate the prognostic ability of the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and EASIX scores, and report other factors influencing survival, in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing alloHCT and receiving PT-Cy-based GVHD prophylaxis. Adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent alloHCT and received PT-Cy for GVHD prophylaxis at the three Mayo Clinic locations were included in this study. We retrospectively reviewed the Mayo Clinic database and the available electronic medical records to determine the patient, disease, and transplant characteristics. An HCT-CI score of ≥3 was considered high. The EASIX score was calculated from labs available between day -28 (of alloHCT) to the day of starting conditioning and analyzed on log2 transformed values. A log2-EASIX score ≥2.32 was considered high. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis, with relapse considered as competing risk. Overall survival (OS) from transplant was determined using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Cox-proportional hazard method was used to evaluate factors impacting survival. A total of 199 patients were evaluated. Patients with a high log2-EASIX score had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year after alloHCT (34.5% versus 12.3%, P = .003). Competing risk analysis showed that a high log2-EASIX score (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.38 to 6.17, P = .005) and pre-alloHCT hypertension (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.36, P = .034) were independently predictive of 1 year-NRM. Accordingly, we combined the two factors to develop a composite risk model stratifying patients in low, intermediate, and high-risk groups: 111 (55.8%) patients were considered low-risk, 76 (38.2%) were intermediate and 12 (6%) were high-risk. Compared to patients in the low-risk group, the intermediate (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.33, P = .005) and high-risk (HR 5.77, 95% CI 2.31 to 14.39, P < .001) groups were associated with a significantly inferior 1-year OS. Multiorgan failure (MOF) was among the common causes of NRM (14/32, 43.8%) particularly among patients with prior pulmonary comorbidities [7 (50%) patients]. Our study shows that EASIX score is predictive of survival after PT-Cy. The novel EASIX-HTN composite risk model may stratify patients prior to transplant. MOF is a common cause of NRM in patients receiving PT-Cy, particularly among patients with pulmonary comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is becoming the standard of care for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT). Cyclophosphamide is associated with endothelial injury. We hypothesized that the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) score, being a marker of endothelial dysfunction, will predict non-relapse mortality (NRM) in alloHCT patients receiving PT-Cy for GVHD prophylaxis. We evaluate the prognostic ability of the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and EASIX scores, and report other factors influencing survival, in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing alloHCT and receiving PT-Cy-based GVHD prophylaxis. Adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent alloHCT and received PT-Cy for GVHD prophylaxis at the three Mayo Clinic locations were included in this study. We retrospectively reviewed the Mayo Clinic database and the available electronic medical records to determine the patient, disease, and transplant characteristics. An HCT-CI score of ≥3 was considered high. The EASIX score was calculated from labs available between day -28 (of alloHCT) to the day of starting conditioning and analyzed on log2 transformed values. A log2-EASIX score ≥2.32 was considered high. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis, with relapse considered as competing risk. Overall survival (OS) from transplant was determined using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Cox-proportional hazard method was used to evaluate factors impacting survival. A total of 199 patients were evaluated. Patients with a high log2-EASIX score had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year after alloHCT (34.5% versus 12.3%, P = .003). Competing risk analysis showed that a high log2-EASIX score (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.38 to 6.17, P = .005) and pre-alloHCT hypertension (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.36, P = .034) were independently predictive of 1 year-NRM. Accordingly, we combined the two factors to develop a composite risk model stratifying patients in low, intermediate, and high-risk groups: 111 (55.8%) patients were considered low-risk, 76 (38.2%) were intermediate and 12 (6%) were high-risk. Compared to patients in the low-risk group, the intermediate (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.33, P = .005) and high-risk (HR 5.77, 95% CI 2.31 to 14.39, P < .001) groups were associated with a significantly inferior 1-year OS. Multiorgan failure (MOF) was among the common causes of NRM (14/32, 43.8%) particularly among patients with prior pulmonary comorbidities [7 (50%) patients]. Our study shows that EASIX score is predictive of survival after PT-Cy. The novel EASIX-HTN composite risk model may stratify patients prior to transplant. MOF is a common cause of NRM in patients receiving PT-Cy, particularly among patients with pulmonary comorbidities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内皮损伤的替代物可预测移植后环磷酰胺的存活率。
背景:移植后环磷酰胺(PT-Cy)正成为异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHCT)后预防移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)的标准疗法。环磷酰胺与内皮损伤有关。我们假设,内皮活化和应激指数(EASIX)评分作为内皮功能障碍的标志,将预测接受PT-Cy预防GVHD的异体干细胞移植患者的非复发死亡率(NRM):我们评估了HCT-CI和EASIX评分的预后能力,并报告了影响接受异体HCT并接受PT-Cy预防GVHD的血液恶性肿瘤患者生存的其他因素:本研究纳入了在梅奥诊所三处接受alloHCT并接受PT-Cy预防GVHD的成年血液恶性肿瘤患者。我们回顾性地查看了梅奥诊所的数据库和现有的电子病历,以确定患者、疾病和移植的特征。HCT-CI评分≥3分为高分。EASIX评分是根据第-28天(同种异体血细胞移植)至开始调理当天的化验结果计算得出的,并按对数2转换值进行分析。log2-EASIX 评分≥ 2.32 为高分。采用竞争风险分析法确定NRM的累积发生率,复发被视为竞争风险。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和对数秩方法确定移植后的总生存期(OS)。Cox比例危险法用于评估影响存活率的因素:共评估了 199 名患者。对数2-EASIX评分高的患者在异体器官移植后1年的NRM累积发生率明显更高(34.5% vs. 12.3%,P = 0.003)。竞争风险分析表明,高 log2-EASIX 评分(HR 2.92,95% CI 1.38 - 6.17,P = 0.005)和异体HCT 前高血压(HR 2.15,95% CI 1.06 - 4.36,P = 0.034)可独立预测 1 年的 NRM。因此,我们将这两个因素结合起来,建立了一个复合风险模型,将患者分为低、中、高风险组:111 例(55.8%)患者被视为低风险,76 例(38.2%)为中度风险,12 例(6%)为高度风险。与低风险组患者相比,中度风险组(HR 2.38,95% CI 1.31 - 4.33,P = 0.005)和高度风险组(HR 5.77,95% CI 2.31 - 14.39,P < 0.001)的1年OS明显较低。多器官功能衰竭(MOF)是NRM的常见原因之一(14/32,43.8%),尤其是在既往有肺部合并症的患者中(7例(50%)):我们的研究表明,EASIX 评分可预测 PT-Cy 治疗后的生存率。结论:我们的研究表明,EASIX评分可预测PT-Cy后的生存率,新型EASIX-HTN复合风险模型可在移植前对患者进行分层。在接受 PT-Cy 的患者中,MOF 是导致 NRM 的常见原因,尤其是在有肺部合并症的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Advanced Practice Providers in Cellular Therapy: survey results from the ASTCT APP Special Interest Group exploring clinical roles, compensation and job satisfaction. Healthcare resource utilization and associated costs in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in England: HCRU and associated costs in patients with cGvHD in England. Superior survival after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with low-dose ATG compared to low-dose TBI in myeloablative fludarabine/busulfan-based regimen for MDS on behalf of the adult MDS Working Group of the JSTCT. N-803, an IL-15 superagonist complex as maintenance therapy after allogeneic donor stem cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome; a Phase 2 trial. Biologically Randomized Comparison of Haploidentical Versus Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Related Donor Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1