Evaluation of the Effect of Embryo Transfer Methods on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Study and Future Perspectives.

Samira Azimi, Shahrzad Zadeh Modarres, Mahsa Esgandari, Saba Abdollahzadeh Fahimi, Ramina Fazeli
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effect of Embryo Transfer Methods on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Study and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Samira Azimi, Shahrzad Zadeh Modarres, Mahsa Esgandari, Saba Abdollahzadeh Fahimi, Ramina Fazeli","doi":"10.18502/jri.v25i2.16008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) are used for embryo transfer. However, few studies were conducted to compare the methods and assess their effect on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Mahdieh Hospital in Tehran, analyzing 506 ICSI cycles with fresh embryo transfer. The study period was from April 2019 to March 2022. Following the evaluation of patients' profile, they were divided into two groups of TAUS (n=250) and TVUS (n=256). The pregnancy outcomes included positive test of β-HCG, history of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy (EP), clinical pregnancy, and the duration of the embryo transfer were compared between two groups. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of chemical and clinical pregnancy in the TAUS group was higher compared to the TVUS group, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The rate of live term birth and live preterm birth was higher in the TAUS group compared to the TVUS group, though the difference was insignificant. Moreover, EP and abortion rates were higher in TVUS group compared to the TAUS group, but the differences were not statistically significant. The odds ratio of achieving pregnancy was higher with TAUS compared to TVUS, but this was only statistically significant for the age variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of TAUS method appears to be associated with improved pregnancy outcome, including higher rates of chemical and clinical pregnancy, compared to TVUS. Yet, further research is needed to confirm these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":38826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","volume":"25 2","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11327424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v25i2.16008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) are used for embryo transfer. However, few studies were conducted to compare the methods and assess their effect on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Mahdieh Hospital in Tehran, analyzing 506 ICSI cycles with fresh embryo transfer. The study period was from April 2019 to March 2022. Following the evaluation of patients' profile, they were divided into two groups of TAUS (n=250) and TVUS (n=256). The pregnancy outcomes included positive test of β-HCG, history of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy (EP), clinical pregnancy, and the duration of the embryo transfer were compared between two groups. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression were used for data analysis.

Results: The rate of chemical and clinical pregnancy in the TAUS group was higher compared to the TVUS group, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The rate of live term birth and live preterm birth was higher in the TAUS group compared to the TVUS group, though the difference was insignificant. Moreover, EP and abortion rates were higher in TVUS group compared to the TAUS group, but the differences were not statistically significant. The odds ratio of achieving pregnancy was higher with TAUS compared to TVUS, but this was only statistically significant for the age variable.

Conclusion: The use of TAUS method appears to be associated with improved pregnancy outcome, including higher rates of chemical and clinical pregnancy, compared to TVUS. Yet, further research is needed to confirm these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估胚胎移植方法对妊娠结果的影响:回顾性研究与未来展望。
背景:经腹部超声(TAUS)和经阴道超声(TVUS)被用于胚胎移植。然而,很少有研究对这两种方法进行比较,并评估它们对妊娠结果的影响:德黑兰 Mahdieh 医院开展了一项回顾性队列研究,分析了 506 个采用新鲜胚胎移植的 ICSI 周期。研究时间为 2019 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月。在对患者的资料进行评估后,他们被分为 TAUS(250 人)和 TVUS(256 人)两组。比较两组患者的妊娠结局,包括β-HCG阳性、流产史、异位妊娠(EP)、临床妊娠和胚胎移植时间。数据分析采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、Pearson Chi-Square 检验、Fisher's 精确检验和 Logistic 回归:结果:TAUS 组的化学妊娠率和临床妊娠率均高于 TVUS 组,差异有统计学意义(p):与 TVUS 相比,使用 TAUS 方法似乎与妊娠结局的改善有关,包括更高的化学妊娠率和临床妊娠率。然而,还需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并阐明其背后的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
A Bizarre Case of Periovarian Hematoma in a Patient Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Managed Conservatively. Abandoned Cryopreserved Embryos: The Unresolved Challenge. Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles on Sperm Parameters in Fresh and Frozen Samples. Comparison of the Effect of Fenugreek and Metformin on Clinical and Metabolic Status of Cases with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Trial. Evaluation of the Effect of Embryo Transfer Methods on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Study and Future Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1