A comparison of simplified or conventional antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure in patients at high bleeding risk: the PLATEBRISK study.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Eurointervention Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00116
Pablo Antúnez-Muiños, Sergio López-Tejero, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Matias Mon-Noboa, Juan M Ruiz-Nodar, Luis Andrés-Lalaguna, Fernando Rivero, Juan Gabriel Córdoba-Soriano, Ignacio J Amat-Santos, Berenice Caneiro-Queija, David Martí Sánchez, Javier Jimeno Sánchez, Fernando Torres Mezcua, Fabián Blanco-Fernández, Jorge Sanz Sánchez, Cristina Moreno-Ambroj, Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro, Luis Nombela-Franco, Xavier Freixa-Rofastes, Ignacio Cruz-González
{"title":"A comparison of simplified or conventional antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure in patients at high bleeding risk: the PLATEBRISK study.","authors":"Pablo Antúnez-Muiños, Sergio López-Tejero, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Matias Mon-Noboa, Juan M Ruiz-Nodar, Luis Andrés-Lalaguna, Fernando Rivero, Juan Gabriel Córdoba-Soriano, Ignacio J Amat-Santos, Berenice Caneiro-Queija, David Martí Sánchez, Javier Jimeno Sánchez, Fernando Torres Mezcua, Fabián Blanco-Fernández, Jorge Sanz Sánchez, Cristina Moreno-Ambroj, Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro, Luis Nombela-Franco, Xavier Freixa-Rofastes, Ignacio Cruz-González","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antithrombotic treatment (ATT) post-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains controversial. Furthermore, most of the patients undergoing LAAO are at a very high bleeding risk.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare a simplified versus conventional ATT after LAAO in very high bleeding risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre, retrospective study including very high bleeding risk patients, according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition, who underwent LAAO. These included patients at >4% risk of BARC 3 to 5 bleeding or >1% risk of intracranial bleeding after the procedure. Two groups were established based on the discharge ATT. The simplified group included single antiplatelet treatment or no treatment, and the conventional group comprised dual antiplatelet treatment or anticoagulation (combined or not with antiplatelet therapy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,135 patients were included. The mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.5±1.5 and 3.7±1.0, respectively. There were no differences in the composite endpoint (death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, device-related thrombus or major bleeding) between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.11; p=0.188). Although the rate of major bleeding during the first year was numerically lower in the simplified group, it did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; p=0.104). Nonetheless, patients with previous major bleeding presented a significantly lower rate of major bleeding when using the simplified treatment (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36-0.99; p=0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with very high bleeding risk, a simplified ATT after LAAO seems to be as effective as conventional protocols. Furthermore, patients with a history of major bleeding experienced a lower risk of major bleeding with the simplified ATT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"20 16","pages":"1018-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic treatment (ATT) post-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains controversial. Furthermore, most of the patients undergoing LAAO are at a very high bleeding risk.

Aims: This study aimed to compare a simplified versus conventional ATT after LAAO in very high bleeding risk patients.

Methods: This is a multicentre, retrospective study including very high bleeding risk patients, according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition, who underwent LAAO. These included patients at >4% risk of BARC 3 to 5 bleeding or >1% risk of intracranial bleeding after the procedure. Two groups were established based on the discharge ATT. The simplified group included single antiplatelet treatment or no treatment, and the conventional group comprised dual antiplatelet treatment or anticoagulation (combined or not with antiplatelet therapy).

Results: A total of 1,135 patients were included. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.5±1.5 and 3.7±1.0, respectively. There were no differences in the composite endpoint (death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, device-related thrombus or major bleeding) between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.11; p=0.188). Although the rate of major bleeding during the first year was numerically lower in the simplified group, it did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; p=0.104). Nonetheless, patients with previous major bleeding presented a significantly lower rate of major bleeding when using the simplified treatment (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36-0.99; p=0.049).

Conclusions: In patients with very high bleeding risk, a simplified ATT after LAAO seems to be as effective as conventional protocols. Furthermore, patients with a history of major bleeding experienced a lower risk of major bleeding with the simplified ATT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高出血风险患者左心房阑尾关闭术后简化或常规抗血栓治疗方案的比较:PLATEBRISK 研究。
背景:左心房阑尾闭塞术(LAAO)后的抗血栓治疗(ATT)仍存在争议。此外,大多数接受 LAAO 的患者都有极高的出血风险。目的:本研究旨在比较极高出血风险患者 LAAO 后的简化 ATT 与常规 ATT:这是一项多中心回顾性研究,研究对象包括根据出血学术研究联盟(BARC)的定义接受LAAO手术的出血风险极高的患者。其中包括 BARC 3 至 5 级出血风险大于 4% 或术后颅内出血风险大于 1% 的患者。根据出院时的 ATT 将患者分为两组。简化组包括单一抗血小板治疗或不治疗,常规组包括双重抗血小板治疗或抗凝治疗(联合或不联合抗血小板治疗):结果:共纳入 1 135 名患者。平均 CHA2DS2-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 评分分别为 4.5±1.5 和 3.7±1.0。两组患者的复合终点(死亡、中风、短暂性脑缺血发作、装置相关血栓或大出血)无差异(危险比 [HR] 0.81,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.59-1.11;P=0.188)。虽然简化组患者第一年的大出血率在数字上较低,但并没有统计学意义(HR 0.67,95% 置信区间:0.41-1.10;P=0.104)。然而,既往有大出血病史的患者在使用简化治疗后,大出血的发生率明显降低(HR 0.61,95% CI:0.36-0.99;P=0.049):对于出血风险极高的患者,LAAO 后的简化 ATT 似乎与传统方案一样有效。此外,有大出血病史的患者使用简化 ATT 后大出血的风险更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis. TAVI with the ACURATE neo2 in severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: the Neo2 BAV Registry. Development and validation of the D-PACE scoring system to predict delayed high-grade conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Feasibility of redo-TAVI in the self-expanding ACURATE neo2 valve: a computed tomography study. Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1