Lateral conflict resolution data derived from Argoverse-2: Analysing safety and efficiency impacts of autonomous vehicles at intersections

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104802
{"title":"Lateral conflict resolution data derived from Argoverse-2: Analysing safety and efficiency impacts of autonomous vehicles at intersections","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increased deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in mixed traffic flow, ensuring safe and efficient interactions between AVs and human road users is important. In urban environments, intersections have various conflicts that can greatly affect driving safety and traffic efficiency. This study uses road test data to examine the possible safety and efficiency impacts of intersection conflict resolution involving AVs. The contribution comprises two main aspects. Firstly. we prepare and open a high-quality lateral conflict resolution dataset derived from the Argoverse-2 data, specifically targeting urban intersections. A rigorous data processing pipeline is applied to extract pertinent scenarios, rectify anomalies, enhance data quality, and annotate conflict regimes. This effort yields 5000+ AV-involved and 16000 AV-free cases, covering rich conflict regimes and balanced traffic states. Secondly, we employ surrogate safety measures to assess the safety impact of AVs on human-driven vehicles (HVs) and pedestrians. In addition, a novel concept of Minimum Recurrent Clearance Time (MRCT) is proposed to quantify the traffic efficiency impacts of AVs during conflict resolution. The results show that, for AV–HV and HV–HV conflict resolution processes, the differences in selected safety and efficiency measures for human drivers are statistically insignificant. In contrast, pedestrians demonstrate diverse behaviour adjustments. Some pedestrians behave more conservatively when interacting with AVs than with HVs. Notably, the efficiency of AV-involved conflict resolution is significantly lower than in AV-free instances due to the conservative driving style of AVs. This efficiency gap is particularly large when AVs pass through the conflict point after human drivers in unprotected left turns. These observations offer a perspective on how AVs potentially affect the safety and efficiency of mixed traffic. The processed dataset is openly available via <span><span>https://github.com/RomainLITUD/conflict_resolution_dataset</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003231/pdfft?md5=36afa5b8da2e246f19bba4039b7a316b&pid=1-s2.0-S0968090X24003231-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003231","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increased deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in mixed traffic flow, ensuring safe and efficient interactions between AVs and human road users is important. In urban environments, intersections have various conflicts that can greatly affect driving safety and traffic efficiency. This study uses road test data to examine the possible safety and efficiency impacts of intersection conflict resolution involving AVs. The contribution comprises two main aspects. Firstly. we prepare and open a high-quality lateral conflict resolution dataset derived from the Argoverse-2 data, specifically targeting urban intersections. A rigorous data processing pipeline is applied to extract pertinent scenarios, rectify anomalies, enhance data quality, and annotate conflict regimes. This effort yields 5000+ AV-involved and 16000 AV-free cases, covering rich conflict regimes and balanced traffic states. Secondly, we employ surrogate safety measures to assess the safety impact of AVs on human-driven vehicles (HVs) and pedestrians. In addition, a novel concept of Minimum Recurrent Clearance Time (MRCT) is proposed to quantify the traffic efficiency impacts of AVs during conflict resolution. The results show that, for AV–HV and HV–HV conflict resolution processes, the differences in selected safety and efficiency measures for human drivers are statistically insignificant. In contrast, pedestrians demonstrate diverse behaviour adjustments. Some pedestrians behave more conservatively when interacting with AVs than with HVs. Notably, the efficiency of AV-involved conflict resolution is significantly lower than in AV-free instances due to the conservative driving style of AVs. This efficiency gap is particularly large when AVs pass through the conflict point after human drivers in unprotected left turns. These observations offer a perspective on how AVs potentially affect the safety and efficiency of mixed traffic. The processed dataset is openly available via https://github.com/RomainLITUD/conflict_resolution_dataset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自 Argoverse-2 的侧向冲突解决数据:分析自动驾驶汽车在交叉路口的安全和效率影响
随着自动驾驶汽车(AV)在混合交通流中的部署越来越多,确保自动驾驶汽车与人类道路使用者之间安全、高效的互动非常重要。在城市环境中,交叉路口存在各种冲突,会对驾驶安全和交通效率产生很大影响。本研究利用道路测试数据,研究了涉及自动驾驶汽车的交叉路口冲突解决可能对安全和效率产生的影响。其贡献主要包括两个方面。首先,我们准备并开放了源自 Argoverse-2 数据的高质量横向冲突解决数据集,特别针对城市交叉路口。我们采用严格的数据处理流程来提取相关场景、纠正异常、提高数据质量并注释冲突机制。这项工作产生了 5000 多个有视像设备参与的案例和 16000 个无视像设备的案例,涵盖了丰富的冲突机制和平衡的交通状态。其次,我们采用替代安全措施来评估自动驾驶汽车对人类驾驶车辆(HV)和行人的安全影响。此外,我们还提出了一个新概念,即 "最短重复通畅时间"(MRCT),以量化自动驾驶汽车在解决冲突过程中对交通效率的影响。研究结果表明,在 AV-HV 和 HV-HV 冲突解决过程中,人类驾驶员在所选安全和效率指标上的差异在统计学上并不显著。相比之下,行人则表现出不同的行为调整。一些行人在与自动驾驶汽车互动时比与自动驾驶汽车互动时表现得更为保守。值得注意的是,由于自动驾驶汽车的保守驾驶风格,有自动驾驶汽车参与的冲突解决效率明显低于无自动驾驶汽车的情况。当自动驾驶汽车在人类驾驶员无保护左转后通过冲突点时,这种效率差距尤为明显。这些观察结果提供了一个视角,让我们了解自动驾驶汽车如何潜在地影响混合交通的安全和效率。处理后的数据集可通过 https://github.com/RomainLITUD/conflict_resolution_dataset 公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
An environmentally-aware dynamic planning of electric vehicles for aircraft towing considering stochastic aircraft arrival and departure times Network-wide speed–flow estimation considering uncertain traffic conditions and sparse multi-type detectors: A KL divergence-based optimization approach Revealing the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on intercity truck transport: New insights from big data analytics MATNEC: AIS data-driven environment-adaptive maritime traffic network construction for realistic route generation A qualitative AI security risk assessment of autonomous vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1