Measurement invariance of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) across ethnicity, age, and sex among youth with depression

Ticiane Silva , Samuel D. Spencer , Miranda Higham , Ace A. Castillo , Abu Minhajuddin , April Gorman , Lynnel C. Goodman , Caitlin M. Pinciotti , Stephanie Hernandez , Holli Slater , Cesar A. Soutullo , John M. Hettema , Nisha A. Azhar , Wayne K. Goodman , Maduhkar H. Trivedi , Eric A. Storch
{"title":"Measurement invariance of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) across ethnicity, age, and sex among youth with depression","authors":"Ticiane Silva ,&nbsp;Samuel D. Spencer ,&nbsp;Miranda Higham ,&nbsp;Ace A. Castillo ,&nbsp;Abu Minhajuddin ,&nbsp;April Gorman ,&nbsp;Lynnel C. Goodman ,&nbsp;Caitlin M. Pinciotti ,&nbsp;Stephanie Hernandez ,&nbsp;Holli Slater ,&nbsp;Cesar A. Soutullo ,&nbsp;John M. Hettema ,&nbsp;Nisha A. Azhar ,&nbsp;Wayne K. Goodman ,&nbsp;Maduhkar H. Trivedi ,&nbsp;Eric A. Storch","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>We examined measurement invariance of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) across ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White), age (8–12 vs. 13–18 years-old), and sex-at-birth (male vs. female) groups.</p></div><div><h3>Design/methods</h3><p>Using a sample of 975 youth with depression (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 15.5) from the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multi-group-CFA (MG-CFA) were employed to assess the factor structure of the SCARED across demographic groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With the entire sample, a five-factor model demonstrated adequate fit. Evidence of measurement invariance across ethnicity, age, and sex groups was provided via MG-CFAs, which indicated no appreciable deterioration in model fit as varying levels of constraints (configural, metric, and scalar) were implemented. Factor loadings exceeded 0.5 within groups in MG-CFA models, suggesting consistent psychometric performance across groups. Mean group comparisons indicated females endorsed greater anxiety across subscales, younger children endorsed higher levels of separation anxiety, older children endorsed greater generalized anxiety, and scores were mostly equivalent across ethnicity groupings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While marginal model fit qualifies conclusions, our findings concerning measurement invariance of the SCARED across various demographic groups provide further support for the use of this measure in diverse contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

We examined measurement invariance of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) across ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White), age (8–12 vs. 13–18 years-old), and sex-at-birth (male vs. female) groups.

Design/methods

Using a sample of 975 youth with depression (Mage = 15.5) from the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multi-group-CFA (MG-CFA) were employed to assess the factor structure of the SCARED across demographic groups.

Results

With the entire sample, a five-factor model demonstrated adequate fit. Evidence of measurement invariance across ethnicity, age, and sex groups was provided via MG-CFAs, which indicated no appreciable deterioration in model fit as varying levels of constraints (configural, metric, and scalar) were implemented. Factor loadings exceeded 0.5 within groups in MG-CFA models, suggesting consistent psychometric performance across groups. Mean group comparisons indicated females endorsed greater anxiety across subscales, younger children endorsed higher levels of separation anxiety, older children endorsed greater generalized anxiety, and scores were mostly equivalent across ethnicity groupings.

Conclusion

While marginal model fit qualifies conclusions, our findings concerning measurement invariance of the SCARED across various demographic groups provide further support for the use of this measure in diverse contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查 (SCARED) 在不同种族、年龄和性别抑郁症青少年中的测量不变性
背景和目的我们研究了儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查(SCARED)在不同种族(西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人)、年龄(8-12 岁与 13-18 岁)和出生性别(男性与女性)群体之间的测量不变性。结果在整个样本中,五因素模型显示出充分的拟合度。MG-CFA提供了跨种族、年龄和性别组测量不变性的证据,表明在实施不同程度的约束(配置、度量和标度)时,模型拟合度没有明显下降。在 MG-CFA 模型中,各组内的因子载荷超过 0.5,这表明各组的心理测量表现一致。平均组别比较表明,女性对各分量表的焦虑程度较高,年龄较小的儿童对分离焦虑程度较高,年龄较大的儿童对广泛焦虑程度较高,不同种族组别的得分基本相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1