White matter structure and derived network properties are used to predict the progression from mild cognitive impairment of older adults to Alzheimer's disease.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05293-7
Jiaxuan Peng, Guangying Zheng, Mengmeng Hu, Zihan Zhang, Zhongyu Yuan, Yuyun Xu, Yuan Shao, Yang Zhang, Xiaojun Sun, Lu Han, Xiaokai Gu, Zhenyu Shu
{"title":"White matter structure and derived network properties are used to predict the progression from mild cognitive impairment of older adults to Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Jiaxuan Peng, Guangying Zheng, Mengmeng Hu, Zihan Zhang, Zhongyu Yuan, Yuyun Xu, Yuan Shao, Yang Zhang, Xiaojun Sun, Lu Han, Xiaokai Gu, Zhenyu Shu","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05293-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify white matter fiber injury and network changes that may lead to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression, then a joint model was constructed based on neuropsychological scales to predict high-risk individuals for Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression among older adults with MCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 173 MCI patients were included from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative(ADNI) database and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts. Forty-five progressed to AD during a 4-year follow-up period. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques extracted relevant DTI quantitative features for each patient. In addition, brain networks were constructed based on white matter fiber bundles to extract network property features. Ensemble dimensionality reduction was applied to reduce both DTI quantitative features and network features from the training cohort, and machine learning algorithms were added to construct white matter signature. In addition, 52 patients from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database were used for external validation of white matter signature. A joint model was subsequently generated by combining with scale scores, and its performance was evaluated using data from the testing cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on multivariate logistic regression, clinical dementia rating and Alzheimer's disease assessment scales (CDRS and ADAS, respectively) were selected as independent predictive factors. A joint model was constructed in combination with the white matter signature. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the training cohort were 0.938, 0.937, and 0.91, respectively, and the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the test cohort were 0.905, 0.923, and 0.872, respectively. The Delong test showed a statistically significant difference between the joint model and CDRS or ADAS scores (P < 0.05), yet no significant difference between the joint model and the white matter signature (P = 0.341).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present results demonstrate that a joint model combining neuropsychological scales can be constructed by using machine learning and DTI technology to identify MCI patients who are at high-risk of progressing to AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05293-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify white matter fiber injury and network changes that may lead to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression, then a joint model was constructed based on neuropsychological scales to predict high-risk individuals for Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression among older adults with MCI.

Methods: A total of 173 MCI patients were included from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative(ADNI) database and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts. Forty-five progressed to AD during a 4-year follow-up period. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques extracted relevant DTI quantitative features for each patient. In addition, brain networks were constructed based on white matter fiber bundles to extract network property features. Ensemble dimensionality reduction was applied to reduce both DTI quantitative features and network features from the training cohort, and machine learning algorithms were added to construct white matter signature. In addition, 52 patients from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database were used for external validation of white matter signature. A joint model was subsequently generated by combining with scale scores, and its performance was evaluated using data from the testing cohort.

Results: Based on multivariate logistic regression, clinical dementia rating and Alzheimer's disease assessment scales (CDRS and ADAS, respectively) were selected as independent predictive factors. A joint model was constructed in combination with the white matter signature. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the training cohort were 0.938, 0.937, and 0.91, respectively, and the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the test cohort were 0.905, 0.923, and 0.872, respectively. The Delong test showed a statistically significant difference between the joint model and CDRS or ADAS scores (P < 0.05), yet no significant difference between the joint model and the white matter signature (P = 0.341).

Conclusion: The present results demonstrate that a joint model combining neuropsychological scales can be constructed by using machine learning and DTI technology to identify MCI patients who are at high-risk of progressing to AD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白质结构和衍生网络特性用于预测老年人从轻度认知障碍到阿尔茨海默病的进展。
目的确定可能导致轻度认知障碍(MCI)进展的白质纤维损伤和网络变化,然后根据神经心理学量表构建联合模型,预测MCI老年人中阿尔茨海默病(AD)进展的高危人群:从阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)数据库中纳入了173名MCI患者,并将他们随机分为训练组和测试组。在为期4年的随访期间,有45名患者发展为AD。扩散张量成像(DTI)技术提取了每位患者的相关DTI定量特征。此外,还根据白质纤维束构建了大脑网络,以提取网络属性特征。采用集合降维法减少训练队列中的 DTI 定量特征和网络特征,并添加机器学习算法来构建白质特征。此外,国家阿尔茨海默氏症协调中心(NACC)数据库中的 52 名患者也被用于白质特征的外部验证。随后,结合量表评分生成了联合模型,并使用测试队列的数据对其性能进行了评估:结果:基于多变量逻辑回归,临床痴呆评分和阿尔茨海默病评估量表(分别为 CDRS 和 ADAS)被选为独立的预测因素。结合白质特征构建了一个联合模型。训练队列的AUC、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.938、0.937和0.91,测试队列的AUC、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.905、0.923和0.872。德隆检验显示,联合模型与 CDRS 或 ADAS 评分之间存在显著的统计学差异(P 结论:联合模型与 CDRS 或 ADAS 评分之间存在显著的统计学差异:本研究结果表明,通过使用机器学习和 DTI 技术,可以构建一个结合神经心理学量表的联合模型,以识别具有向 AD 发展的高风险的 MCI 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with the occupational balance in caregivers of people with dementia: A cross-sectional study from the ATENEA project. Mazor X robot-assisted upper and lower cervical pedicle screw fixation: a case report and literature review. Sociodemographic and health disparities in self-care difficulties among older individuals: Evidence from South Africa. Association of cognitive performance with overall, dosage, intensity, and domain physical activity in aging: NHANES 2011-2014. Validity and reliability of the TechPH scale in assessing Iranian older adults' attitudes toward technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1