Comparison of canagliflozin and teneligliptin on energy intake and body weight in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes: a subanalysis of the CANTABILE study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMC Endocrine Disorders Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1186/s12902-024-01690-6
Masahiro Isogawa, Hisashi Makino, Cheol Son, Kunihiro Nishimura, Takumi Hirata, Shu Kasama, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Michio Noguchi, Masato Kasahara, Kiminori Hosoda
{"title":"Comparison of canagliflozin and teneligliptin on energy intake and body weight in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes: a subanalysis of the CANTABILE study.","authors":"Masahiro Isogawa, Hisashi Makino, Cheol Son, Kunihiro Nishimura, Takumi Hirata, Shu Kasama, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Michio Noguchi, Masato Kasahara, Kiminori Hosoda","doi":"10.1186/s12902-024-01690-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) are widely used for the glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, the differences in the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors on energy intake and diabetes-related indicators are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a subanalysis of the CANTABILE study which compared the effects of canagliflozin and teneligliptin on metabolic factors in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes. The changes at 24 weeks from the baseline of the diabetes-related indicators including Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), energy intake and body weight were compared between the canagliflozin and teneligliptin groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients in the canagliflozin group and 70 patients in the teneligliptin group were analyzed. A significant decrease in HbA1c was observed in both groups. In the teneligliptin group, although energy intake was significantly reduced, there was no significant change in body weight. Conversely, in the canagliflozin group, although energy intake tended to increase, body weight significantly decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Canagliflozin and teneligliptin have different effects on the dietary status of patients with Type 2 diabetes. Our result suggests that canagliflozin can manage blood glucose without weight gain, even with increased energy intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01690-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) are widely used for the glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, the differences in the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors on energy intake and diabetes-related indicators are unclear.

Methods: This was a subanalysis of the CANTABILE study which compared the effects of canagliflozin and teneligliptin on metabolic factors in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes. The changes at 24 weeks from the baseline of the diabetes-related indicators including Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), energy intake and body weight were compared between the canagliflozin and teneligliptin groups.

Results: Seventy-five patients in the canagliflozin group and 70 patients in the teneligliptin group were analyzed. A significant decrease in HbA1c was observed in both groups. In the teneligliptin group, although energy intake was significantly reduced, there was no significant change in body weight. Conversely, in the canagliflozin group, although energy intake tended to increase, body weight significantly decreased.

Conclusion: Canagliflozin and teneligliptin have different effects on the dietary status of patients with Type 2 diabetes. Our result suggests that canagliflozin can manage blood glucose without weight gain, even with increased energy intake.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡格列净和替尼列汀对日本 2 型糖尿病患者能量摄入和体重的影响比较:CANTABILE 研究的子分析。
背景:虽然钠-葡萄糖协同转运体2(SGLT2)抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP4)被广泛用于2型糖尿病的血糖控制,但SGLT2抑制剂和DPP4抑制剂对能量摄入和糖尿病相关指标的影响差异尚不清楚:本研究是CANTABILE研究的一项子分析,该研究比较了卡格列净和替尼列汀对日本2型糖尿病患者代谢因素的影响。结果比较了卡格列净组和替尼列汀组在24周时糖尿病相关指标(包括血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)、能量摄入和体重)与基线相比的变化:对 75 名卡格列净组患者和 70 名替尼格列汀组患者进行了分析。两组患者的 HbA1c 均明显下降。在替格列汀组,虽然能量摄入明显减少,但体重却没有明显变化。相反,在卡格列净组,虽然能量摄入呈上升趋势,但体重却明显下降:结论:卡那格列净和替尼列汀对 2 型糖尿病患者的饮食状况有不同的影响。我们的研究结果表明,即使能量摄入增加,卡格列净也能控制血糖而不增加体重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes screening among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a descriptive study of commercial claims, 2011–2019 Unravelling a hidden pathology of a vertebral fracture in a teenage girl Exploring the unique association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency in adults aged 20–59: findings based on the NHANES database Relationship between four visceral obesity indices and prediabetes and diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Dalian, China Prevalence, patterns, and determinants of vascular complications of type 2 diabetes in a teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1