Ahmed Hamdy G Ali, Asmaa Elganady, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Ahella Ismail A Mousa, Hatem Abdelmoneim Eldeeb, Ahmed Ramadan Fatiem, Yulia Skopina
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ahmed Hamdy G Ali, Asmaa Elganady, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Ahella Ismail A Mousa, Hatem Abdelmoneim Eldeeb, Ahmed Ramadan Fatiem, Yulia Skopina","doi":"10.2174/0115733971296457240805064237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, has demonstrated promising results in the treatment of axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). AxSpA management remains challenging since there is a gap in knowledge regarding the potential effect of upadacitinib in axSpA patients. Exploring novel therapeutic options is crucial. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize and synthesize results collected from available randomized-- controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for patients with axSpA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, and Cochrane Central was conducted in October 2023. Relevant RCTs were selected, and their data were extracted and analyzed using the RevMan 5.4 software. The main outcomes were assessment in Spondylarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20, ASAS40, SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) 50.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs with a total of 920 participants were included in this study. Upadacitinib showed significant improvement in the ASAS40 response, ASAS20 response, BASDAI50 response, and SPARCC MRI Sacroiliac Joint change from baseline compared to placebo at 14-week duration (RR 2.19, 95% CI (1.79 to 2.68), P < 0.00001), (RR 1.62, 95% CI [1.42 to 1.84), P < 0.00001), (RR 2.16, 95% CI (1.75 to 2.67), P < 0.00001), and (MD -3.32 points, 95% CI (-3.96 to -2.68), P < 0.00001) respectively. However, this efficacy decreased after the 52-week duration in terms of ASAS40 RR 2.19 vs. 1.02, ASAS20 RR 1.62 vs. 0.98, BASDAI 50 RR 2.16 vs. 1.05, and ASAS Partial Remission RR 3.82 vs. 1.07.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upadacitinib 15 mg showed satisfactory and promising efficacy in the treatment of AxSpA, with no difference in safety profile compared to the placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":11188,"journal":{"name":"Current rheumatology reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current rheumatology reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733971296457240805064237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, has demonstrated promising results in the treatment of axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). AxSpA management remains challenging since there is a gap in knowledge regarding the potential effect of upadacitinib in axSpA patients. Exploring novel therapeutic options is crucial. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize and synthesize results collected from available randomized-- controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for patients with axSpA.
Methods: A systematic literature search of Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, and Cochrane Central was conducted in October 2023. Relevant RCTs were selected, and their data were extracted and analyzed using the RevMan 5.4 software. The main outcomes were assessment in Spondylarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20, ASAS40, SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) 50.
Results: Three RCTs with a total of 920 participants were included in this study. Upadacitinib showed significant improvement in the ASAS40 response, ASAS20 response, BASDAI50 response, and SPARCC MRI Sacroiliac Joint change from baseline compared to placebo at 14-week duration (RR 2.19, 95% CI (1.79 to 2.68), P < 0.00001), (RR 1.62, 95% CI [1.42 to 1.84), P < 0.00001), (RR 2.16, 95% CI (1.75 to 2.67), P < 0.00001), and (MD -3.32 points, 95% CI (-3.96 to -2.68), P < 0.00001) respectively. However, this efficacy decreased after the 52-week duration in terms of ASAS40 RR 2.19 vs. 1.02, ASAS20 RR 1.62 vs. 0.98, BASDAI 50 RR 2.16 vs. 1.05, and ASAS Partial Remission RR 3.82 vs. 1.07.
Conclusion: Upadacitinib 15 mg showed satisfactory and promising efficacy in the treatment of AxSpA, with no difference in safety profile compared to the placebo.
简介奥达帕替尼是一种选择性 JAK1 抑制剂,在治疗轴性脊柱关节炎(AxSpA)方面取得了令人鼓舞的成果。由于对高达替尼在轴性脊柱关节炎患者中的潜在作用缺乏了解,因此轴性脊柱关节炎的治疗仍具有挑战性。探索新的治疗方案至关重要。因此,我们进行了这一系统综述和荟萃分析,总结和归纳了现有随机对照试验(RCT)中收集的有关奥达替尼对 axSpA 患者疗效和安全性的结果:方法:2023 年 10 月,通过 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、EBSCO 和 Cochrane Central 对 Medline 进行了系统的文献检索。筛选出相关的 RCT,并使用 RevMan 5.4 软件对其数据进行提取和分析。主要结果为脊柱关节炎国际协会(ASAS)20、ASAS40、SPARCC MRI骶髂关节和巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)50的评估结果:本研究纳入了三项研究,共有 920 人参与。与安慰剂相比,乌达帕替尼在为期14周的研究中,ASAS40反应、ASAS20反应、BASDAI50反应和SPARCC MRI骶髂关节与基线相比的变化均有显著改善(RR 2.19,95% CI (1.79 to 2.68),P < 0.00001)、(RR 1.62,95% CI [1.42 to 1.84],P < 0.00001)、(RR 2.16,95% CI (1.75 to 2.67),P < 0.00001)和(MD -3.32点,95% CI (-3.96 to -2.68),P < 0.00001)。然而,疗效在52周后有所下降,ASAS40 RR为2.19 vs. 1.02,ASAS20 RR为1.62 vs. 0.98,BASDAI 50 RR为2.16 vs. 1.05,ASAS部分缓解RR为3.82 vs. 1.07:奥帕他替尼15毫克治疗AxSpA的疗效令人满意且前景广阔,与安慰剂相比安全性无差异。
期刊介绍:
Current Rheumatology Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on rheumatology and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in rheumatology.