Assessing IgG4-related ophthalmic disease and its mimics: a comparison of ACR/EULAR, organ-specific and revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY Journal of Clinical Pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1136/jcp-2024-209552
Neha Bakshi, Aditi Aggarwal, Shashi Dhawan, A K Grover, Lalit Duggal, Sonia Badwal, Seema Rao
{"title":"Assessing IgG4-related ophthalmic disease and its mimics: a comparison of ACR/EULAR, organ-specific and revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria.","authors":"Neha Bakshi, Aditi Aggarwal, Shashi Dhawan, A K Grover, Lalit Duggal, Sonia Badwal, Seema Rao","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-209552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Diagnosis of IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) rests on the correlation of clinical features, serological testing and histopathology, using internationally accepted diagnostic criteria for objective interpretation; however, several mimickers of IgG4-RD overlap in clinical presentation and histopathology. We assess histopathological features in a series of presumptive IgG4-ROD cases, with emphasis on histopathological mimics and comparison of three IgG4-ROD diagnostic/classification criteria (organ-specific (OS), revised comprehensive diagnostic (RCD) and American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The histopathology database was screened for cases with clinical/histopathological suspicion of IgG4-ROD. Slides were reviewed, OS, RCD and ACR/EULAR criteria were applied, and the final clinicopathological diagnosis was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 patients (24 females, 13 males; 19-73 years) were diagnosed as either IgG4-ROD (n=18) or non-IgG4-related disease (n=19). Non-IgG4-related disease group showed elevated serum IgG4 (55.5%), fibrosis (100%), dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammation (92.8%), with an increase in tissue IgG4+plasma cells (57.1%) and elevated IgG4:IgG+plasma cell ratio (14.3%). ACR/EULAR missed 50% (9/18, sensitivity-52.8%) of true IgG4-ROD cases, while OS and RCD criteria missed 11.1% (2/18, sensitivity-88.9%) of IgG-ROD cases. ACR/EULAR criteria mislabelled 7.14% (1/14, specificity-90.9%) while OS and RCD criteria wrongly categorised 71.4% (10/14, specificity-47.4%) and 50% (7/14, specificity-63.2%) specific non-IgG4-ROD cases as IgG4-ROD. Storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, increased IgG4:IgG+plasma cell ratio and elevated serum IgG were statistically significant in distinguishing IgG4-ROD from its mimics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACR/EULAR criteria showed high specificity but were cumbersome and sensitivity was low, while RCD and OS criteria showed low specificity. Stringent clinicopathological correlation to exclude mimics is critical in avoiding diagnostic errors in IgG4-ROD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Diagnosis of IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) rests on the correlation of clinical features, serological testing and histopathology, using internationally accepted diagnostic criteria for objective interpretation; however, several mimickers of IgG4-RD overlap in clinical presentation and histopathology. We assess histopathological features in a series of presumptive IgG4-ROD cases, with emphasis on histopathological mimics and comparison of three IgG4-ROD diagnostic/classification criteria (organ-specific (OS), revised comprehensive diagnostic (RCD) and American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria).

Methods: The histopathology database was screened for cases with clinical/histopathological suspicion of IgG4-ROD. Slides were reviewed, OS, RCD and ACR/EULAR criteria were applied, and the final clinicopathological diagnosis was recorded.

Results: 37 patients (24 females, 13 males; 19-73 years) were diagnosed as either IgG4-ROD (n=18) or non-IgG4-related disease (n=19). Non-IgG4-related disease group showed elevated serum IgG4 (55.5%), fibrosis (100%), dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammation (92.8%), with an increase in tissue IgG4+plasma cells (57.1%) and elevated IgG4:IgG+plasma cell ratio (14.3%). ACR/EULAR missed 50% (9/18, sensitivity-52.8%) of true IgG4-ROD cases, while OS and RCD criteria missed 11.1% (2/18, sensitivity-88.9%) of IgG-ROD cases. ACR/EULAR criteria mislabelled 7.14% (1/14, specificity-90.9%) while OS and RCD criteria wrongly categorised 71.4% (10/14, specificity-47.4%) and 50% (7/14, specificity-63.2%) specific non-IgG4-ROD cases as IgG4-ROD. Storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, increased IgG4:IgG+plasma cell ratio and elevated serum IgG were statistically significant in distinguishing IgG4-ROD from its mimics.

Conclusion: ACR/EULAR criteria showed high specificity but were cumbersome and sensitivity was low, while RCD and OS criteria showed low specificity. Stringent clinicopathological correlation to exclude mimics is critical in avoiding diagnostic errors in IgG4-ROD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 IgG4 相关眼科疾病及其模拟病:ACR/EULAR、器官特异性诊断标准和修订版综合诊断标准的比较。
目的:IgG4相关眼病(IgG4-ROD)的诊断依赖于临床特征、血清学检测和组织病理学的相关性,并使用国际公认的诊断标准进行客观解释;然而,IgG4-RD的几种模仿者在临床表现和组织病理学方面存在重叠。我们评估了一系列推定IgG4-RD病例的组织病理学特征,重点是组织病理学模拟物以及三种IgG4-RD诊断/分类标准(器官特异性标准(OS)、修订的综合诊断标准(RCD)和美国风湿病学会/欧洲风湿病学协会联盟标准(ACR/EULAR))的比较:筛选组织病理学数据库中临床/组织病理学怀疑 IgG4-ROD 的病例。方法:在组织病理学数据库中筛选出临床/组织病理学怀疑 IgG4-ROD 的病例,审查切片,应用 OS、RCD 和 ACR/EULAR 标准,并记录最终的临床病理学诊断:37名患者(24名女性,13名男性;19-73岁)被诊断为IgG4-ROD(18人)或非IgG4相关疾病(19人)。非 IgG4 相关疾病组显示血清 IgG4 升高(55.5%)、纤维化(100%)、致密淋巴浆细胞炎(92.8%),组织 IgG4+ 浆细胞增加(57.1%),IgG4:IgG+ 浆细胞比率升高(14.3%)。ACR/EULAR漏诊了50%(9/18,敏感性-52.8%)真正的IgG4-ROD病例,而OS和RCD标准漏诊了11.1%(2/18,敏感性-88.9%)的IgG-ROD病例。ACR/EULAR标准误判了7.14%(1/14,特异性-90.9%)的病例,而OS和RCD标准则将71.4%(10/14,特异性-47.4%)和50%(7/14,特异性-63.2%)的特异性非IgG4-ROD病例错误地归类为IgG4-ROD。柱状纤维化、闭塞性静脉炎、IgG4:IgG+浆细胞比值升高和血清IgG升高在区分IgG4-ROD和其模拟者方面具有统计学意义:结论:ACR/EULAR 标准显示出较高的特异性,但操作繁琐且敏感性较低,而 RCD 和 OS 标准显示出较低的特异性。严格的临床病理相关性以排除拟态是避免 IgG4-ROD 诊断错误的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
期刊最新文献
Emerging fusion-associated mesenchymal tumours: a tabular guide and appraisal of five 'novel' entities. Extraction and classification of structured data from unstructured hepatobiliary pathology reports using large language models: a feasibility study compared with rules-based natural language processing. Prognostic implications of the immunohistochemical expression of perilipin 1 and adipophilin in high-grade liposarcoma. Seasonal variation of serum potassium and related prescription pattern: an ecological time series. Calculated LDL-cholesterol: comparability of the extended Martin/Hopkins, Sampson/NIH, Friedewald and four other equations in South African patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1