Psychometrics of an Eight-Item Pulmonary Artery Catheter Safe-Care Assessment Tool for Critical Care Nurses.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2023-0123
Stacey M Lieux, Lauren E Crosby, Sandra L Siedlecki
{"title":"Psychometrics of an Eight-Item Pulmonary Artery Catheter Safe-Care Assessment Tool for Critical Care Nurses.","authors":"Stacey M Lieux, Lauren E Crosby, Sandra L Siedlecki","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2023-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> The ability to safely care for patients with pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) is an essential skill for critical care nurses, yet no valid and reliable test exists to assess this knowledge. The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometrics of a test created to assess nurses' knowledge of PAC safe-care. <b>Methods:</b> Reliability was assessed using Kuder-Richardson-20, and validity was assessed using item difficulty, discrimination, and known-groups comparison. <b>Results:</b> The sample (<i>N</i> = 95) consisted of new graduates and experienced nurses. Reliability was less than desired (.657) but expected due to the small number of test items. Validity was supported by item difficulty, discrimination indices, and known-groups comparison. <b>Conclusion:</b> Assessing the reliability and validity of test questions is a crucial step for creating accurate instruments to assess safe-care practices, which can be used to improve course content and evaluation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2023-0123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The ability to safely care for patients with pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) is an essential skill for critical care nurses, yet no valid and reliable test exists to assess this knowledge. The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometrics of a test created to assess nurses' knowledge of PAC safe-care. Methods: Reliability was assessed using Kuder-Richardson-20, and validity was assessed using item difficulty, discrimination, and known-groups comparison. Results: The sample (N = 95) consisted of new graduates and experienced nurses. Reliability was less than desired (.657) but expected due to the small number of test items. Validity was supported by item difficulty, discrimination indices, and known-groups comparison. Conclusion: Assessing the reliability and validity of test questions is a crucial step for creating accurate instruments to assess safe-care practices, which can be used to improve course content and evaluation methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护护士用八项肺动脉导管安全护理评估工具的心理计量学研究。
背景和目的:安全护理肺动脉导管(PAC)患者的能力是重症监护护士的一项基本技能,但目前还没有有效可靠的测试来评估这方面的知识。本研究旨在评估一项测试的心理测量学,该测试旨在评估护士的肺动脉导管安全护理知识。方法:使用 Kuder-Richardson-20 评估信度,使用项目难度、区分度和已知组比较评估效度。结果样本(N = 95)由新毕业生和有经验的护士组成。信度低于预期(0.657),但由于测试项目较少,这在意料之中。项目难度、区分度指数和已知组比较均支持测验的有效性。结论评估测试题的信度和效度是创建准确的安全护理实践评估工具的关键步骤,可用于改进课程内容和评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Foot Health Assessment Instrument in Pregnant Women. Instruments Important to Help Increase Diversity Equity and Inclusion. The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study. Development of the Followership Evaluation Instrument for Nurses: A Prospective Longitudinal Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1